Jiri Lehecka vs Borna Coric Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• How do second serve performances compare? In the past six months, Lehecka's second serve success rate is higher at 49.45% compared to Coric's 46.08%, indicating a stronger second serve performance.
• Examining return game stats, Coric holds a slight edge over Lehecka in recent form, winning 42.51% of second serve returns versus Lehecka's 41.6%. For first serve returns, Coric is also ahead, winning 23.5% compared to Lehecka's 21.44%.
• Under pressure, both players save breakpoints at nearly identical rates, with Lehecka saving 55.79% and Coric 55.81% of breakpoints, making this aspect quite balanced.
• Overall performance in the past year shows Coric winning slightly more of his matches at 62% as opposed to Lehecka's 61.19%, suggesting a slight overall edge for Coric in win/loss ratios.
• Surface performance reveals Lehecka's strongest surface is Clay with a 63% win rate, while Coric excels on Indoor Hard courts with a 61% win rate.
• Regarding the level of tournaments, Lehecka has faced tougher competition on the Main Tour, winning 70.27% of matches, whereas Coric has dominated at the Challenger/ITF tournaments, winning 83.33% of matches.
• In their direct head-to-head matchup, Lehecka leads with a perfect record, having beaten Coric once with a three-set victory, all sets won by Lehecka.
• On opponent quality, Lehecka's opponents have an average rank of 60.03 in the past year, significantly tougher than Coric's opponents, who average a rank of 188.9, potentially contributing to Lehecka's competitive edge.
• If the match reaches a deciding set, Lehecka has a slight edge with a 52% win rate in deciding sets over the last 12 months compared to Coric's 50% rate.
• Lehecka is more effective in breaking opponents, converting 32.48% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Coric converts 29.77%, giving Lehecka an advantage in capitalizing on break opportunities.

Editorial Prediction (August 23, 2025, UTC):

Analyzing the recent performance trends, Lehecka appears to have an edge in key areas such as second serve efficacy and breakpoint conversion rates. These factors are crucial in determining match outcomes.

While Coric shows strength in returning serves, his opponents generally have lower ranks, which might skew the perception of his performance. Lehecka's exposure to higher-ranked opponents on the Main Tour further bolsters his standing.

Considering their direct encounter and Lehecka's dominant win, along with his slight historical lead in deciding sets, Lehecka seems more adept to sustain pressure in head-to-head situations.

Based on these comparative statistics and analysis, Lehecka is predicted to be the more likely winner in the upcoming tennis match against Coric.