Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Johan Nikles vs Gonzalo Lama Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Nikles vs Lama analysis and find out who is favored!
Johan Nikles vs Gonzalo Lama Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Nikles has won 44.11% of points on his second serve, while Lama has won 52.34%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Nikles, in recent form, has won 54.57% of his opponent's second serve points, while Lama has won 46.23%. The same stats for first serve returns are 41.49% and 23.53% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Nikles has saved 56.57% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Lama has saved 57.69% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Nikles has won 65.63% of matches played (W/L 21/ 11), with Lama winning 43.24% (W/L 16/ 21) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Nikles has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 60% (W/L 70/ 46), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 25% (W/L 3/ 9). Lama has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 60% (W/L 362/ 245), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Nikles has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 71.43% of matches (W/L 20/ 8), where as Lama has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 42.86% of matches (W/L 12/ 16). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Nikles winning 2 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Nikles winning 4 and Lama winning 1. The last match between Nikles and Lama was at the M15 Cairo, 14-01-2021, Second, Clay with Johan Nikles getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:55:30.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Nikles and Lama have played a deciding set 1 times, with Nikles winning 1 times and Lama 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Nikles winning 1, and Lama 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Nikles has played against opponents with an average rank of 81.03 while Lama has played against players with an average rank of 338.43.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Nikles has won 38% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Lama has won 77% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Nikles has converted 52.32% of breakpoint opportunities, and Lama has converted 10% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Nikles 2 - 0 Lama
868
Rank
256
High
27
Age
R
Plays
2
Total0
0
Hard0
2
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
528
Rank
160
High
30
Age
R
Plays
L
L
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
L
Form
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
58% (263-191)
Career Total W/L
57% (381-282)
66% (21-11)
YTD W/L
0% (0-1)
$11,650
Career Prize Money
$18,335
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Johan Nikles | Gonzalo Lama |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 1 |
| Games Won | 28 | 20 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 4 |
| DFs (Total) | 5 | 5 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:55:30 | 1:55:30 |
| 1st Serve % | 69% (92/133) | 67% (104/156) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 72% (66/92) | 58% (60/104) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 49% (20/41) | 42% (22/52) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 47% (9/19) | 83% (5/6) |
| Return Points W% | 47% (74/156) | 35% (47/133) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-3 |
Stats 
Johan Nikles
Player
Gonzalo Lama
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve %
58%
(
38 of
65)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
12 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
32 of
65)
65
Total Points Won
45
|
||||
| 6-3 3-6 7-6(1) |
Stats
Johan Nikles
Player
Gonzalo Lama
69%
(
61 of
88)
1st Serve %
73%
(
66 of
91)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
1
70%
(
43 of
61)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
38 of
66)
37%
(
10 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
83%
(
5 of
6)
40%
(
35 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
42 of
91)
95
Total Points Won
84
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Johan Nikles | Gonzalo Lama |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 66% (21/11) | 0% (0/1) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 65% (46/25) | 0% (0/2) |
| Games Win/Loss | 57% (357/268) | 14% (2/12) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 60% (3/2) | 0% (0/1) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 69% (18/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.02 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 5 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.15 | 0.29 |
| DFs Total | 47 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:5:22 | 1:10:1 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 81.03 | 481 |
| 1st Serve % | 69% (959/1392) | 38% (17/45) |
| 1st Serve W% | 59% (569/959) | 47% (8/17) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 44% (191/433) | 36% (10/28) |
| BPs Won% Total | 52% (79/151) | 0% (0/3) |
| Return Pts W% | 46% (617/1349) | 27% (12/44) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 25% (1/3) | 0% (0/1) |
| Futures W/L | 71% (20/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 65% (20/31) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 75% (3/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 38% (3/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 84% (25/21) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 16% (25/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (7/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Johan Nikles Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Evan Furness
Player
Johan Nikles
71%
(
50 of
70)
1st Serve %
61%
(
44 of
72)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
40%
(
28 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
36 of
72)
78
Total Points Won
64
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jerome Kym
Player
Johan Nikles
69%
(
72 of
104)
1st Serve %
73%
(
67 of
92)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
1
61%
(
44 of
72)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
32 of
67)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
42%
(
44 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
48 of
92)
108
Total Points Won
88
|
6-7(6) 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Johan Nikles
Player
Seita Watanabe
86%
(
73 of
85)
1st Serve %
75%
(
71 of
95)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
58%
(
42 of
