Joanna Garland vs Arianne Hartono Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 28 Oct at 03:29 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
J. Garland vs A. Hartono

TPE
1
Win
Played
0
Win

NED
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Garland 1 - 0 Hartono
They have played 2 sets in total, with Joanna Garland winning 2 and Arianne Hartono winning 0. The last match between Joanna Garland and Arianne Hartono was at the Chennai Open - Chennai, 29-10-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Joanna Garland getting the victory 6-4 6-3.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Garland | 1 |
| Hartono | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) Chennai Open - Chennai(10-29-25)
J. Garland vs A. Hartono H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $150,725 | Career Prize Money | $426,749 |
| 68.07% (275-129) | Career Total W/L | 56.84% (266-202) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 16 | Titles | 3 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 46.15% (6-7) | YTD Win/Loss | 0.00% (0-3) |
J. Garland vs A. Hartono Match Preview:
- Arianne Hartono has slightly outperformed Joanna Garland in recent second serve points, winning 40.97% compared to Garland's 39.83%. Could this give Hartono a slight edge?
- In return game stats, Hartono leads with 50.63% won on opponents' second serve points, while Garland has 47.83%. This could be crucial in predicting match outcomes.
- First serve return stats are very close, with Garland slightly leading at 29.73%, just ahead of Hartono's 29.46%.
- Under pressure, Hartono has saved 49.10% of breakpoints, marginally better than Garland's 48.72%. Will this resilience under pressure prove decisive?
- Over the past year, Garland has a significantly higher match win percentage at 77.42%, compared to Hartono's 43.40%, indicating stronger overall performance.
- Surface preference shows both have their best win percentage on hard courts (Hartono on I.hard and Garland on Hard), yet Hartono is less successful on Grass with only 35% wins.
- At the $10K Challengers/ITF level, Garland has an impressive win rate of 83.08%, much higher than Hartono's 45.00%, suggesting Garland thrives better at this level.
- Hartono has faced tougher opponents on average, with opponents ranked at 226.51, compared to Garland's at 342.29. How might this difference in competition experience play out in their head-to-head?
- If the match goes to a deciding set, Garland seems stronger, winning 78% of such sets compared to Hartono's 42% over the last year.
Editorial Prediction (October 28, 2025, UTC):
Based on recent performance patterns, Arianne Hartono has shown marginally better second serve and return game stats, suggesting a slight competitive edge in those areas.
However, Joanna Garland’s overall match-winning percentage, coupled with her higher success rate at the $10K tournament level, positions her as the more consistent performer in head-to-head comparisons.
Despite Hartono facing more challenging opponents on average, Garland’s dominant deciding set victories indicate a mental fortitude that may prove decisive under pressure.
In summary, Garland's consistent form and higher level of play in critical match scenarios make her the likely favorite for this upcoming tennis match.
Joanna Garland vs Arianne Hartono Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
J. Garland vs A. Hartono H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 7 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 6 |
| 1:27:15 | Average Match Time | 1:27:15 |
| 68% (40/59) | 1st Serve % | 69% (45/65) |
| 60% (24/40) | 1st Serve Win % | 53% (24/45) |
| 42% (8/19) | 2nd Serve Win % | 30% (6/20) |
| 58% (7/12) | Break Pts Won % | 67% (4/6) |
| 54% (35/65) | Return Points Win % | 46% (27/59) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
J. Garland Recent Matches Played
A. Hartono Recent Matches Played

J. Garland vs A. Hartono Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 68.07% (275/129) | YTD Win/Loss | 56.84% (266/202) |
| 65.59% (587/308) | Sets Win/Loss | 55.26% (604/489) |
| 57.60% (4629/3407) | Games Win/Loss | 52.67% (5284/4749) |
| 70.00% (168/72) | Hard Win/Loss | 58.70% (162/114) |
| 65.57% (40/21) | Clay Win/Loss | 54.74% (52/43) |
| 64.63% (53/29) | Indoor Hard W/L | 58.44% (45/32) |
| 66.67% (14/7) | Grass Win/Loss | 35.00% (7/13) |
| 0.22 | Aces Per Game | 0.18 |
| 870 | Aces Total | 871 |
| 0.29 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.48 |
| 1144 | Total Double Faults | 2331 |
| 1:37:3 | Average Match Time | 1:30:38 |
| 449.32 | Average Opponent Rank | 441.78 |
| 62% (14747/23866) | 1st Serve % | 58% (17446/30288) |
| 65% (9656/14747) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (10957/17446) |
| 49% (4451/9119) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (5670/12842) |
| 48% (1603/3332) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 49% (1951/3980) |
| 48% (11612/24375) | Return Points Win % | 47% (14320/30669) |
| 60.00% (6/4) | Slam W/L | 50.00% (16/16) |
| 50.00% (1/1) | Masters W/L | 0.00% (0/2) |
| 50.00% (4/4) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 53.33% (8/7) | Main Tour W/L | 53.19% (25/22) |
| 68.20% (178/83) | Challenger W/L | 55.63% (168/134) |
| 72.22% (78/30) | Futures W/L | 67.06% (57/28) |
| 68% (271/399) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 56% (261/463) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (4/4) |
| 52% (35/67) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 48% (47/97) |
| 54% (49/90) | Deciding Set Win % | 53% (81/154) |
| 93% (260/243) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (264/226) |
| 7% (260/17) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (264/38) |
| 22% (144/31) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (204/40) |