Jeremy Jahn vs Julian Onken Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Jahn vs Onken analysis and find out who is favored!
Jeremy Jahn vs Julian Onken Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Jahn has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Onken has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Jahn, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Onken has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Jahn has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Onken has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Jahn has won 57.58% of matches played (W/L 19/ 14), with Onken winning 25% (W/L 1/ 3) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Jahn has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 57% (W/L 229/ 170), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Onken has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 58% (W/L 110/ 79), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2).
- Player level: In the last year, Jahn has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 60.71% of matches (W/L 17/ 11), where as Onken has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 25% of matches (W/L 1/ 3). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Jahn winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Jahn winning 2 and Onken winning 0. The last match between Jahn and Onken was at the Morocco F1, 09-03-2016, Second, Clay with Jeremy Jahn getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:53:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Jahn and Onken have played a deciding set 0 times, with Jahn winning 0 times and Onken 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Jahn winning 0, and Onken 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Jahn has played against opponents with an average rank of 188.64 while Onken has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Jahn has won 29% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Onken has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Jahn has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Onken has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Jahn 1 - 0 Onken
12
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
11
Minor
691
Rank
197
High
34
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
892
Rank
693
High
35
Age
R
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
56% (305-243)
Career Total W/L
58% (122-90)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$2,285
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Jeremy Jahn | Julian Onken |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 12 | 3 |
Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 2 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 0:53:0 | 0:53:0 |
1st Serve % | 71% (30/42) | 67% (32/48) |
1st Serve Win% | 77% (23/30) | 41% (13/32) |
2nd Serve Win% | 50% (6/12) | 31% (5/16) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 55% (6/11) | 25% (1/4) |
Return Points W% | 63% (30/48) | 31% (13/42) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-1 6-2 |
Jeremy Jahn
Player
Julian Onken
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve %
67%
(
32 of
48)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
0
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
13 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
30 of
48)
59
Total Points Won
31
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Jeremy Jahn | Julian Onken |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Jeremy Jahn Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 |
Timo Stodder
Player
Jeremy Jahn
67%
(
50 of
75)
1st Serve %
49%
(
43 of
87)
3
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
2
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
18 of
44)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
40%
(
30 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
42 of
87)
87
Total Points Won
75
|
7-6(2) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Henri Laaksonen
Player
Jeremy Jahn
49%
(
61 of
125)
1st Serve %
63%
(
82 of
130)
1
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
6
75%
(
46 of
61)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
49 of
82)
42%
(
27 of
64)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
20%
(
4 of
20)
42%
(
52 of
125)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
55 of
130)
128
Total Points Won
127
|
6-7(5) 6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
QF |
Jeremy Jahn
Player
Maks Kasnikowski
60%
(
40 of
67)
1st Serve %
58%
(
26 of
45)
1
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
17 of
26)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
34%
(
23 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
21 of
45)
65
Total Points Won
47
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Jeremy Jahn
Player
Kai Wehnelt
59%
(
39 of
66)
1st Serve %
57%
(
43 of
76)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
7
62%
(
24 of
39)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
30 of
43)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
9 of
33)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
45%
(
30 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
37 of
76)
73
Total Points Won
69
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Max Houkes
Player
Jeremy Jahn
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve %
47%
(
34 of
72)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
86%
(
32 of
37)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
20%
(
10 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
30 of
72)
71
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
R2 |
Jeremy Jahn
Player
Marlon Vankan
62%
(
39 of
63)
1st Serve %
68%
(
59 of
87)
2
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
3
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
32 of
59)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
22 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
42 of
87)
83
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Jeremy Jahn
Player
Alec Deckers
52%
(
58 of
111)
1st Serve %
59%
(
59 of
100)
5
Aces
11
5
Double Faults
6
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
43 of
59)
57%
(
30 of
53)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
37%
(
41 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
37 of
100)
107
Total Points Won
104
|
3-6 6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
QF |
Viacheslav Bielinskyi
Player
Jeremy Jahn
89%
(
57 of
64)
1st Serve %
52%
(
40 of
77)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
58%
(
33 of
57)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
86%
(
6 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
39%
(
25 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
34 of
77)
73
Total Points Won
68
|
0-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Jeremy Jahn
Player
Jasza Szajrych
65%
(
42 of
65)
1st Serve %
63%
(
54 of
86)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
36 of
54)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
31%
(
20 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
39 of
86)
84
Total Points Won
67
|
6-2 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Jeremy Jahn
Player
Dominik Kellovsky
60%
(
41 of
68)
1st Serve %
70%
(
53 of
76)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
5
63%
(
26 of
41)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
28 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
35 of
76)
75
Total Points Won
69
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H |
view more
Julian Onken Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q2 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 7-5 4-6 10-4 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 5-2 ret. | H2H | |||
Q1 | 7-5 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 3-6 6-4 10-5 | H2H | |||
QF |
Daniel De Jonge
Player
Julian Onken
56%
(
48 of
86)
1st Serve %
71%
(
55 of
77)
5
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
0
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
30 of
55)
45%
(
17 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
40%
(
34 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
36 of
77)
88
Total Points Won
75
|
6-2 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-0 6-2 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Leopold Zima
Player
Julian Onken
57%
(
60 of
106)
1st Serve %
67%
(
67 of
100)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
0
70%
(
42 of
60)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
39 of
67)
48%
(
22 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
40%
(
42 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
44 of
100)
108
Total Points Won
98
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Louis Herman
Player
Julian Onken
42%
(
32 of
77)
1st Serve %
63%
(
46 of
73)
2
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
2
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
42%
(
19 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
100%
(
7 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
47%
(
36 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
40 of
73)
81
Total Points Won
69
|
6-4 3-6 6-2 | H2H |
view more