Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Juan Manuel Cerundolo vs Matija Pecotic Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Cerundolo vs Pecotic analysis and find out who is favored!
Juan Manuel Cerundolo vs Matija Pecotic Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Cerundolo has won 48.65% of points on his second serve, while Pecotic has won 51.2%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Cerundolo, in recent form, has won 52.98% of his opponent's second serve points, while Pecotic has won 51.22%. The same stats for first serve returns are 34.19% and 41.9% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Cerundolo has saved 49.32% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Pecotic has saved 54.39% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Cerundolo has won 47.69% of matches played (W/L 31/ 34), with Pecotic winning 63.33% (W/L 19/ 11) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Cerundolo has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 63% (W/L 201/ 116), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Pecotic has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 75% (W/L 155/ 51), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 43% (W/L 3/ 4).
- Player level: In the last year, Cerundolo has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 18/ 18), where as Pecotic has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 64.71% of matches (W/L 11/ 6). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Cerundolo has played against opponents with an average rank of 296.94 while Pecotic has played against players with an average rank of 210.97.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Cerundolo has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Pecotic has won 14% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Cerundolo has converted 43.48% of breakpoint opportunities, and Pecotic has converted 45.74% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Cerundolo 0 - 0 Pecotic
153
Rank
79
High
22
Age
L
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
461
Rank
206
High
34
Age
L
Plays
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
L
Form
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
61% (210-133)
Career Total W/L
69% (211-94)
45% (9-11)
YTD W/L
55% (6-5)
$351,575
Career Prize Money
$49,830
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| w/o | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Juan Manuel Cerundolo | Matija Pecotic |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 45% (9/11) | 55% (6/5) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 49% (23/24) | 60% (15/10) |
| Games Win/Loss | 50% (208/209) | 58% (129/95) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/2) | 40% (2/3) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 50% (9/9) | 67% (2/1) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 67% (2/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.17 | 0.24 |
| Aces Total | 34 | 26 |
| DFs per game | 0.28 | 0.29 |
| DFs Total | 58 | 32 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:45:43 | 1:38:42 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 253.4 | 71 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (807/1259) | 57% (389/680) |
| 1st Serve W% | 64% (517/807) | 72% (280/389) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 50% (228/452) | 51% (149/291) |
| BPs Won% Total | 43% (62/144) | 46% (43/94) |
| Return Pts W% | 41% (569/1379) | 45% (341/750) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 50% (4/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 45% (5/6) | 50% (4/4) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 67% (2/1) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 47% (9/19) | 55% (6/11) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 33% (1/3) | 0% (0/2) |
| Deciding Set W% | 33% (2/6) | 0% (0/3) |
| 1st set W, W | 64% (11/7) | 86% (7/6) |
| 1st set W, L | 36% (11/4) | 14% (7/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 22% (9/2) | 0% (4/0) |
Juan Manuel Cerundolo Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Dennis Novak
Player
Juan Manuel Cerundolo
59%
(
30 of
51)
1st Serve %
57%
(
31 of
54)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
13 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
25 of
54)
63
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Stefano Travaglia
Player
Juan Manuel Cerundolo
64%
(
62 of
97)
1st Serve %
60%
(
49 of
81)
0
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
5
61%
(
38 of
62)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
26 of
49)
49%
(
17 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
43%
(
42 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
38 of
81)
93
Total Points Won
85
|
3-6 6-4 4-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Francesco Passaro
Player
Juan Manuel Cerundolo
69%
(
42 of
61)
1st Serve %
68%
(
39 of
57)
5
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
79%
(
33 of
42)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
37%
(
7 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
34%
(
21 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
30 of
57)
70
Total Points Won
48
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Juan Manuel Cerundolo
Player
Joao Lucas Reis Da Silva
59%
(
24 of
41)
1st Serve %
59%
(
23 of
39)
0
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
4
75%
(
18 of
24)
1st Serve Won
22%
(
5 of
23)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
39%
(
16 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
77%
(
30 of
39)
55
Total Points Won
25
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Renzo Olivo
Player
Juan Manuel Cerundolo
76%
(
59 of
78)
1st Serve %
70%
(
43 of
61)
0
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
2
66%
(
39 of
59)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
38%
(
