Jordan Correia Passos Do Carmo vs Flemming Peters Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Carmo vs Peters analysis and find out who is favored!
Jordan Correia Passos Do Carmo vs Flemming Peters Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Carmo has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Peters has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Carmo, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Peters has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Carmo has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Peters has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Carmo has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Peters winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Carmo has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 63% (W/L 153/ 91), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Peters has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 54% (W/L 148/ 128), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 33% (W/L 2/ 4).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Carmo winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Carmo winning 2 and Peters winning 1. The last match between Carmo and Peters was at the Turkey F35 (Antalya), 08-11-2018, Second, Clay with Jordan Correia Passos Do Carmo getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:31:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Carmo and Peters have played a deciding set 1 times, with Carmo winning 1 times and Peters 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Carmo winning 0, and Peters 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Carmo has played against opponents with an average rank of while Peters has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Carmo has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Peters has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Carmo has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Peters has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Carmo 1 - 0 Peters
2
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
2
Minor
Ret.
Rank
400
High
26
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
High
28
Age
R
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
62% (168-104)
Career Total W/L
53% (168-152)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Jordan Correia Passos Do Carmo | Flemming Peters |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
Games Won | 16 | 13 |
Aces (Total) | 3 | 1 |
DFs (Total) | 2 | 3 |
Avg Match Time | 2:31:0 | 2:31:0 |
1st Serve % | 49% (44/89) | 60% (64/106) |
1st Serve Win% | 52% (23/44) | 56% (36/64) |
2nd Serve Win% | 58% (26/45) | 43% (18/42) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 35% (7/20) | 50% (5/10) |
Return Points W% | 49% (52/106) | 45% (40/89) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
4-6 6-4 6-3 |
Jordan Correia Passos Do Carmo
Player
Flemming Peters
49%
(
44 of
89)
1st Serve %
60%
(
64 of
106)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
52%
(
23 of
44)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
36 of
64)
58%
(
26 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
18 of
42)
35%
(
7 of
20)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
45%
(
40 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
52 of
106)
101
Total Points Won
94
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Jordan Correia Passos Do Carmo | Flemming Peters |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | N/A | N/A |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Jordan Correia Passos Do Carmo Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Bogdan Ionut Apostol
Player
Jordan Correia Passos Do Carmo
56%
(
35 of
62)
1st Serve %
52%
(
32 of
61)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
39%
(
24 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
28 of
61)
66
Total Points Won
57
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Andrey Chepelev
Player
Jordan Correia Passos Do Carmo
83%
(
30 of
36)
1st Serve %
51%
(
23 of
45)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
33%
(
2 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
12 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
21 of
45)
45
Total Points Won
36
|
6-4 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
R1 |
Jordan Correia Passos Do Carmo
Player
Richard Zusman
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve %
61%
(
39 of
64)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
13 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
32 of
64)
65
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Berk Ilkel
Player
Jordan Correia Passos Do Carmo
58%
(
53 of
91)
1st Serve %
63%
(
55 of
87)
0
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
6
60%
(
32 of
53)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
33 of
55)
42%
(
16 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
53%
(
8 of
15)
Break Points Won
86%
(
6 of
7)
47%
(
43 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
41 of
87)
89
Total Points Won
89
|
7-5 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Jordan Correia Passos Do Carmo
Player
Lukas Hellum Lilleengen
60%
(
28 of
47)
1st Serve %
58%
(
35 of
60)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
31 of
60)
65
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
Jordan Correia Passos Do Carmo
Player
Philipp Pavlenko
68%
(
64 of
94)
1st Serve %
65%
(
48 of
74)
0
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
2
66%
(
42 of
64)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
40%
(
38 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
34 of
74)
90
Total Points Won
78
|
7-6(7) 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-4 7-5 | H2H | |||
QF |
Lucas Catarina
Player
Jordan Correia Passos Do Carmo
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve %
53%
(
29 of
55)
5
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
20 of
29)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
17 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
26 of
55)
61
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Jordan Correia Passos Do Carmo
Player
Youcef Rihane
66%
(
38 of
58)
1st Serve %
46%
(
22 of
48)
6
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
4
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
17 of
22)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
7 of
26)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
33%
(
19 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
63
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Jordan Correia Passos Do Carmo
Player
Maks Kasnikowski
66%
(
44 of
67)
1st Serve %
57%
(
33 of
58)
6
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
80%
(
35 of
44)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
24 of
33)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
31%
(
21 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
20 of
58)
66
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H |
view more
Flemming Peters Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 |
George Houghton
Player
Flemming Peters
65%
(
40 of
62)
1st Serve %
67%
(
47 of
70)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
36 of
70)
76
Total Points Won
56
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
Shendrit Deari
Player
Flemming Peters
60%
(
32 of
53)
1st Serve %
52%
(
26 of
50)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
4
66%
(
21 of
32)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
38%
(
8 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
45%
(
24 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
55
Total Points Won
48
|
2-6 6-1 10-4 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-1 6-0 | H2H | |||
QF | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-3 0-6 10-6 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 2-6 7-5 10-3 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 7-5 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-0 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-1 4-6 10-8 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 2-6 6-3 10-7 | H2H |
view more