Jose Statham vs Anapat Timangkul Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Statham vs Timangkul analysis and find out who is favored!
Jose Statham vs Anapat Timangkul Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Statham has won 49.05% of points on his second serve, while Timangkul has won 37.62%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Statham, in recent form, has won 50.13% of his opponent's second serve points, while Timangkul has won 51.72%. The same stats for first serve returns are 28.23% and 23.63% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Statham has saved 58.51% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Timangkul has saved 52.5% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Statham has won 42.55% of matches played (W/L 20/ 27), with Timangkul winning 0% (W/L 0/ 14) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Statham has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 61% (W/L 19/ 12), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 40% (W/L 4/ 6). Timangkul has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 12% (W/L 3/ 23), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 12% (W/L 3/ 23).
- Player level: In the last year, Statham has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 41.46% of matches (W/L 17/ 24), where as Timangkul has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/ 13). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Statham winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Statham winning 2 and Timangkul winning 0. The last match between Statham and Timangkul was at the M15 Chiang Rai, 21-06-2022, First, Hard with Jose Statham getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Statham and Timangkul have played a deciding set 0 times, with Statham winning 0 times and Timangkul 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Statham winning 0, and Timangkul 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Statham has played against opponents with an average rank of 315.51 while Timangkul has played against players with an average rank of 90.29.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Statham has won 45% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Timangkul has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Statham has converted 45.07% of breakpoint opportunities, and Timangkul has converted 61.54% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Statham 1 - 0 Timangkul
12
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
12
Minor
621
Rank
279
High
36
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
21
Age
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
57% (603-450)
Career Total W/L
12% (3-23)
60% (3-2)
YTD W/L
0% (0-3)
$33,515
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Jose Statham | Anapat Timangkul |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 12 | 3 |
Aces (Total) | 10 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 1 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1:0:0 | 1:0:0 |
1st Serve % | 62% (23/37) | 71% (29/41) |
1st Serve Win% | 91% (21/23) | 48% (14/29) |
2nd Serve Win% | 79% (11/14) | 42% (5/12) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 57% (4/7) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Points W% | 54% (22/41) | 14% (5/37) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-2 6-1 |
Jose Statham
Player
Anapat Timangkul
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve %
71%
(
29 of
41)
10
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
91%
(
21 of
23)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
79%
(
11 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
5 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
54
Total Points Won
24
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Jose Statham | Anapat Timangkul |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 60% (3/2) | 0% (0/3) |
Sets Win/Loss | 64% (7/4) | 14% (1/6) |
Games Win/Loss | 52% (59/55) | 25% (15/44) |
Hard Win/Loss | 67% (2/1) | 0% (0/3) |
Clay Win/Loss | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.33 | 0 |
Aces Total | 18 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0.36 | 0.34 |
DFs Total | 20 | 10 |
Avg Match Time | 1:24:3 | 1:7:16 |
Avg Opp Rank | 234.8 | 421.33 |
1st Serve % | 57% (172/302) | 62% (101/164) |
1st Serve W% | 72% (124/172) | 53% (54/101) |
2nd Serve W% | 46% (60/130) | 35% (22/63) |
BPs Won% Total | 53% (10/19) | 40% (2/5) |
Return Pts W% | 35% (98/277) | 31% (44/144) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 60% (3/2) | 0% (0/1) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 60% (3/5) | 0% (0/3) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (3/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/1) |
1st set W, W | 75% (4/3) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 25% (4/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (3/0) |
Jose Statham Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF |
Juan Bautista Torres
Player
Jose Statham
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve %
60%
(
28 of
47)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
20 of
28)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
13 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
22 of
47)
59
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 7-5 6-3 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Colin Sinclair
Player
Jose Statham
63%
(
55 of
88)
1st Serve %
54%
(
59 of
110)
13
Aces
8
4
Double Faults
11
82%
(
45 of
55)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
41 of
59)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
28%
(
25 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
43 of
110)
106
Total Points Won
92
|
6-7(2) 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Jose Statham
Player
Masamichi Imamura
65%
(
53 of
82)
1st Serve %
74%
(
53 of
72)
5
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
2
70%
(
37 of
53)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
39%
(
32 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
31 of
72)
81
Total Points Won
73
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Jose Statham
Player
Toshihide Matsui
51%
(
32 of
63)
1st Serve %
49%
(
33 of
67)
4
Aces
8
5
Double Faults
6
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
24 of
33)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
21 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
29 of
67)
71
Total Points Won
59
|
6-2 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Gonzalo Villanueva
Player
Jose Statham
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve %
55%
(
33 of
60)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
63%
(
24 of
38)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
37%
(
18 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
31 of
60)
62
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Alejandro Tabilo
Player
Jose Statham
63%
(
40 of
63)
1st Serve %
61%
(
33 of
54)
14
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
2
83%
(
33 of
40)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
24 of
33)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
19 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
19 of
54)
63
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Jose Statham
Player
Luca Margaroli
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve %
56%
(
31 of
55)
2
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
6
87%
(
27 of
31)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
23 of
31)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
9 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
24 of
55)
60
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Renzo Olivo
Player
Jose Statham
66%
(
44 of
67)
1st Serve %
65%
(
51 of
79)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
80%
(
35 of
44)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
34 of
51)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
31%
(
21 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
31 of
79)
77
Total Points Won
69
|
6-3 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Blake Mott
Player
Jose Statham
80%
(
44 of
55)
1st Serve %
71%
(
47 of
66)
1
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
6
77%
(
34 of
44)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
32 of
47)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
27%
(
15 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
29 of
66)
69
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H |
view more
Anapat Timangkul Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 |
Jumpei Yamasaki
Player
Anapat Timangkul
56%
(
31 of
55)
1st Serve %
61%
(
43 of
70)
6
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
19 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
70)
70
Total Points Won
55
|
6-2 4-6 10-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Paul Woerner
Player
Anapat Timangkul
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve %
55%
(
24 of
44)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
5
90%
(
26 of
29)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
15 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
60
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Lucas Poullain
Player
Anapat Timangkul
64%
(
25 of
39)
1st Serve %
68%
(
34 of
50)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
88%
(
22 of
25)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
10 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
58
Total Points Won
31
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Rohan Mehra
Player
Anapat Timangkul
65%
(
39 of
60)
1st Serve %
70%
(
44 of
63)
7
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
32%
(
19 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
63)
71
Total Points Won
52
|
7-6(0) 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Matteo Lavizzari
Player
Anapat Timangkul
89%
(
58 of
65)
1st Serve %
67%
(
38 of
57)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
14%
(
1 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
38%
(
25 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
57)
66
Total Points Won
56
|
3-6 6-4 10-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Geni Inoue
Player
Anapat Timangkul
75%
(
43 of
57)
1st Serve %
65%
(
30 of
46)
5
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
36%
(
5 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
37%
(
21 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
62
Total Points Won
41
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Pruchya Isarow
Player
Anapat Timangkul
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve %
62%
(
29 of
47)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
76%
(
13 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
57
Total Points Won
35
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Qian Sun
Player
Anapat Timangkul
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve %
64%
(
25 of
39)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
2 of
14)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
14 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
56
Total Points Won
29
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Julien De Cuyper
Player
Anapat Timangkul
69%
(
43 of
62)
1st Serve %
80%
(
35 of
44)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
39%
(
24 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
62
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Corban Crowther
Player
Anapat Timangkul
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve %
58%
(
26 of
45)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
30%
(
14 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
59
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H |
view more