Ji Sung Nam vs Amaury Raynel Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Nam vs Raynel analysis and find out who is favored!
Ji Sung Nam vs Amaury Raynel Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Nam has won 48.3% of points on his second serve, while Raynel has won 50.98%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Nam, in recent form, has won 53.57% of his opponent's second serve points, while Raynel has won 55.22%. The same stats for first serve returns are 37.01% and 33.7% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Nam has saved 64.29% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Raynel has saved 61.92% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Nam has won 44.83% of matches played (W/L 13/ 16), with Raynel winning 58.57% (W/L 41/ 29) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Nam has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 58% (W/L 227/ 165), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 33% (W/L 1/ 2). Raynel has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 64% (W/L 58/ 33), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 55% (W/L 23/ 19).
- Player level: In the last year, Nam has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 46.43% of matches (W/L 13/ 15), where as Raynel has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 58.57% of matches (W/L 41/ 29). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Nam winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Nam winning 2 and Raynel winning 1. The last match between Nam and Raynel was at the M15 Chiang Rai, 07-04-2022, Second, Hard with Ji Sung Nam getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:20:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Nam and Raynel have played a deciding set 1 times, with Nam winning 1 times and Raynel 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Nam winning 0, and Raynel 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Nam has played against opponents with an average rank of 317.52 while Raynel has played against players with an average rank of 101.57.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Nam has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Raynel has won 60% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Nam has converted 39.02% of breakpoint opportunities, and Raynel has converted 46.03% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Nam 1 - 0 Raynel
5
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
5
Minor
701
Rank
236
High
30
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
622
Rank
622
High
21
Age
Plays
1
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
1
Minor
Form
57% (274-210)
Career Total W/L
59% (133-94)
0% (0-1)
YTD W/L
50% (8-8)
$1,445
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Ji Sung Nam | Amaury Raynel |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
Games Won | 18 | 8 |
Aces (Total) | 9 | 1 |
DFs (Total) | 0 | 4 |
Avg Match Time | 2:20:0 | 2:20:0 |
1st Serve % | 70% (63/90) | 60% (58/96) |
1st Serve Win% | 63% (40/63) | 55% (32/58) |
2nd Serve Win% | 56% (15/27) | 32% (12/38) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 44% (8/18) | 43% (3/7) |
Return Points W% | 54% (52/96) | 39% (35/90) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-7(7) 6-0 6-1 |
Ji Sung Nam
Player
Amaury Raynel
70%
(
63 of
90)
1st Serve %
60%
(
58 of
96)
9
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
63%
(
40 of
63)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
32 of
58)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
12 of
38)
44%
(
8 of
18)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
39%
(
35 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
52 of
96)
107
Total Points Won
79
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Ji Sung Nam | Amaury Raynel |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/1) | 50% (8/8) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/2) | 49% (20/21) |
Games Win/Loss | 38% (8/13) | 51% (195/189) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 60% (3/2) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 45% (5/6) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.2 | 0.27 |
Aces Total | 2 | 51 |
DFs per game | 0.3 | 0.16 |
DFs Total | 3 | 30 |
Avg Match Time | N/A | 1:55:15 |
Avg Opp Rank | 137 | 108.81 |
1st Serve % | 54% (43/80) | 68% (824/1204) |
1st Serve W% | 65% (28/43) | 64% (527/824) |
2nd Serve W% | 57% (21/37) | 51% (192/380) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/2) | 52% (53/102) |
Return Pts W% | 24% (14/58) | 41% (483/1175) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/1) | 50% (8/8) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 50% (8/16) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 50% (1/2) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 56% (5/9) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 50% (6/3) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (6/3) |
1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 50% (10/5) |
Ji Sung Nam Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Alex Bolt
Player
Ji Sung Nam
64%
(
37 of
58)
1st Serve %
54%
(
43 of
80)
6
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
84%
(
31 of
37)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
28 of
43)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
14 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
31 of
80)
75
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Kaichi Uchida
Player
Ji Sung Nam
57%
(
76 of
134)
1st Serve %
57%
(
59 of
104)
1
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
4
63%
(
48 of
76)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
38 of
59)
50%
(
29 of
58)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
43%
(
57 of
134)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
44 of
104)
121
Total Points Won
117
|
7-6(6) 2-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Ji Sung Nam
Player
Calum Puttergill
59%
(
41 of
70)
1st Serve %
63%
(
54 of
86)
8
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
30%
(
21 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
44 of
86)
93
Total Points Won
63
|
4-6 6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Ji Sung Nam
Player
Fajing Sun
57%
(
44 of
77)
1st Serve %
63%
(
31 of
49)
4
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
1
77%
(
34 of
44)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
36%
(
12 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
40%
(
31 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
24 of
49)
70
