Jeremy Jahn vs Botic Van De Zandschulp Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Jahn vs Zandschulp analysis and find out who is favored!
Jeremy Jahn vs Botic Van De Zandschulp Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Jahn has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Zandschulp has won 49.66%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Jahn, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Zandschulp has won 50.19%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 28.92% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Jahn has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Zandschulp has saved 61.29% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Jahn has won 57.58% of matches played (W/L 19/ 14), with Zandschulp winning 44% (W/L 22/ 28) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Jahn has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 57% (W/L 229/ 170), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Zandschulp has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 66% (W/L 87/ 45), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 48% (W/L 10/ 11).
- Player level: In the last year, Jahn has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 60.71% of matches (W/L 17/ 11), where as Zandschulp has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 40% of matches (W/L 10/ 15). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Jahn winning 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Jahn winning 1 and Zandschulp winning 2. The last match between Jahn and Zandschulp was at the Mallorca Challenger, 26-08-2019, First, Hard with Botic Van De Zandschulp getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:40:4.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Jahn and Zandschulp have played a deciding set 1 times, with Jahn winning 0 times and Zandschulp 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Jahn winning 0, and Zandschulp 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Jahn has played against opponents with an average rank of 188.64 while Zandschulp has played against players with an average rank of 155.02.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Jahn has won 29% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Zandschulp has won 64% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Jahn has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Zandschulp has converted 36.69% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Jahn 0 - 1 Zandschulp
12
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
11
Minor
691
Rank
197
High
34
Age
R
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard1
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
89
Rank
22
High
28
Age
R
Plays
7
Total
0
Mast
1
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
5
Minor
Form
56% (305-243)
Career Total W/L
63% (326-193)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
33% (6-12)
$2,285
Career Prize Money
$2,830,210
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Jahn VS Zandschulp H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
stats | Jeremy Jahn | Botic Van De Zandschulp |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
Sets Won | 1 | 2 |
Games Won | 9 | 17 |
Aces (Total) | 3 | 3 |
DFs (Total) | 9 | 2 |
Avg Match Time | 1:40:4 | 1:40:4 |
1st Serve % | 62% (52/84) | 51% (40/78) |
1st Serve Win% | 63% (33/52) | 73% (29/40) |
2nd Serve Win% | 34% (11/32) | 66% (25/38) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 40% (2/5) | 43% (6/14) |
Return Points W% | 31% (24/78) | 48% (40/84) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Jahn VS Zandschulp H2h Matches played
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-2 5-7 6-0 |
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Jeremy Jahn
51%
(
40 of
78)
1st Serve %
62%
(
52 of
84)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
9
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
33 of
52)
66%
(
25 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
31%
(
24 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
40 of
84)
94
Total Points Won
68
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Jeremy Jahn | Botic Van De Zandschulp |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (6/12) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 33% (13/26) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 45% (177/218) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 36% (4/7) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 25% (1/3) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/2) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0.46 |
Aces Total | 0 | 87 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0.27 |
DFs Total | 0 | 52 |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:43:24 |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 166.83 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 64% (800/1251) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 68% (544/800) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 47% (213/451) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 35% (33/93) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 36% (431/1211) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 25% (1/3) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 36% (4/7) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 38% (6/16) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 50% (5/10) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 67% (2/3) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 83% (6/5) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 17% (6/1) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 8% (12/1) |
Jeremy Jahn Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 |
Timo Stodder
Player
Jeremy Jahn
67%
(
50 of
75)
1st Serve %
49%
(
43 of
87)
3
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
2
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
18 of
44)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
40%
(
30 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
42 of
87)
87
Total Points Won
75
|
7-6(2) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Henri Laaksonen
Player
Jeremy Jahn
49%
(
61 of
125)
1st Serve %
63%
(
82 of
130)
1
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
6
75%
(
46 of
61)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
49 of
82)
42%
(
27 of
64)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
20%
(
4 of
20)
42%
(
52 of
125)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
55 of
130)
128
Total Points Won
127
|
