Joao Fonseca vs Botic Van De Zandschulp Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan
Published on 14 Oct at 08:13 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
J. Fonseca vs B. Van De Zandschulp

BRA
1
Win
Played
1
Win

NED
1
Win
Played
1
Win
Head-to-head: Fonseca 1 - 1 Zandschulp
They have played 4 sets in total, with Joao Fonseca winning 2 and Botic Van De Zandschulp winning 2. The last match between Botic Van De Zandschulp and Joao Fonseca was at the European Open - Brussels, 14-10-2025, Round: R1, Surface: I.hard, with Botic Van De Zandschulp getting the victory 7-5 7-6(2).
Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Fonseca | 1 |
Zandschulp | 1 |
Last 2 H2H Matches:
(R1) European Open - Brussels(10-14-25)
(Rubber 1) Davis Cup, Group A, Bologna(09-12-24)
J. Fonseca vs B. V. D. Zandschulp H2H Profile
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
$976,115 | Career Prize Money | $3,688,825 |
63.50% (87-50) | Career Total W/L | 61.03% (379-242) |
1 | Indoor | 1 |
5 | Titles | 7 |
1 | Total H2H Matches | 1 |
58.33% (21-15) | YTD Win/Loss | 44.12% (15-19) |
1 | YTD Titles | 0 |
J. Fonseca vs B. V. D. Zandschulp Match Preview:
- Joao Fonseca has demonstrated superior second serve effectiveness, winning 48.96% of points compared to Botic Van De Zandschulp’s 43.01% over the past six months.
- Does service return play a role in winning matches? In recent stats, Van De Zandschulp has the upper hand, capturing 46.33% of second serve return points over Fonseca’s 42.98%.
- Interestingly, both players have comparable skills against first serves, but Van De Zandschulp edges ahead with a 26.33% success rate compared to Fonseca’s 23.47%.
- Handling crucial points well, Fonseca excels with a 59.41% breakpoint save rate, slightly outperforming Van De Zandschulp’s 54.96%.
- In terms of overall match success over the past year, Fonseca has a better record, clinching 70.31% of matches, whereas Van De Zandschulp has won 49.18%.
- Both players have identical strengths on hard surfaces, with a win rate of 63%. Could this surface be a deciding factor?
- In direct encounters, Fonseca has outperformed Van De Zandschulp, winning their only previous match and sets 2-0.
- Performance in deciding sets reveals Fonseca’s advantage, having clinched 67% compared to Van De Zandschulp’s 47% over the last year.
- Analyzing the caliber of opposition faced, Fonseca has battled higher-ranked players, averaging opponent ranks of 106.19 versus Van De Zandschulp’s average of 138.77.
Editorial Prediction (October 14, 2025, UTC):
As we look closely at the recent performances of both players, Joao Fonseca has demonstrated a notable edge in several key areas.
Fonseca’s superior second serve performance, along with a slightly better record of saving breakpoints, equips him with vital in-match strategic advantages.
While Botic Van De Zandschulp has shown strength in return games, particularly against second serves, his overall match success rate trails Fonseca significantly.
Adding to this, Fonseca's recent track record against higher-ranked players and his resilience in deciding sets suggest a player in fine form. As such, Joao Fonseca is the likely winner in their upcoming encounter.
Joao Fonseca vs Botic Van De Zandschulp Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
J. Fonseca vs B. V. D. Zandschulp H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
1 | H2H Matches Won | 1 |
2 | Sets Won | 2 |
24 | Games Won | 24 |
13 | Aces (Total) | 19 |
3 | Total Double Faults | 7 |
1:47:12 | Average Match Time | 1:47:12 |
68% (106/157) | 1st Serve % | 68% (101/148) |
75% (79/106) | 1st Serve Win % | 83% (84/101) |
51% (26/51) | 2nd Serve Win % | 38% (18/47) |
43% (3/7) | Break Pts Won % | 38% (3/8) |
31% (46/148) | Return Points Win % | 33% (52/157) |
50% (1/2) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 50% (1/2) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/1) |
0% (0/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
J. Fonseca Recent Matches Played
B. V. D. Zandschulp Recent Matches Played

J. Fonseca vs B. V. D. Zandschulp Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
63.50% (87/50) | YTD Win/Loss | 61.03% (379/242) |
60.53% (207/135) | Sets Win/Loss | 57.97% (866/628) |
53.00% (1734/1538) | Games Win/Loss | 52.99% (7504/6656) |
73.81% (31/11) | Hard Win/Loss | 57.81% (74/54) |
59.68% (37/25) | Clay Win/Loss | 61.59% (178/111) |
66.67% (14/7) | Indoor Hard W/L | 64.97% (115/62) |
41.67% (5/7) | Grass Win/Loss | 44.44% (12/15) |
0.44 | Aces Per Game | 0.44 |
713 | Aces Total | 3067 |
0.18 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.33 |
293 | Total Double Faults | 2272 |
1:43:52 | Average Match Time | 1:36:46 |
205.36 | Average Opponent Rank | 391.75 |
64% (6415/9962) | 1st Serve % | 62% (25471/41363) |
70% (4520/6415) | 1st Serve Win % | 72% (18237/25471) |
53% (1889/3547) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (7640/15895) |
39% (401/1029) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (1870/4348) |
39% (4017/10398) | Return Points Win % | 41% (17350/42741) |
64.71% (11/6) | Slam W/L | 58.93% (33/23) |
50.00% (7/7) | Masters W/L | 48.15% (26/28) |
71.43% (5/2) | Cups W/L | 60.00% (12/8) |
60.00% (15/10) | Main Tour W/L | 51.68% (77/72) |
65.52% (38/20) | Challenger W/L | 63.33% (76/44) |
68.75% (11/5) | Futures W/L | 69.82% (155/67) |
62% (75/121) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 62% (351/565) |
73% (11/15) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 49% (21/43) |
56% (36/64) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 53% (106/200) |
55% (26/47) | Deciding Set Win % | 57% (116/203) |
89% (80/71) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (356/317) |
11% (80/9) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (356/38) |
26% (57/15) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 23% (263/61) |