Jim Walder vs Jimmy Yang Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Walder vs Yang analysis and find out who is favored!
Jim Walder vs Jimmy Yang Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Walder has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Yang has won 45.68%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Walder, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Yang has won 43.24%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 29.79% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Walder has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Yang has saved 51.39% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Walder has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Yang winning 45.1% (W/L 23/ 28) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Walder has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 40% (W/L 18/ 27), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2). Yang has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 50% (W/L 10/ 10), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 42% (W/L 10/ 14).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Walder winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Walder winning 2 and Yang winning 0. The last match between Walder and Yang was at the M25 Meerbusch, 12-04-2021, Q1 round, Clay with Jim Walder getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Walder and Yang have played a deciding set 0 times, with Walder winning 0 times and Yang 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Walder winning 0, and Yang 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Walder has played against opponents with an average rank of while Yang has played against players with an average rank of 115.04.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Walder has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Yang has won 36% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Walder has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Yang has converted 42% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Walder 1 - 0 Yang
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Ret.
Rank
High
23
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
726
Rank
709
High
26
Age
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
38% (24-40)
Career Total W/L
48% (73-80)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
33% (4-8)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Jim Walder | Jimmy Yang |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 12 | 5 |
Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-2 6-3 |
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Jim Walder | Jimmy Yang |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (4/8) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 35% (9/17) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 46% (119/138) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 29% (2/5) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 40% (2/3) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0.38 |
Aces Total | 0 | 48 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0.3 |
DFs Total | 0 | 38 |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:18:55 |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 51.08 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 56% (311/558) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 70% (219/311) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 45% (112/247) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 46% (18/39) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 35% (201/572) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (4/8) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 33% (4/12) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 25% (1/4) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/2) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 80% (5/4) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 20% (5/1) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (7/0) |
Jim Walder Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q2 | 6-4 7-5 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-3 7-5 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 7-5 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-3 7-5 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 1-6 6-2 15-13 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 4-6 6-3 10-5 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H |
view more
Jimmy Yang Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF |
Keisuke Saitoh
Player
Jimmy Yang
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve %
56%
(
24 of
43)
4
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
3
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
15 of
24)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
24%
(
9 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
51
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Takuya Kumasaka
Player
Jimmy Yang
67%
(
36 of
54)
1st Serve %
52%
(
26 of
50)
2
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
3
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
20 of
26)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
28%
(
15 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
22 of
50)
61
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-4 7-5 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Yan Bai
Player
Jimmy Yang
70%
(
47 of
67)
1st Serve %
63%
(
46 of
73)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
60%
(
28 of
47)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
39%
(
26 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
73)
75
Total Points Won
65
|
6-4 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Stefanos Sakellaridis
Player
Jimmy Yang
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve %
55%
(
33 of
60)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
5
67%
(
22 of
33)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
17 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
60)
65
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Alexandre Aubriot
Player
Jimmy Yang
54%
(
37 of
68)
1st Serve %
64%
(
45 of
70)
6
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
4
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
33 of
45)
68%
(
21 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
17 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
23 of
70)
74
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
R2 |
Jimmy Yang
Player
Charlie Camus
54%
(
55 of
102)
1st Serve %
61%
(
67 of
109)
17
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
6
82%
(
45 of
55)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
46 of
67)
55%
(
26 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
31 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
42 of
109)
113
Total Points Won
98
|
6-2 6-7(5) 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Jimmy Yang
Player
Leo Raquillet
50%
(
27 of
54)
1st Serve %
70%
(
52 of
74)
1
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
3
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
39%
(
21 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
39 of
74)
72
Total Points Won
56
|
6-1 7-6(4) | H2H |
view more