Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Juan Pablo Ficovich vs Julian Lenz Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Ficovich vs Lenz analysis and find out who is favored!
Juan Pablo Ficovich vs Julian Lenz Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Ficovich has won 53.13% of points on his second serve, while Lenz has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Ficovich, in recent form, has won 49.21% of his opponent's second serve points, while Lenz has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 29.97% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Ficovich has saved 58.76% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Lenz has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Ficovich has won 48.53% of matches played (W/L 33/ 35), with Lenz winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Ficovich has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 59% (W/L 304/ 209), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 25% (W/L 1/ 3). Lenz has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 121/ 95), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 33% (W/L 1/ 2).
- Player level: In the last year, Ficovich has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 42.86% of matches (W/L 21/ 28), where as Lenz has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Ficovich winning 1 times. They have played 6 sets in total, with Ficovich winning 3 and Lenz winning 3. The last match between Ficovich and Lenz was at the Ismaning Challenger, 20-10-2020, First, Carpet with Julian Lenz getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:59:21.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Ficovich and Lenz have played a deciding set 2 times, with Ficovich winning 1 times and Lenz 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Ficovich winning 0, and Lenz 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Ficovich has played against opponents with an average rank of 306.84 while Lenz has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Ficovich has won 33% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Lenz has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Ficovich has converted 41.11% of breakpoint opportunities, and Lenz has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Ficovich 1 - 1 Lenz
238
Rank
125
High
27
Age
R
Plays
1
Total1
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor1
0
Grass0
864
Rank
227
High
31
Age
R
Plays
W
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
Form
L
L
W
W
L
W
W
W
W
L
57% (349-268)
Career Total W/L
55% (207-169)
52% (12-11)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$240,230
Career Prize Money
$25,665
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Juan Pablo Ficovich | Julian Lenz |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 3 | 3 |
| Games Won | 32 | 29 |
| Aces (Total) | 18 | 19 |
| DFs (Total) | 7 | 6 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:59:21 | 1:59:21 |
| 1st Serve % | 57% (104/182) | 58% (103/178) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 79% (82/104) | 76% (78/103) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 50% (39/78) | 51% (38/75) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 75% (6/8) | 20% (4/20) |
| Return Points W% | 35% (62/178) | 34% (61/182) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 100% (1/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5-7 7-5 6-4 |
Stats 
Julian Lenz
Player
Juan Pablo Ficovich
58%
(
57 of
99)
1st Serve %
60%
(
54 of
90)
12
Aces
15
1
Double Faults
5
86%
(
49 of
57)
1st Serve Won
85%
(
46 of
54)
50%
(
21 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
29 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
25 of
90)
95
Total Points Won
94
|
||||
| 4-6 6-3 6-2 |
Stats
Juan Pablo Ficovich
Player
Julian Lenz
54%
(
50 of
92)
1st Serve %
58%
(
46 of
79)
3
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
5
72%
(
36 of
50)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
29 of
46)
48%
(
20 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
13%
(
2 of
15)
39%
(
36 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
33 of
79)
89
Total Points Won
82
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Juan Pablo Ficovich | Julian Lenz |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 52% (12/11) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 53% (27/24) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 51% (255/246) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 40% (2/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 59% (10/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.35 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 85 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.2 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 50 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:46:16 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 306.35 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 60% (948/1584) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 69% (655/948) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 54% (346/636) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 44% (58/133) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 38% (600/1572) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 47% (7/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 83% (5/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 52% (12/23) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 38% (3/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 40% (2/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (11/11) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (11/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 8% (12/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Juan Pablo Ficovich Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Maxime Cressy
Player
Juan Pablo Ficovich
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve %
74%
(
42 of
57)
10
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
0
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
73%
(
11 of
15)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
13 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
25 of
57)
63
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Juan Pablo Ficovich
Player
Bernard Tomic
56%
(
32 of
57)
1st Serve %
53%
(
37 of
70)
6
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
1
91%
(
29 of
32)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
12 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
28 of
70)
73
Total Points Won
54
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Maxime Cressy
Player
Juan Pablo Ficovich
59%
(
36 of
61)
1st Serve %
56%
(
36 of
64)
14
Aces
3
9
Double Faults
4
94%
(
34 of
36)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
15 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
25 of
64)
71
Total Points Won
54
|
