Joshua Charlton vs Noah Brownrigg Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 12 Aug at 01:44 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
J. Charlton vs N. Brownrigg

AUS
1
Win
Played
0
Win

AUS
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Charlton 1 - 0 Brownrigg
They have played 2 sets in total, with Joshua Charlton winning 2 and Noah Brownrigg winning 0. The last match between Joshua Charlton and Noah Brownrigg was at the M15 Brisbane, 13-08-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Joshua Charlton getting the victory 6-4 7-6(5).
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Charlton | 1 |
| Brownrigg | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) M15 Brisbane(08-13-25)
J. Charlton vs N. Brownrigg H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 56.02% (93-73) | Career Total W/L | 56.67% (17-13) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
J. Charlton vs N. Brownrigg Match Preview:
- How do both players perform on their second serves? Recently, Brownrigg has secured 45.83% of points on their second serve compared to Charlton's 41.94%.
- In returning second serves, Brownrigg has a clear advantage with a success rate of 49.11%, whereas Charlton's is 43.2%.
- Charlton is more successful in returning first serves, achieving 24.89%, while Brownrigg manages 22.22%.
- Under pressure during breakpoints, Charlton excels with a 57.5% save rate against Brownrigg's 48.57%.
- Analyzing matches over the past year, Brownrigg holds a higher win percentage at 61.9%, in contrast to Charlton's 52.94%.
- Both players play their best on Grass, but Brownrigg leads with a 75% win rate compared to Charlton's 63%.
- Charlton and Brownrigg have both predominantly played in lower-tier tournaments, but Brownrigg's win rate in these events (61.9%) surpasses Charlton's (55.32%).
- Against tougher opponents, Brownrigg has faced a higher average rank of 131, whereas Charlton's competition has averaged a 344.2 ranking.
- In match deciders, Charlton outperforms with a 54% win rate in deciding sets, while Brownrigg sits at 38%.
- Charlton is more proficient in converting breakpoints, doing so 22.45% of the time, whereas Brownrigg manages a 17.39% conversion rate.
Editorial Prediction (August 12, 2025, UTC):
This upcoming match promises to be intriguing, with both players showcasing distinct strengths. Brownrigg demonstrates superior second serve performance and excels in returning opponent's second serves, providing a strategic edge.
Charlton, however, is more adept under pressure, with high breakpoint save and conversion rates, and a superior record in deciding sets. Despite a lower overall win rate and playing mostly in lower-tier tournaments, Charlton's calmness under pressure could be pivotal.
Considering all factors, including match history and surface proficiency, it appears that Brownrigg, with their consistency against higher-ranked opponents, has a slight edge.
Therefore, Brownrigg is the predicted winner of this upcoming tennis match based on the comparative analysis.
Joshua Charlton vs Noah Brownrigg Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
J. Charlton vs N. Brownrigg H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 10 |
| 4 | Aces (Total) | 5 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 5 |
| 2:12:22 | Average Match Time | 2:12:22 |
| 76% (57/75) | 1st Serve % | 63% (50/80) |
| 63% (36/57) | 1st Serve Win % | 72% (36/50) |
| 61% (11/18) | 2nd Serve Win % | 37% (11/30) |
| 50% (3/6) | Break Pts Won % | 50% (2/4) |
| 41% (33/80) | Return Points Win % | 37% (28/75) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
J. Charlton Recent Matches Played
N. Brownrigg Recent Matches Played

J. Charlton vs N. Brownrigg Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 56.02% (93/73) | YTD Win/Loss | 56.67% (17/13) |
| 54.17% (208/176) | Sets Win/Loss | 55.71% (39/31) |
| 52.49% (1972/1785) | Games Win/Loss | 52.92% (363/323) |
| 55.97% (75/59) | Hard Win/Loss | 50.00% (11/11) |
| 58.33% (7/5) | Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 25.00% (1/3) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 62.50% (10/6) | Grass Win/Loss | 75.00% (6/2) |
| 0.31 | Aces Per Game | 0.08 |
| 574 | Aces Total | 28 |
| 0.09 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.08 |
| 163 | Total Double Faults | 28 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 325.55 | Average Opponent Rank | 166.83 |
| 70% (5471/7791) | 1st Serve % | 62% (523/846) |
| 68% (3716/5471) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (345/523) |
| 51% (1176/2320) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (152/323) |
| 37% (265/716) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (35/78) |
| 37% (2968/7937) | Return Points Win % | 40% (330/829) |
| 42.86% (6/8) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 57.24% (87/65) | Futures W/L | 56.67% (17/13) |
| 56% (91/163) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 57% (17/30) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 42% (22/52) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 20% (1/5) |
| 57% (30/53) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (5/10) |
| 87% (89/77) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 94% (16/15) |
| 13% (89/12) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 6% (16/1) |
| 21% (77/16) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 14% (14/2) |