Josy Daems vs Anouck Vrancken Peeters Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• In recent performance, Daems has won 39.85% of points on their second serve, while Peeters is slightly ahead at 39.96%. Is this distinction significant? Both show closely similar second serve performance.
• Regarding return games, Daems manages to secure 50% of points on opponents' second serves, whereas Peeters leads with 53.44%. Both players fare similarly with first serve returns, with Peeters ahead at 38.02% compared to Daems at 35.39%.
• Under pressure, Daems saves 47.2% of breakpoints, while Peeters stands slightly higher at 49.64%. Could these figures be crucial for in-game predictions?
• Over the past year, Daems has a 55.93% match win rate, whereas Peeters exhibits a stronger performance at 69.12%.
• Daems excels on hard courts with a 61% career win rate, their least favorable surface being clay at 47%. Peeters' best surface is indoor hard courts where they win 81%, but struggles on grass with no wins.
• Daems primarily competes in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments with a success rate of 63.16%, whereas Peeters frequently plays in Challenger/ITF tournaments with slightly higher stakes, achieving a win rate of 64.29%. Does the level of competition impact their head-to-head outcomes?
• Their direct head-to-head record shows Peeters winning their only encounter, securing both sets 6-2, 7-5 in a previous match at the W15 Oslo.
• No tiebreaks or deciding sets have been contested between them, a relevant factor should the match extend.
• Comparing opponent strength, Daems faced players ranked on average at 445.86, while Peeters' opponents averaged a rank of 449.88.
• In matches that go the distance, Daems has a stronger record, winning 75% of deciding sets, compared to Peeters' 70%.
• Lastly, Daems shows a breakpoint conversion of 35.4% in recent matches versus Peeters' higher rate of 44.93%.

Editorial Prediction (August 27, 2025, UTC):

As we anticipate their upcoming match, the statistics between Daems and Peeters highlight key comparative aspects. Peeters slightly outperforms Daems in recent form across several critical metrics including return game stats, under pressure efficiency, and break point conversion. Moreover, Peeters' higher win percentage over the past year suggests superior consistency and performance.

Despite this, Daems holds a minor advantage in deciding sets, indicating resilience in prolonged matches. The surface preferences show Daems has the edge on hard courts while Peeters demonstrates significant prowess on indoor hard courts, matching the surface of their previous encounter, where Peeters claimed victory.

Factoring in their head-to-head record and current form, Peeters appears to be the favorite for this matchup, having already proved dominant in their prior meeting.