Josip Simundza vs James Connel Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan
Published on 16 Oct at 11:30 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
J. Simundza vs J. Connel

CRO
0
Win
Played
1
Win

GBR
0
Win
Played
1
Win
Head-to-head: Simundza 0 - 1 Connel
They have played 3 sets in total, with Josip Simundza winning 1 and James Connel winning 2. The last match between James Connel and Josip Simundza was at the M15 Monastir, 16-10-2025, Round: R2, Surface: Hard, with James Connel getting the victory 6-4 3-6 6-3.
Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Simundza | 0 |
Connel | 1 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R2) M15 Monastir(10-16-25)
J. Simundza vs J. Connel H2H Profile
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
$0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
48.75% (78-82) | Career Total W/L | 75.00% (18-6) |
0 | Hard | 1 |
1 | Titles | 0 |
0 | Total H2H Matches | 1 |
0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
J. Simundza vs J. Connel Match Preview:
- When examining recent form, Josip Simundza has a slight edge in second serve performance, winning 46.43% of points compared to James Connel's 41.94%.
- How does each player's return game compare? Simundza has shown superior return stats, winning 44.76% of opponent's second serve points, whereas Connel stands at 32.50%.
- In first serve returns, Simundza leads with a 25.88% success rate, outpacing Connel's 16.00%, indicating a stronger ability to pressure opponents.
- Under pressure, how do they perform in saving breakpoints? Simundza excels here, saving 50.45% compared to Connel's 36.36%.
- Over the past year, Simundza has competed in more matches with a 52.73% win rate, while Connel has a perfect but limited 100% win rate from just three matches.
- Both players have their best surface win percentage on Hard courts at 50%, suggesting no clear surface advantage.
- Simundza has more experience on the Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K circuit with 53.85% success, compared to Connel's untested record of 100% from three matches.
- Quality of opponents faced leans heavily towards Simundza, with an average opponent rank of 337.53, whereas Connel's opponents have not been ranked, highlighting a disparity in competition level.
- In deciding sets, Simundza has shown resilience, winning 57% of these tight scenarios, while Connel hasn't secured a victory in any.
Editorial Prediction (October 16, 2025, UTC):
Recent statistics show a consistent pattern in Josip Simundza's performance, especially in crucial areas such as second serve effectiveness and break point defense. This suggests a resiliency under pressure that is critical in tight matches.
James Connel, despite having an unblemished record, lacks the breadth of experience and depth of competitive opposition that Simundza has faced over the past year. This raises questions about how he might fare against tougher opponents.
The decisive factors likely to influence the match outcome are Simundza's stronger return game and ability to hold his nerve in deciding sets, areas where he clearly outshines Connel.
Taking all these facts into account, Josip Simundza seems poised to be the more likely victor in the upcoming match.
Josip Simundza vs James Connel Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
J. Simundza vs J. Connel H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
0 | H2H Matches Won | 1 |
1 | Sets Won | 2 |
13 | Games Won | 15 |
2 | Aces (Total) | 9 |
1 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
2:10:38 | Average Match Time | 2:10:38 |
68% (52/76) | 1st Serve % | 65% (60/93) |
63% (33/52) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (42/60) |
63% (15/24) | 2nd Serve Win % | 42% (14/33) |
30% (3/10) | Break Pts Won % | 67% (4/6) |
40% (37/93) | Return Points Win % | 37% (28/76) |
0% (0/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 100% (1/1) |
0% (0/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 100% (1/1) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/1) |
0% (0/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
J. Simundza Recent Matches Played
J. Connel Recent Matches Played

J. Simundza vs J. Connel Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
48.75% (78/82) | YTD Win/Loss | 75.00% (18/6) |
48.09% (176/190) | Sets Win/Loss | 67.92% (36/17) |
48.68% (1737/1831) | Games Win/Loss | 57.03% (284/214) |
47.37% (9/10) | Hard Win/Loss | 78.95% (15/4) |
49.28% (68/70) | Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
33.33% (1/2) | Indoor Hard W/L | 60.00% (3/2) |
0.2 | Aces Per Game | 0.15 |
340 | Aces Total | 36 |
0.18 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.18 |
317 | Total Double Faults | 45 |
1:20:9 | Average Match Time | 1:17:33 |
320.41 | Average Opponent Rank | 304.17 |
57% (4615/8155) | 1st Serve % | 61% (702/1156) |
67% (3083/4615) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (468/702) |
48% (1714/3540) | 2nd Serve Win % | 52% (237/454) |
39% (282/714) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (60/134) |
38% (2970/7798) | Return Points Win % | 43% (515/1190) |
12.50% (1/7) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) |
50.66% (77/75) | Futures W/L | 75.00% (18/6) |
48% (76/158) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 75% (18/24) |
71% (24/34) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 100% (5/5) |
54% (26/48) | Deciding Set Win % | 100% (5/5) |
85% (78/66) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (16/16) |
15% (78/12) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (16/0) |
13% (82/11) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 25% (8/2) |