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Rinky Hijikata
Player
Ji Sung Nam
65%
(
87 of
134)
1st Serve %
66%
(
92 of
139)
5
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
2
67%
(
58 of
87)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
62 of
92)
45%
(
21 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
16 of
47)
26%
(
5 of
19)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
41%
(
55 of
134)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
61 of
139)
140
Total Points Won
133
|
6-7(5) 7-5 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
R2 |
Ji Sung Nam
Player
Dane Sweeny
58%
(
25 of
43)
1st Serve %
55%
(
29 of
53)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
88%
(
22 of
25)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
78%
(
14 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
7 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
22 of
53)
58
Total Points Won
38
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Ji Sung Nam
Player
Tristan Schoolkate
66%
(
49 of
74)
1st Serve %
52%
(
37 of
71)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
5
61%
(
30 of
49)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
28 of
37)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
13 of
34)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
41%
(
30 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
30 of
71)
74
Total Points Won
71
|
7-6(9) 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Ji Sung Nam
Player
Yusuke Takahashi
59%
(
26 of
44)
1st Serve %
61%
(
28 of
46)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
85%
(
22 of
26)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
10 of
18)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
11 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
56
Total Points Won
34
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Ji Sung Nam
Player
Alexander Klintcharov
74%
(
42 of
57)
1st Serve %
71%
(
52 of
73)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
24 of
52)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
13 of
21)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
30%
(
17 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
36 of
73)
76
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Rinky Hijikata
Player
Ji Sung Nam
67%
(
59 of
88)
1st Serve %
76%
(
51 of
67)
1
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
33 of
51)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
41%
(
36 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
27 of
67)
79
Total Points Won
76
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H |
view more
Amaury Raynel Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Alexandre Aubriot
Player
Amaury Raynel
66%
(
57 of
87)
1st Serve %
71%
(
59 of
83)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
68%
(
39 of
57)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
39 of
59)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
37%
(
32 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
34 of
83)
89
Total Points Won
81
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Axel Garcian
Player
Amaury Raynel
67%
(
41 of
61)
1st Serve %
61%
(
45 of
74)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
29 of
45)
35%
(
7 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
25%
(
4 of
16)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
36%
(
22 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
32 of
74)
71
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Patrick Zahraj
Player
Amaury Raynel
54%
(
38 of
70)
1st Serve %
71%
(
50 of
70)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
66%
(
21 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
23 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
30 of
70)
77
Total Points Won
63
|
3-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Amaury Raynel
Player
Emile Hudd
64%
(
63 of
99)
1st Serve %
61%
(
78 of
128)
1
Aces
13
4
Double Faults
6
73%
(
46 of
63)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
57 of
78)
58%
(
21 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
18%
(
2 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
32%
(
32 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
46 of
128)
113
Total Points Won
114
|
2-6 7-6(5) 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Amaury Raynel
Player
Elvin Hashimov
63%
(
27 of
43)
1st Serve %
45%
(
17 of
38)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
6
63%
(
17 of
27)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
10%
(
2 of
21)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
40%
(
17 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
76%
(
29 of
38)
55
Total Points Won
26
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Marek Gengel
Player
Amaury Raynel
58%
(
49 of
84)
1st Serve %
70%
(
62 of
88)
3
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
1
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
36 of
62)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
38%
(
32 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
44 of
88)
96
Total Points Won
76
|
5-7 6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Amaury Raynel
Player
Henri Haupt
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve %
64%
(
23 of
36)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
39%
(
20 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
57
Total Points Won
30
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Evan Furness
Player
Amaury Raynel
72%
(
41 of
57)
1st Serve %
74%
(
52 of
70)
1
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
22 of
52)
25%
(
4 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
44%
(
25 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
40 of
70)
72
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Amaury Raynel
Player
Mae Malige
71%
(
72 of
102)
1st Serve %
52%
(
50 of
97)
1
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
5
64%
(
46 of
72)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
37%
(
38 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
43 of
97)
107
Total Points Won
92
|
5-7 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Alessandro Pecci
Player
Amaury Raynel
63%
(
49 of
78)
1st Serve %
57%
(
43 of
75)
13
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
80%
(
39 of
49)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
31 of
43)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
26 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
31 of
75)
83
Total Points Won
70
|
3-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H |
view more