6-7(5) 6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
QF |
Jeremy Jahn
Player
Maks Kasnikowski
60%
(
40 of
67)
1st Serve %
58%
(
26 of
45)
1
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
17 of
26)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
34%
(
23 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
21 of
45)
65
Total Points Won
47
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Jeremy Jahn
Player
Kai Wehnelt
59%
(
39 of
66)
1st Serve %
57%
(
43 of
76)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
7
62%
(
24 of
39)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
30 of
43)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
9 of
33)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
45%
(
30 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
37 of
76)
73
Total Points Won
69
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Max Houkes
Player
Jeremy Jahn
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve %
47%
(
34 of
72)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
86%
(
32 of
37)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
20%
(
10 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
30 of
72)
71
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
R2 |
Jeremy Jahn
Player
Marlon Vankan
62%
(
39 of
63)
1st Serve %
68%
(
59 of
87)
2
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
3
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
32 of
59)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
22 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
42 of
87)
83
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Jeremy Jahn
Player
Alec Deckers
52%
(
58 of
111)
1st Serve %
59%
(
59 of
100)
5
Aces
11
5
Double Faults
6
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
43 of
59)
57%
(
30 of
53)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
37%
(
41 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
37 of
100)
107
Total Points Won
104
|
3-6 6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
QF |
Viacheslav Bielinskyi
Player
Jeremy Jahn
89%
(
57 of
64)
1st Serve %
52%
(
40 of
77)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
58%
(
33 of
57)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
86%
(
6 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
39%
(
25 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
34 of
77)
73
Total Points Won
68
|
0-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Jeremy Jahn
Player
Jasza Szajrych
65%
(
42 of
65)
1st Serve %
63%
(
54 of
86)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
36 of
54)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
31%
(
20 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
39 of
86)
84
Total Points Won
67
|
6-2 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Jeremy Jahn
Player
Dominik Kellovsky
60%
(
41 of
68)
1st Serve %
70%
(
53 of
76)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
5
63%
(
26 of
41)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
28 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
35 of
76)
75
Total Points Won
69
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H |
view more
Botic Van De Zandschulp Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
Jan-Lennard Struff
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
56%
(
42 of
75)
1st Serve %
70%
(
74 of
105)
7
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
46 of
74)
61%
(
20 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
15%
(
2 of
13)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
25 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
46 of
105)
96
Total Points Won
84
|
7-6(0) 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 4-1 ret. | H2H | |||
R2 |
Casper Ruud
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
75%
(
41 of
55)
1st Serve %
57%
(
31 of
54)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
28 of
54)
65
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Federico Coria
64%
(
65 of
102)
1st Serve %
64%
(
52 of
81)
1
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
0
65%
(
42 of
65)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
25 of
52)
46%
(
17 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
42%
(
43 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
40 of
81)
99
Total Points Won
84
|
6-4 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Ugo Humbert
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
70%
(
44 of
63)
1st Serve %
65%
(
35 of
54)
3
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
2
84%
(
37 of
44)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
32%
(
6 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
20 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
54)
66
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Rinky Hijikata
73%
(
61 of
84)
1st Serve %
54%
(
36 of
67)
8
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
69%
(
42 of
61)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
33%
(
28 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
21 of
67)
77
Total Points Won
74
|
7-5 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Denis Shapovalov
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
57%
(
29 of
51)
1st Serve %
56%
(
32 of
57)
8
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
6
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
15 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
29 of
57)
65
Total Points Won
43
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Sebastian Korda
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve %
58%
(
18 of
31)
10
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
88%
(
22 of
25)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
8%
(
1 of
13)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
10 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
21 of
31)
49
Total Points Won
20
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Adrian Mannarino
63%
(
42 of
67)
1st Serve %
59%
(
41 of
69)
5
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
1
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
30 of
41)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
30%
(
20 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
27 of
69)
74
Total Points Won
62
|
7-6(3) 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Gael Monfils
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
67%
(
54 of
81)
1st Serve %
68%
(
45 of
66)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
37%
(
30 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
27 of
66)
78
Total Points Won
69
|
6-1 7-6(9) | H2H |
view more