Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Juan Pablo Ficovich vs Gianluca Naso Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Ficovich vs Naso analysis and find out who is favored!
Juan Pablo Ficovich vs Gianluca Naso Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Ficovich has won 53.13% of points on his second serve, while Naso has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Ficovich, in recent form, has won 49.21% of his opponent's second serve points, while Naso has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 29.97% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Ficovich has saved 58.76% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Naso has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Ficovich has won 48.53% of matches played (W/L 33/ 35), with Naso winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Ficovich has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 59% (W/L 304/ 209), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 25% (W/L 1/ 3). Naso has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 58% (W/L 410/ 301), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 25% (W/L 1/ 3).
- Player level: In the last year, Ficovich has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 42.86% of matches (W/L 21/ 28), where as Naso has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Ficovich has played against opponents with an average rank of 306.84 while Naso has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Ficovich has won 33% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Naso has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Ficovich has converted 41.11% of breakpoint opportunities, and Naso has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Ficovich 1 - 0 Naso
238
Rank
125
High
27
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
175
High
37
Age
R
Plays
W
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
Form
L
W
L
L
L
W
W
W
L
L
57% (349-268)
Career Total W/L
56% (433-340)
52% (12-11)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$240,230
Career Prize Money
$98,900
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ret. | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Juan Pablo Ficovich | Gianluca Naso |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 52% (12/11) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 53% (27/24) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 51% (255/246) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 40% (2/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 59% (10/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.35 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 85 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.2 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 50 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:46:16 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 306.35 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 60% (948/1584) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 69% (655/948) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 54% (346/636) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 44% (58/133) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 38% (600/1572) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 47% (7/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 83% (5/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 52% (12/23) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 38% (3/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 40% (2/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (11/11) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (11/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 8% (12/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Juan Pablo Ficovich Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats 
Maxime Cressy
Player
Juan Pablo Ficovich
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve %
74%
(
42 of
57)
10
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
0
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
73%
(
11 of
15)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
13 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
25 of
57)
63
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Juan Pablo Ficovich
Player
Bernard Tomic
56%
(
32 of
57)
1st Serve %
53%
(
37 of
70)
6
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
1
91%
(
29 of
32)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
12 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
28 of
70)
73
Total Points Won
54
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Maxime Cressy
Player
Juan Pablo Ficovich
59%
(
36 of
61)
1st Serve %
56%
(
36 of
64)
14
Aces
3
9
Double Faults
4
94%
(
34 of
36)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
15 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
25 of
64)
71
Total Points Won
54
|
7-6(6) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Juan Pablo Ficovich
Player
Goncalo Oliveira
64%
(
45 of
70)
1st Serve %
61%
(
42 of
69)
10
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
7
78%
(
35 of
45)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
33 of
42)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
21 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
26 of
69)
75
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Thiago Agustin Tirante
Player
Juan Pablo Ficovich
56%
(
27 of
48)
1st Serve %
47%
(
33 of
70)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
22 of
33)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
15 of
37)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
33 of
70)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Juan Pablo Ficovich
Player
Elmar Ejupovic
54%
(
29 of
54)
1st Serve %
52%
(
36 of
69)
2
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
9
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
76%
(
19 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
20%
(
11 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
29 of
69)
72
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Denis Kudla
Player
Juan Pablo Ficovich
53%
(
25 of
47)
1st Serve %
46%
(
30 of
65)
5
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
4
88%
(
22 of
25)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
20 of
30)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
12 of
35)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
26%
(
12 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
33 of
65)
68
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Tristan Boyer
Player
Juan Pablo Ficovich
63%
(
44 of
70)
1st Serve %
66%
(
40 of
61)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
0
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
25 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
28 of
61)
73
Total Points Won
58
|
7-6(6) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Juan Pablo Ficovich
Player
Murkel Alejandro Dellien Velasco
61%
(
54 of
88)
1st Serve %
62%
(
61 of
98)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
36 of
61)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
43%
(
38 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
46 of
98)
96
Total Points Won
90
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Juan Pablo Ficovich
Player
Stefan Kozlov
60%
(
38 of
63)
1st Serve %
63%
(
37 of
59)
2
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
6
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
22 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
25 of
59)
66
Total Points Won
56
|
7-6(6) 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Gianluca Naso Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Salvatore Caruso
Player
Gianluca Naso
57%
(
16 of
28)
1st Serve %
48%
(
19 of
40)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
75%
(
12 of
16)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
10 of
28)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
40
Total Points Won
28
|
6-2 1-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Liam Caruana
Player
Gianluca Naso
63%
(
65 of
104)
1st Serve %
61%
(
66 of
109)
8
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
2
69%
(
45 of
65)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
45 of
66)
56%
(
22 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
36%
(
37 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
41 of
109)
108
Total Points Won
105
|
4-6 7-6(7) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gianluca Naso
Player
Roberto Marcora
61%
(
55 of
90)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
63)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
60%
(
33 of
55)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
26 of
40)
60%
(
21 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
40%
(
36 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
63)
82
Total Points Won
71
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-4 7-5 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Kenny de Schepper
Player
Gianluca Naso
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve %
62%
(
40 of
65)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
15 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
65)
66
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
David Guez
Player
Gianluca Naso
67%
(
49 of
73)
1st Serve %
53%
(
37 of
70)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
61%
(
30 of
49)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
41%
(
30 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
39 of
70)
82
Total Points Won
61
|
7-6(4) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Enrique Lopez-Perez
Player
Gianluca Naso
48%
(
24 of
50)
1st Serve %
61%
(
35 of
57)
2
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
3
63%
(
15 of
24)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
69%
(
18 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
34%
(
17 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
31 of
57)
64
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gianluca Naso
Player
Salvatore Caruso
68%
(
45 of
66)
1st Serve %
53%
(
31 of
59)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
23 of
31)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
8 of
28)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
39%
(
26 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
59)
68
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Elias Ymer
Player
Gianluca Naso
72%
(
66 of
92)
1st Serve %
58%
(
45 of
77)
6
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
1
65%
(
43 of
66)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
29 of
45)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
10%
(
1 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
36%
(
33 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
29 of
77)
88
Total Points Won
81
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Ficovich Vs Naso Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
