Juan Pablo Paz vs Alessandro Ceppellini Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Paz vs Ceppellini analysis and find out who is favored!
Juan Pablo Paz vs Alessandro Ceppellini Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Paz has won 48.36% of points on his second serve, while Ceppellini has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Paz, in recent form, has won 48.57% of his opponent's second serve points, while Ceppellini has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 34.43% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Paz has saved 50.75% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Ceppellini has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Paz has won 57.14% of matches played (W/L 44/ 33), with Ceppellini winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Paz has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 60% (W/L 437/ 297), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Ceppellini has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 49% (W/L 99/ 105), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 29% (W/L 2/ 5).
- Player level: In the last year, Paz has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 62.9% of matches (W/L 39/ 23), where as Ceppellini has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Paz winning 2 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Paz winning 4 and Ceppellini winning 0. The last match between Paz and Ceppellini was at the Italy F16 (Gaeta), 29-06-2018, Quarterfinals, Clay with Juan Pablo Paz getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:22:30.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Paz and Ceppellini have played a deciding set 0 times, with Paz winning 0 times and Ceppellini 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Paz winning 1, and Ceppellini 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Paz has played against opponents with an average rank of 313.88 while Ceppellini has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Paz has won 44% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Ceppellini has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Paz has converted 41.01% of breakpoint opportunities, and Ceppellini has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Paz 2 - 0 Ceppellini
7
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
7
Minor
558
Rank
284
High
29
Age
R
Plays
2
Total0
0
Hard0
2
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
873
High
27
Age
R
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
59% (446-315)
Career Total W/L
47% (103-114)
38% (5-8)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$2,105
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Paz VS Ceppellini H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
stats | Juan Pablo Paz | Alessandro Ceppellini |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 2 | 0 |
Sets Won | 4 | 0 |
Games Won | 25 | 11 |
Aces (Total) | 8 | 2 |
DFs (Total) | 2 | 7 |
Avg Match Time | 1:22:30 | 1:22:30 |
1st Serve % | 62% (58/93) | 49% (63/128) |
1st Serve Win% | 88% (51/58) | 76% (48/63) |
2nd Serve Win% | 71% (25/35) | 32% (21/65) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 38% (6/16) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Points W% | 46% (59/128) | 18% (17/93) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
Paz VS Ceppellini H2h Matches played
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
7-6(3) 6-1 |
Juan Pablo Paz
Player
Alessandro Ceppellini
70%
(
39 of
56)
1st Serve %
57%
(
39 of
68)
6
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
87%
(
34 of
39)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
30 of
39)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
8 of
29)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
12 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
30 of
68)
74
Total Points Won
50
|
||||
6-2 6-2 |
Juan Pablo Paz
Player
Alessandro Ceppellini
51%
(
19 of
37)
1st Serve %
40%
(
24 of
60)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
89%
(
17 of
19)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
18 of
24)
83%
(
15 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
13 of
36)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
5 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
60)
61
Total Points Won
36
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Juan Pablo Paz | Alessandro Ceppellini |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 38% (5/8) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 45% (13/16) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 49% (132/139) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 38% (5/8) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.19 | 0 |
Aces Total | 25 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0.23 | 0 |
DFs Total | 30 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1:47:6 | N/A |
Avg Opp Rank | 276.92 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 65% (542/836) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 64% (349/542) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 51% (151/294) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 42% (36/85) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 39% (348/882) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 38% (3/5) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 40% (2/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 33% (4/12) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 75% (3/4) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/4) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 63% (8/5) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 38% (8/3) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (5/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Juan Pablo Paz Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 |
Louis Wessels
Player
Juan Pablo Paz
63%
(
71 of
112)
1st Serve %
57%
(
37 of
65)
5
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
7
66%
(
47 of
71)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
37%
(
15 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
15%
(
3 of
20)
45%
(
50 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
65)
91
Total Points Won
86
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Nick Hardt
Player
Juan Pablo Paz
72%
(
51 of
71)
1st Serve %
65%
(
61 of
94)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
78%
(
40 of
51)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
41 of
61)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
27%
(
19 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
36 of
94)
88
Total Points Won
77
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Juan Pablo Paz
Player
Boris Kozlov
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve %
58%
(
43 of
74)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
6
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
14 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
38 of
74)
69
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Mohamed Safwat
Player
Juan Pablo Paz
50%
(
30 of
60)
1st Serve %
67%
(
50 of
75)
3
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
36 of
50)
70%
(
21 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
14 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
29 of
75)
75
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Juan Pablo Paz
Player
Yshai Oliel
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve %
73%
(
41 of
56)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
56)
60
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Kamil Majchrzak
Player
Juan Pablo Paz
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve %
70%
(
26 of
37)
7
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
54
Total Points Won
32
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Juan Pablo Paz
Player
Mohamed Safwat
71%
(
47 of
66)
1st Serve %
56%
(
32 of
57)
4
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
2
79%
(
37 of
47)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
22 of
32)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
68%
(
17 of
25)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
17 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
18 of
57)
67
Total Points Won
56
|
7-6(9) 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Maxime Chazal
Player
Juan Pablo Paz
62%
(
37 of
60)
1st Serve %
68%
(
40 of
59)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
0
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
35%
(
8 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
40%
(
24 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
65
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Juan Pablo Paz
Player
Antonio Caruso
67%
(
10 of
15)
1st Serve %
58%
(
11 of
19)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
90%
(
9 of
10)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
7 of
11)
60%
(
3 of
5)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
3 of
15)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
11 of
18)
23
Total Points Won
10
|
5-1 ret. | H2H | ||
R2 |
Hady Habib
Player
Juan Pablo Paz
64%
(
54 of
85)
1st Serve %
60%
(
55 of
92)
11
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
76%
(
41 of
54)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
33%
(
28 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
42 of
92)
99
Total Points Won
78
|
6-7(4) 6-2 6-2 | H2H |
view more
Alessandro Ceppellini Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Leopold Zima
Player
Alessandro Ceppellini
64%
(
45 of
70)
1st Serve %
73%
(
79 of
108)
6
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
5
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
38 of
79)
28%
(
7 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
47%
(
8 of
17)
Break Points Won
83%
(
5 of
6)
46%
(
32 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
57 of
108)
95
Total Points Won
83
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Emilien Voisin
Player
Alessandro Ceppellini
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve %
64%
(
27 of
42)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
33%
(
16 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
56
Total Points Won
34
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
Alessandro Ceppellini
Player
Ivan Karlo Ban
69%
(
48 of
70)
1st Serve %
51%
(
36 of
71)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
37%
(
26 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
34 of
71)
78
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 2-6 7-5 10-5 | H2H | |||
QF |
Yannik Steinegger
Player
Alessandro Ceppellini
56%
(
45 of
80)
1st Serve %
55%
(
36 of
65)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
43%
(
15 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
46%
(
37 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
30 of
65)
73
Total Points Won
72
|
6-4 4-6 10-6 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Alessandro Ceppellini
Player
Mark Mitchell
56%
(
29 of
52)
1st Serve %
64%
(
34 of
53)
5
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
4
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
70%
(
16 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
29%
(
15 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
24 of
53)
61
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-2 6-7(2) 10-4 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 4-6 6-1 10-8 | H2H |
view more