Juan Pablo Ficovich vs Camilo UGO Carabelli Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Ficovich vs Carabelli analysis and find out who is favored!
Juan Pablo Ficovich vs Camilo UGO Carabelli Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Ficovich has won 51.68% of points on his second serve, while Carabelli has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Ficovich, in recent form, has won 50.11% of his opponent's second serve points, while Carabelli has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 31.62% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Ficovich has saved 57.44% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Carabelli has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Ficovich has won 50.72% of matches played (W/L 35/ 34), with Carabelli winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Ficovich has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 59% (W/L 303/ 208), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 25% (W/L 1/ 3). Carabelli has their best career surface win % on , winning % (W/L / ), and worse career win % on , winning % (W/L / ).
- Player level: In the last year, Ficovich has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 46% of matches (W/L 23/ 27), where as Carabelli has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Ficovich has played against opponents with an average rank of 324.74 while Carabelli has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Ficovich has won 42% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Carabelli has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Ficovich has converted 42.65% of breakpoint opportunities, and Carabelli has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Ficovich 0 - 0 Carabelli
12
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
N/A
Rank
High
27
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
24
Age
R
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
Career Total W/L
YTD W/L
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
YTD Titles
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Juan Pablo Ficovich | Camilo UGO Carabelli |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 53% (9/8) | N/A |
Sets Win/Loss | 54% (21/18) | N/A |
Games Win/Loss | 52% (198/184) | N/A |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) | N/A |
Clay Win/Loss | 60% (9/6) | N/A |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/1) | N/A |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Aces pg | 0.33 | N/A |
Aces Total | 62 | N/A |
DFs per game | 0.2 | N/A |
DFs Total | 38 | N/A |
Avg Match Time | 1:52:15 | N/A |
Avg Opp Rank | 332.65 | N/A |
1st Serve % | 60% (731/1212) | N/A |
1st Serve W% | 68% (498/731) | N/A |
2nd Serve W% | 54% (258/481) | N/A |
BPs Won% Total | 45% (50/111) | N/A |
Return Pts W% | 39% (475/1204) | N/A |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/2) | N/A |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Challenger W/L | 44% (4/5) | N/A |
Futures W/L | 83% (5/1) | N/A |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 53% (9/17) | N/A |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
TBs Win% (Total) | 43% (3/7) | N/A |
Deciding Set W% | 40% (2/5) | N/A |
1st set W, W | 100% (8/8) | N/A |
1st set W, L | 0% (8/0) | N/A |
1st set L, W | 11% (9/1) | N/A |
Juan Pablo Ficovich Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Denis Kudla
Player
Juan Pablo Ficovich
53%
(
25 of
47)
1st Serve %
46%
(
30 of
65)
5
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
4
88%
(
22 of
25)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
20 of
30)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
12 of
35)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
26%
(
12 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
33 of
65)
68
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
F |
Tristan Boyer
Player
Juan Pablo Ficovich
63%
(
44 of
70)
1st Serve %
66%
(
40 of
61)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
0
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
25 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
28 of
61)
73
Total Points Won
58
|
7-6(6) 6-2 | H2H | ||
SF |
Juan Pablo Ficovich
Player
Murkel Alejandro Dellien Velasco
61%
(
54 of
88)
1st Serve %
62%
(
61 of
98)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
36 of
61)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
43%
(
38 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
46 of
98)
96
Total Points Won
90
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Juan Pablo Ficovich
Player
Stefan Kozlov
60%
(
38 of
63)
1st Serve %
63%
(
37 of
59)
2
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
6
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
22 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
25 of
59)
66
Total Points Won
56
|
7-6(6) 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Juan Pablo Ficovich
Player
Gerard Campana Lee
43%
(
20 of
46)
1st Serve %
65%
(
28 of
43)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
90%
(
18 of
20)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
14 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
56
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Juan Pablo Ficovich
Player
Emiliano Aguilera
59%
(
24 of
41)
1st Serve %
66%
(
35 of
53)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
82%
(
14 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
17%
(
7 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
27 of
53)
61
Total Points Won
33
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
F |
Juan Pablo Ficovich
Player
Dmitry Popko
66%
(
81 of
123)
1st Serve %