7-6(6) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Juan Pablo Ficovich
Player
Goncalo Oliveira
64%
(
45 of
70)
1st Serve %
61%
(
42 of
69)
10
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
7
78%
(
35 of
45)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
33 of
42)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
21 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
26 of
69)
75
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Thiago Agustin Tirante
Player
Juan Pablo Ficovich
56%
(
27 of
48)
1st Serve %
47%
(
33 of
70)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
22 of
33)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
15 of
37)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
33 of
70)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Juan Pablo Ficovich
Player
Elmar Ejupovic
54%
(
29 of
54)
1st Serve %
52%
(
36 of
69)
2
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
9
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
76%
(
19 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
20%
(
11 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
29 of
69)
72
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Denis Kudla
Player
Juan Pablo Ficovich
53%
(
25 of
47)
1st Serve %
46%
(
30 of
65)
5
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
4
88%
(
22 of
25)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
20 of
30)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
12 of
35)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
26%
(
12 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
33 of
65)
68
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Tristan Boyer
Player
Juan Pablo Ficovich
63%
(
44 of
70)
1st Serve %
66%
(
40 of
61)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
0
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
25 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
28 of
61)
73
Total Points Won
58
|
7-6(6) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Juan Pablo Ficovich
Player
Murkel Alejandro Dellien Velasco
61%
(
54 of
88)
1st Serve %
62%
(
61 of
98)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
36 of
61)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
43%
(
38 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
46 of
98)
96
Total Points Won
90
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Juan Pablo Ficovich
Player
Stefan Kozlov
60%
(
38 of
63)
1st Serve %
63%
(
37 of
59)
2
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
6
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
22 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
25 of
59)
66
Total Points Won
56
|
7-6(6) 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Julian Lenz Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Robin Haase
Player
Julian Lenz
61%
(
71 of
117)
1st Serve %
71%
(
79 of
111)
11
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
2
80%
(
57 of
71)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
58 of
79)
41%
(
19 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
35%
(
41 of
117)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
38 of
111)
114
Total Points Won
114
|
6-4 4-6 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Julian Lenz
Player
Evgeny Donskoy
67%
(
68 of
101)
1st Serve %
64%
(
69 of
107)
5
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
72%
(
49 of
68)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
49 of
69)
61%
(
20 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
32%
(
32 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
40 of
107)
109
Total Points Won
99
|
6-2 6-7(3) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Julian Lenz
Player
Dennis Novak
67%
(
68 of
102)
1st Serve %
65%
(
66 of
101)
11
Aces
10
2
Double Faults
3
69%
(
47 of
68)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
49 of
66)
65%
(
22 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
32%
(
33 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
39 of
101)
108
Total Points Won
95
|
4-6 6-1 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Julian Lenz
Player
Hazem Naow
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve %
70%
(
45 of
64)
5
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
20 of
45)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
18 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
37 of
64)
70
Total Points Won
45
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Julian Lenz
Player
Mikalai Haliak
62%
(
45 of
73)
1st Serve %
58%
(
51 of
88)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
32 of
51)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
13 of
37)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
40%
(
29 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
43 of
88)
87
Total Points Won
74
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nerman Fatic
Player
Julian Lenz
61%
(
36 of
59)
1st Serve %
66%
(
33 of
50)
19
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
86%
(
31 of
36)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
22 of
33)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
11 of
17)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
22%
(
13 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
17 of
50)
63
Total Points Won
46
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Julian Lenz
Player
Aldin Setkic
58%
(
39 of
67)
1st Serve %
54%
(
38 of
71)
14
Aces
10
3
Double Faults
6
87%
(
34 of
39)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
29 of
38)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
18 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
25 of
71)
74
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Julian Lenz
Player
Andrew Paulson
58%
(
69 of
120)
1st Serve %
62%
(
62 of
100)
12
Aces
13
7
Double Faults
5
78%
(
54 of
69)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
48 of
62)
59%
(
30 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
30%
(
36 of
120)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
30 of
100)
114
Total Points Won
106
|
6-7(6) 7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kai Wehnelt
Player
Julian Lenz
63%
(
60 of
96)
1st Serve %
63%
(
69 of
110)
2
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
8
77%
(
46 of
60)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
45 of
69)
28%
(
10 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
16 of
41)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
5 of
5)
42%
(
40 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
49 of
110)
105
Total Points Won
101
|
7-6(5) 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jurij Rodionov
Player
Julian Lenz
70%
(
47 of
67)
1st Serve %
66%
(
38 of
58)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
75%
(
15 of
20)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
36%
(
24 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
26 of
58)
69
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Ficovich Vs Lenz Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
