Juan Pablo Canas Garcia vs Ivan MARRERO Curbelo Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Garcia vs Curbelo analysis and find out who is favored!
Juan Pablo Canas Garcia vs Ivan MARRERO Curbelo Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Garcia has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Curbelo has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Garcia, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Curbelo has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Garcia has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Curbelo has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Garcia has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Curbelo winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Garcia has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 60% (W/L 99/ 65), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 52% (W/L 104/ 97). Curbelo has their best career surface win % on , winning % (W/L / ), and worse career win % on , winning % (W/L / ).
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Garcia has played against opponents with an average rank of while Curbelo has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Garcia has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Curbelo has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Garcia has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Curbelo has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Garcia 0 - 0 Curbelo
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
N/A
Rank
High
27
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
25
Age
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
Career Total W/L
YTD W/L
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
YTD Titles
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Juan Pablo Canas Garcia | Ivan MARRERO Curbelo |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Aces pg | 0 | 1st Match |
Aces Total | 0 | 1st Match |
DFs per game | 0 | 1st Match |
DFs Total | 0 | 1st Match |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 1st Match |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Juan Pablo Canas Garcia Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q2 | 4-6 6-2 10-3 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-1 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
QF |
Guy Den Heijer
Player
Juan Pablo Canas Garcia
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve %
63%
(
26 of
41)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
1
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
76%
(
13 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
9 of
15)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
27%
(
12 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
57
Total Points Won
29
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
Juan Pablo Canas Garcia
Player
Fabio Coelho
51%
(
30 of
59)
1st Serve %
58%
(
26 of
45)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
5
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
39%
(
23 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
61
Total Points Won
43
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Juan Pablo Canas Garcia
Player
Peter Sychev
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve %
45%
(
22 of
49)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
29%
(
13 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
57
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 | 7-5 6-2 | H2H | |||
QF | 6-4 3-6 10-3 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 7-5 6-2 | H2H |
view more
Ivan MARRERO Curbelo Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
Andres Andrade
Player
Ivan Marrero Curbelo
54%
(
20 of
37)
1st Serve %
70%
(
30 of
43)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
75%
(
15 of
20)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
32%
(
12 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
52
Total Points Won
28
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Ivan Marrero Curbelo
Player
Enmanuel Munoz
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve %
30%
(
11 of
37)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
10
91%
(
20 of
22)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
56%
(
5 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
5 of
26)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
19%
(
6 of
31)
Rtn Points Won
70%
(
26 of
37)
51
Total Points Won
17
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Nick Hardt
Player
Ivan Marrero Curbelo
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve %
68%
(
43 of
63)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
11 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
35 of
63)
65
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Ivan Marrero Curbelo
Player
Trey Hilderbrand
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve %
62%
(
31 of
50)
4
Aces
10
1
Double Faults
4
85%
(
29 of
34)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
20%
(
10 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
21 of
50)
60
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Ivan Marrero Curbelo
Player
Jelle Sels
65%
(
52 of
80)
1st Serve %
53%
(
36 of
68)
1
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
3
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
36%
(
29 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
28 of
68)
79
Total Points Won
69
|
7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Felix Corwin
Player
Ivan Marrero Curbelo
51%
(
38 of
75)
1st Serve %
63%
(
65 of
104)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
3
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
32 of
65)
49%
(
18 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
33%
(
7 of
21)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
41%
(
31 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
54 of
104)
98
Total Points Won
81
|
6-1 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Ivan Marrero Curbelo
Player
Mitchell Harper
67%
(
47 of
70)
1st Serve %
49%
(
39 of
79)
1
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
8
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
39%
(
9 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
39%
(
27 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
37 of
79)
80
Total Points Won
69
|
7-6(8) 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 3-6 6-1 10-7 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Kiranpal Pannu
Player
Ivan Marrero Curbelo
64%
(
66 of
103)
1st Serve %
70%
(
76 of
109)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
5
61%
(
40 of
66)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
45 of
76)
41%
(
15 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
47%
(
48 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
50 of
109)
105
Total Points Won
107
|
3-6 7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
QF | 2-6 7-6(4) 10-4 | H2H |
view more