59%
(
56 of
95)
4
Aces
15
3
Double Faults
2
69%
(
56 of
81)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
41 of
56)
62%
(
26 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
8)
33%
(
41 of
123)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
30 of
95)
112
Total Points Won
106
|
6-4 6-7(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
SF |
Juan Pablo Ficovich
Player
Eduardo Ribeiro
74%
(
50 of
68)
1st Serve %
64%
(
49 of
76)
6
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
32 of
49)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
32%
(
22 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
30 of
76)
76
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(9) 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Juan Pablo Ficovich
Player
Daniel Dutra Da Silva
53%
(
24 of
45)
1st Serve %
57%
(
25 of
44)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
57
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Juan Pablo Ficovich
Player
Harrison Adams
68%
(
53 of
78)
1st Serve %
59%
(
39 of
66)
5
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
75%
(
40 of
53)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
28 of
39)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
33%
(
26 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
27 of
66)
79
Total Points Won
65
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H |
view more
Camilo UGO Carabelli Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Alvaro Guillen Meza
68%
(
69 of
102)
1st Serve %
75%
(
62 of
83)
4
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
5
68%
(
47 of
69)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
41 of
62)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
39%
(
40 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
32 of
83)
94
Total Points Won
91
|
6-3 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Liam Draxl
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
59%
(
61 of
103)
1st Serve %
72%
(
76 of
106)
6
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
1
77%
(
47 of
61)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
47 of
76)
50%
(
21 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
34%
(
35 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
41 of
106)
109
Total Points Won
100
|
6-4 5-7 7-5 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Ignacio Buse
74%
(
66 of
89)
1st Serve %
73%
(
60 of
82)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
59%
(
39 of
66)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
35 of
60)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
45%
(
40 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
38 of
82)
87
Total Points Won
84
|
7-6(9) 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Matias Soto
81%
(
60 of
74)
1st Serve %
59%
(
61 of
104)
6
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
7
70%
(
42 of
60)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
41 of
61)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
18 of
43)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
34%
(
25 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
45 of
104)
94
Total Points Won
84
|
4-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
F |
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Murkel Alejandro Dellien Velasco
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve %
68%
(
39 of
57)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
45%
(
5 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
16 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
28 of
57)
61
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
SF |
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Thiago Moura Monteiro
66%
(
42 of
64)
1st Serve %
63%
(
48 of
76)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
30 of
48)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
34%
(
22 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
31 of
76)
73
Total Points Won
67
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
QF |
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Goncalo Oliveira
57%
(
54 of
95)
1st Serve %
65%
(
60 of
93)
5
Aces
2
8
Double Faults
6
63%
(
34 of
54)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
35 of
60)
51%
(
21 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
42%
(
40 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
43 of
93)
98
Total Points Won
90
|
4-6 7-6(1) 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Juan Carlos Prado Angelo
61%
(
35 of
57)
1st Serve %
47%
(
37 of
78)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
15 of
41)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
32%
(
18 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
38 of
78)
77
Total Points Won
58
|
7-6(3) 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Adolfo Daniel Vallejo
59%
(
57 of
96)
1st Serve %
67%
(
67 of
100)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
7
65%
(
37 of
57)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
37 of
67)
49%
(
19 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
42%
(
40 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
50 of
100)
106
Total Points Won
90
|
7-6(10) 5-7 4-0 ret. | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Juan Manuel Cerundolo
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
68%
(
43 of
63)
1st Serve %
59%
(
34 of
58)
0
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
2
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
23 of
34)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
37%
(
23 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
27 of
58)
67
Total Points Won
54
|
6-1 7-6(4) | H2H |
view more