Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
John-Patrick Smith vs Roy Hobbs Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Smith vs Hobbs analysis and find out who is favored!
John-Patrick Smith vs Roy Hobbs Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Smith has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Hobbs has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Smith, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Hobbs has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Smith has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Hobbs has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Smith has won 50% of matches played (W/L 1/ 1), with Hobbs winning 0% (W/L 0/ 3) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Smith has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 55% (W/L 174/ 143), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 49% (W/L 18/ 19). Hobbs has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 50% (W/L 4/ 4), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 36% (W/L 69/ 125).
- Player level: In the last year, Smith has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 1/ 1), where as Hobbs has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/ 3). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Smith winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Smith winning 2 and Hobbs winning 0. The last match between Smith and Hobbs was at the Singapore Tennis Open - Singapore, 20-02-2021, Q1 round, I.hard with John-Patrick Smith getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:47:46.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Smith and Hobbs have played a deciding set 0 times, with Smith winning 0 times and Hobbs 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Smith winning 0, and Hobbs 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Smith has played against opponents with an average rank of 313.5 while Hobbs has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Smith has won 100% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Hobbs has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Smith has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Hobbs has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Smith 1 - 0 Hobbs
864
Rank
108
High
35
Age
L
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
34
Age
R
Plays
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
Form
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
54% (294-251)
Career Total W/L
36% (76-133)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$377,555
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | John-Patrick Smith | Roy Hobbs |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 2 |
| Aces (Total) | 2 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:47:46 | 0:47:46 |
| 1st Serve % | 86% (31/36) | 66% (37/56) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 77% (24/31) | 49% (18/37) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 80% (4/5) | 32% (6/19) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 56% (5/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 57% (32/56) | 22% (8/36) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-1 |
Stats 
John-Patrick Smith
Player
Roy Hobbs
86%
(
31 of
36)
1st Serve %
66%
(
37 of
56)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
80%
(
4 of
5)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
8 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
32 of
56)
60
Total Points Won
32
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | John-Patrick Smith | Roy Hobbs |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
John-Patrick Smith Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Kyle Seelig
Player
John-Patrick Smith
67%
(
46 of
69)
1st Serve %
71%
(
48 of
68)
3
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
24 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
32 of
68)
77
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(1) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
John-Patrick Smith
Player
Kiranpal Pannu
66%
(
54 of
82)
1st Serve %
51%
(
52 of
102)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
9
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
38 of
52)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
21 of
50)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
33%
(
27 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
43 of
102)
98
Total Points Won
86
|
3-6 7-6(2) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Yosuke Watanuki
Player
John-Patrick Smith
61%
(
22 of
36)
1st Serve %
58%
(
33 of
57)
12
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
86%
(
19 of
22)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
79%
(
11 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
17%
(
6 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
30 of
57)
60
Total Points Won
33
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Billy Harris
Player
John-Patrick Smith
58%
(
42 of
73)
1st Serve %
57%
(
33 of
58)
9
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
0
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
23 of
33)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
40%
(
29 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
26 of
58)
70
Total Points Won
61
|
6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Thomas Fabbiano
Player
John-Patrick Smith
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve %
71%
(
36 of
51)
3
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
1
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
30%
(
16 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
61
Total Points Won
43
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Roberto Carballes Baena
Player
John-Patrick Smith
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve %
63%
(
39 of
62)
0
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
3
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
38%
(
8 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
38%
(
20 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
33 of
62)
65
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Radu Albot
Player
John-Patrick Smith
66%
(
65 of
99)
1st Serve %
70%
(
68 of
97)
8
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
2
72%
(
47 of
65)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
45 of
68)
59%
(
20 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
32%
(
32 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
36 of
97)
103
Total Points Won
93
|
6-7(6) 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Max Purcell
Player
John-Patrick Smith
58%
(
46 of
79)
1st Serve %
66%
(
53 of
80)
9
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
2
78%
(
36 of
46)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
34 of
53)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
33%
(
26 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
34 of
80)
87
Total Points Won
72
|
3-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Matthew Ebden
Player
John-Patrick Smith
56%
(
31 of
55)
1st Serve %
74%
(
58 of
78)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
36 of
58)
75%
(
18 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
25%
(
14 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
34 of
78)
75
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
John-Patrick Smith
Player
Oscar Manuel Sanchez Hirales
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve %
65%
(
40 of
62)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
86%
(
25 of
29)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
17 of
40)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
10 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
35 of
62)
66
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Roy Hobbs Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 7-5 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Nitin Kumar Sinha
Player
Roy Hobbs
100%
(
93 of
93)
1st Serve %
100%
(
83 of
83)
-
Aces
-
-
Double Faults
-
67%
(
62 of
93)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
49 of
83)
0%
(
0 of
0)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
31 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
34 of
83)
96
Total Points Won
80
|
6-7(1) 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kazuma Kawachi
Player
Roy Hobbs
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve %
59%
(
33 of
56)
2
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
11 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
61
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tommy Czaplinski
Player
Roy Hobbs
44%
(
31 of
71)
1st Serve %
59%
(
40 of
68)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
40%
(
16 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
48%
(
34 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
36 of
68)
73
Total Points Won
66
|
4-6 6-2 10-8 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Roy Hobbs
Player
Blake Bayldon
67%
(
45 of
67)
1st Serve %
65%
(
51 of
79)
1
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
5
78%
(
35 of
45)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
32 of
51)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
31%
(
21 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
34 of
79)
80
Total Points Won
66
|
6-3 6-7(5) 10-5 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Minhtuan Pham
Player
Roy Hobbs
60%
(
28 of
47)
1st Serve %
45%
(
23 of
51)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
14 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
62
Total Points Won
36
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Roy Hobbs
Player
Muhammad Hidayatul Rezky Djufri
57%
(
28 of
49)
1st Serve %
64%
(
43 of
67)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
54%
(
15 of
28)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
18 of
43)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
45%
(
22 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
40 of
67)
67
Total Points Won
49
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Issei Okamura
Player
Roy Hobbs
64%
(
35 of
55)
1st Serve %
48%
(
31 of
65)
9
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
6
83%
(
29 of
35)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
23 of
31)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
25%
(
14 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
28 of
65)
69
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Anapat Timangkul
Player
Roy Hobbs
70%
(
62 of
89)
1st Serve %
69%
(
35 of
51)
2
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
2
68%
(
42 of
62)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
27 of
35)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
10 of
16)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
39%
(
35 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
27%
(
14 of
51)
68
Total Points Won
72
|
4-6 6-3 10-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 7-5 6-2 | H2H | |||
view more
Smith Vs Hobbs Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