73)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
38 of
71)
42%
(
5 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
45%
(
38 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
46 of
95)
93
Total Points Won
87
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Johan Nikles
Player
Matteo Fondriest
67%
(
45 of
67)
1st Serve %
58%
(
31 of
53)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
32%
(
7 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
42%
(
28 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
29 of
53)
68
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-4 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Matthew Dellavedova
Player
Johan Nikles
73%
(
55 of
75)
1st Serve %
73%
(
37 of
51)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
64%
(
35 of
55)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
9 of
14)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
37%
(
28 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
73
Total Points Won
53
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Arthur Gea
Player
Johan Nikles
75%
(
39 of
52)
1st Serve %
71%
(
47 of
66)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
64%
(
25 of
39)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
24 of
47)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
35%
(
18 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
35 of
66)
69
Total Points Won
49
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Johan Nikles
Player
Matthew Dellavedova
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve %
64%
(
18 of
28)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
65%
(
24 of
37)
1st Serve Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
40%
(
20 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
79%
(
22 of
28)
52
Total Points Won
26
|
6-2 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Stefan Popovic
Player
Johan Nikles
78%
(
62 of
80)
1st Serve %
67%
(
64 of
95)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
69%
(
43 of
62)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
43 of
64)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
34%
(
27 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
41 of
95)
94
Total Points Won
81
|
3-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Johan Nikles
51%
(
25 of
49)
1st Serve %
54%
(
30 of
56)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
68%
(
17 of
25)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
6 of
26)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
39%
(
19 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
34 of
56)
64
Total Points Won
41
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Gonzalo Lama Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Edan Leshem
Player
Gonzalo Lama
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve %
38%
(
17 of
45)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
27%
(
12 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
59
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Joao Lucas Reis Da Silva
Player
Gonzalo Lama
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve %
59%
(
27 of
46)
8
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
59
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Wilson Leite
Player
Gonzalo Lama
59%
(
58 of
98)
1st Serve %
65%
(
55 of
85)
11
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
0
81%
(
47 of
58)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
39 of
55)
50%
(
20 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
20 of
30)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
32%
(
31 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
26 of
85)
93
Total Points Won
90
|
7-6(10) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Gonzalo Lama
Player
Ignacio Carou
58%
(
41 of
71)
1st Serve %
59%
(
50 of
85)
9
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
4
85%
(
35 of
41)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
36 of
50)
67%
(
20 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
10%
(
1 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
23%
(
16 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
32 of
85)
87
Total Points Won
69
|
6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Adolfo Daniel Vallejo
Player
Gonzalo Lama
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve %
50%
(
23 of
46)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
15 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
59
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Gonzalo Lama
Player
Facundo Juarez
60%
(
37 of
62)
1st Serve %
71%
(
39 of
55)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
86%
(
32 of
37)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
26%
(
16 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
21 of
55)
67
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Murkel Alejandro Dellien Velasco
Player
Gonzalo Lama
68%
(
71 of
104)
1st Serve %
52%
(
66 of
127)
7
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
3
75%
(
53 of
71)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
48 of
66)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
27 of
61)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
33%
(
34 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
52 of
127)
122
Total Points Won
109
|
6-7(2) 6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Gonzalo Lama
Player
Hernan Casanova
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve %
68%
(
25 of
37)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
47%
(
15 of
32)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
50%
(
23 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
45
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 0-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lorenzo Claverie
Player
Gonzalo Lama
54%
(
47 of
87)
1st Serve %
56%
(
53 of
94)
20
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
10
89%
(
42 of
47)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
42 of
53)
60%
(
24 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
0%
(
0 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
24%
(
21 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
30 of
94)
96
Total Points Won
85
|
7-6(3) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Luciano Darderi
Player
Gonzalo Lama
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve %
69%
(
34 of
49)
7
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
4
92%
(
24 of
26)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
8 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
55
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Nikles Vs Lama Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
