Jonathan Binding vs Adam Neff Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Binding vs Neff analysis and find out who is favored!
Jonathan Binding vs Adam Neff Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Binding has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Neff has won 40.78%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Binding, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Neff has won 56.59%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 31.21% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Binding has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Neff has saved 57.14% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Binding has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Neff winning 43.75% (W/L 7/ 9) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Binding has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 56% (W/L 52/ 41), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 46% (W/L 19/ 22). Neff has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 60% (W/L 3/ 2), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 33% (W/L 2/ 4).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Binding winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Binding winning 2 and Neff winning 1. The last match between Binding and Neff was at the USA F26 (Decatur), 31-07-2017, Q2 round, Hard with Jonathan Binding getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Binding and Neff have played a deciding set 1 times, with Binding winning 1 times and Neff 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Binding winning 1, and Neff 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Binding has played against opponents with an average rank of while Neff has played against players with an average rank of 207.56.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Binding has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Neff has won 38% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Binding has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Neff has converted 50% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Binding 1 - 0 Neff
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
N/A
Rank
High
31
Age
L
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
830
Rank
827
High
22
Age
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
53% (85-75)
Career Total W/L
42% (11-15)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-1)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Jonathan Binding | Adam Neff |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
Games Won | 14 | 16 |
Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1-6 7-6(5) 6-4 |
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Jonathan Binding | Adam Neff |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 25% (4/12) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0.5 |
Aces Total | 0 | 4 |
DFs per game | 0 | 1 |
DFs Total | 0 | 8 |
Avg Match Time | N/A | 1:18:35 |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 75 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 57% (41/72) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 59% (24/41) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 39% (12/31) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 13% (5/38) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Jonathan Binding Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF |
Finn Murgett
Player
Jonathan Binding
55%
(
29 of
53)
1st Serve %
70%
(
32 of
46)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
17 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
21 of
46)
57
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Jonathan Binding
Player
Nicholas Jovanovski
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve %
49%
(
27 of
55)
6
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
6
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
62
Total Points Won
37
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 |
Leonardo Catani
Player
Jonathan Binding
57%
(
45 of
79)
1st Serve %
56%
(
46 of
82)
3
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
10
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
32 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
35 of
82)
82
Total Points Won
79
|
7-6(4) 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Marco Brugnerotto
Player
Jonathan Binding
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve %
40%
(
29 of
73)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
10
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
20 of
44)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
16 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
37 of
73)
69
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Jonathan Binding
Player
Suraj R Prabodh
64%
(
53 of
83)
1st Serve %
56%
(
48 of
85)
5
Aces
3
11
Double Faults
3
79%
(
42 of
53)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
31 of
48)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
27 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
31 of
85)
87
Total Points Won
81
|
7-6(4) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
Q2 |
Jonathan Binding
Player
Anvit Bendre
58%
(
35 of
60)
1st Serve %
62%
(
29 of
47)
3
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
0
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
10 of
18)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
37%
(
22 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
22 of
47)
60
Total Points Won
47
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-3 4-6 10-8 | H2H | |||
QF |
Dalwinder Singh
Player
Jonathan Binding
60%
(
30 of
50)
1st Serve %
63%
(
49 of
78)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
12
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
35 of
49)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
17%
(
1 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
28%
(
14 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
30 of
78)
66
Total Points Won
62
|
2-6 6-4 10-7 | H2H |
view more
Adam Neff Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Jordan Thompson
Player
Adam Neff
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve %
57%
(
41 of
72)
8
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
8
88%
(
23 of
26)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
83%
(
10 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
13%
(
5 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
36 of
72)
69
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Learner Tien
Player
Adam Neff
58%
(
32 of
55)
1st Serve %
48%
(
22 of
46)
1
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
4
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
39%
(
9 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
6 of
24)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
38%
(
21 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
61
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Adam Neff
Player
Finn Murgett
48%
(
36 of
75)
1st Serve %
52%
(
27 of
52)
6
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
5
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
49%
(
19 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
40%
(
30 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
27 of
52)
72
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Adam Neff
Player
Jim Hendrikx
34%
(
21 of
61)
1st Serve %
51%
(
37 of
72)
5
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
6
76%
(
16 of
21)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
45%
(
18 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
11 of
35)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
44%
(
27 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
41 of
72)
75
Total Points Won
58
|
6-1 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Eliot Spizzirri
Player
Adam Neff
60%
(
51 of
85)
1st Serve %
41%
(
31 of
76)
3
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
9
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
21 of
31)
53%
(
18 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
18 of
45)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
39%
(
33 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
37 of
76)
89
Total Points Won
72
|
6-4 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Colin Markes
Player
Adam Neff
68%
(
50 of
73)
1st Serve %
50%
(
53 of
105)
1
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
10
80%
(
40 of
50)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
35 of
53)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
17%
(
2 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
19 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
42 of
105)
96
Total Points Won
82
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Adam Neff
Player
Rei Sakamoto
48%
(
20 of
42)
1st Serve %
48%
(
28 of
58)
8
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
5
95%
(
19 of
20)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
18 of
28)
77%
(
17 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
6 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
26 of
58)
62
Total Points Won
38
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Kareem Allaf
Player
Adam Neff
58%
(
44 of
76)
1st Serve %
50%
(
40 of
80)
10
Aces
12
3
Double Faults
9
77%
(
34 of
44)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
33 of
40)
59%
(
19 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
30%
(
23 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
27 of
80)
80
Total Points Won
76
|
3-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Nicholas Godsick
Player
Adam Neff
60%
(
25 of
42)
1st Serve %
49%
(
19 of
39)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
7
92%
(
23 of
25)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
14 of
19)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
3 of
20)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
11 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
53
Total Points Won
28
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Alfredo Perez
Player
Adam Neff
48%
(
15 of
31)
1st Serve %
52%
(
12 of
23)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
87%
(
13 of
15)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
32%
(
10 of
31)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
34
Total Points Won
20
|
6-1 1-0 ret. | H2H |
view more