30 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
61)
77
Total Points Won
62
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Juan Manuel Cerundolo
Player
Gabi Adrian Boitan
58%
(
25 of
43)
1st Serve %
66%
(
27 of
41)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
84%
(
21 of
25)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
9 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
55
Total Points Won
29
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Juan Manuel Cerundolo
Player
Guido Ivan Justo
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
64)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
17 of
40)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
31%
(
12 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
37 of
64)
64
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Luciano Darderi
Player
Juan Manuel Cerundolo
51%
(
44 of
86)
1st Serve %
68%
(
58 of
85)
7
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
2
77%
(
34 of
44)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
37 of
58)
55%
(
23 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
34%
(
29 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
32 of
85)
89
Total Points Won
82
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Juan Manuel Cerundolo
Player
Yannick Hanfmann
52%
(
48 of
92)
1st Serve %
58%
(
55 of
95)
3
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
6
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
35 of
55)
61%
(
27 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
37%
(
34 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
38 of
95)
96
Total Points Won
91
|
3-6 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Juan Manuel Cerundolo
Player
Matias Soto
59%
(
37 of
63)
1st Serve %
70%
(
42 of
60)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
29 of
42)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
21 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
25 of
60)
67
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Matija Pecotic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Thanasi Kokkinakis
Player
Matija Pecotic
57%
(
43 of
76)
1st Serve %
62%
(
39 of
63)
12
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
31 of
39)
64%
(
21 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
17%
(
1 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
23 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
18 of
63)
71
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Matija Pecotic
Player
Gerard Campana Lee
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve %
73%
(
33 of
45)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
1
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
35%
(
18 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
59
Total Points Won
38
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Matija Pecotic
Player
Preston Brown
53%
(
26 of
49)
1st Serve %
53%
(
29 of
55)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
7
77%
(
20 of
26)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
37%
(
18 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
33 of
55)
64
Total Points Won
40
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Thai Kwiatkowski
Player
Matija Pecotic
57%
(
24 of
42)
1st Serve %
57%
(
32 of
56)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
71%
(
17 of
24)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
12 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
60
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Matija Pecotic
Player
Aydan Gomez Osorio
59%
(
23 of
39)
1st Serve %
50%
(
28 of
56)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
1
74%
(
17 of
23)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
31%
(
12 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
32 of
56)
59
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matija Pecotic
Player
Evan Bynoe
46%
(
24 of
52)
1st Serve %
70%
(
43 of
61)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
71%
(
17 of
24)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
18 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
61)
66
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Noah Rubin
Player
Matija Pecotic
60%
(
66 of
110)
1st Serve %
53%
(
56 of
105)
1
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
7
64%
(
42 of
66)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
40 of
56)
50%
(
22 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
20 of
49)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
42%
(
46 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
45 of
105)
109
Total Points Won
106
|
5-7 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Matija Pecotic
Player
Joshua Sheehy
59%
(
35 of
59)
1st Serve %
66%
(
43 of
65)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
4
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
67%
(
16 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
31%
(
18 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
65)
72
Total Points Won
52
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Matija Pecotic
Player
Michael Sutanto
58%
(
28 of
48)
1st Serve %
60%
(
39 of
65)
8
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
93%
(
26 of
28)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
21%
(
10 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
65)
69
Total Points Won
44
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Bruno Kuzuhara
Player
Matija Pecotic
73%
(
74 of
102)
1st Serve %
60%
(
45 of
75)
1
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
2
59%
(
44 of
74)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
30 of
45)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
45%
(
46 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
30 of
75)
86
Total Points Won
91
|
7-6(5) 0-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Cerundolo Vs Pecotic Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
