Juan Pablo Paz vs Daniel Michalski Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Paz vs Michalski analysis and find out who is favored!
Juan Pablo Paz vs Daniel Michalski Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Paz has won 48.28% of points on his second serve, while Michalski has won 50.5%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Paz, in recent form, has won 50.31% of his opponent's second serve points, while Michalski has won 52.53%. The same stats for first serve returns are 33.68% and 35.29% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Paz has saved 52.43% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Michalski has saved 57.01% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Paz has won 54.41% of matches played (W/L 37/ 31), with Michalski winning 57.81% (W/L 37/ 27) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Paz has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 59% (W/L 439/ 299), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Michalski has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 66% (W/L 180/ 93), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 45% (W/L 5/ 6).
- Player level: In the last year, Paz has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 61.54% of matches (W/L 32/ 20), where as Michalski has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 42.86% of matches (W/L 15/ 20). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Paz winning 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Paz winning 0 and Michalski winning 2. The last match between Paz and Michalski was at the M15 Antalya, 23-10-2021, Semifinals, Clay with Daniel Michalski getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:34:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Paz and Michalski have played a deciding set 0 times, with Paz winning 0 times and Michalski 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Paz winning 0, and Michalski 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Paz has played against opponents with an average rank of 317.76 while Michalski has played against players with an average rank of 237.75.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Paz has won 41% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Michalski has won 42% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Paz has converted 41.71% of breakpoint opportunities, and Michalski has converted 44.55% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Paz 0 - 1 Michalski
7
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
7
Minor
587
Rank
284
High
29
Age
R
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard0
0
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
335
Rank
243
High
24
Age
R
Plays
11
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
11
Minor
Form
59% (448-317)
Career Total W/L
62% (213-129)
41% (7-10)
YTD W/L
52% (13-12)
$2,105
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Juan Pablo Paz | Daniel Michalski |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
Sets Won | 0 | 2 |
Games Won | 5 | 12 |
Aces (Total) | 2 | 1 |
DFs (Total) | 2 | 2 |
Avg Match Time | 1:34:0 | 1:34:0 |
1st Serve % | 59% (30/51) | 57% (32/56) |
1st Serve Win% | 53% (16/30) | 63% (20/32) |
2nd Serve Win% | 38% (8/21) | 58% (14/24) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 40% (2/5) | 56% (5/9) |
Return Points W% | 39% (22/56) | 53% (27/51) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-3 6-2 |
Daniel Michalski
Player
Juan Pablo Paz
57%
(
32 of
56)
1st Serve %
59%
(
30 of
51)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
63%
(
20 of
32)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
22 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
61
Total Points Won
46
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Juan Pablo Paz | Daniel Michalski |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 41% (7/10) | 52% (13/12) |
Sets Win/Loss | 47% (18/20) | 52% (29/27) |
Games Win/Loss | 49% (176/183) | 50% (268/272) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 14% (1/6) |
Clay Win/Loss | 41% (7/10) | 67% (10/5) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 67% (2/1) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.21 | 0.14 |
Aces Total | 37 | 36 |
DFs per game | 0.26 | 0.2 |
DFs Total | 46 | 52 |
Avg Match Time | 1:48:42 | 1:54:48 |
Avg Opp Rank | 251.29 | 317.72 |
1st Serve % | 64% (707/1110) | 62% (1104/1793) |
1st Serve W% | 65% (457/707) | 63% (700/1104) |
2nd Serve W% | 49% (199/403) | 52% (355/689) |
BPs Won% Total | 43% (49/113) | 45% (74/164) |
Return Pts W% | 40% (466/1164) | 41% (713/1752) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 33% (3/6) | 44% (8/10) |
Futures W/L | 50% (4/4) | 71% (5/2) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 38% (6/16) | 52% (13/25) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 80% (4/5) | 70% (7/10) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/5) | 50% (3/6) |
1st set W, W | 64% (11/7) | 93% (14/13) |
1st set W, L | 36% (11/4) | 7% (14/1) |
1st set L, W | 0% (6/0) | 0% (11/0) |
Juan Pablo Paz Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF |
Facundo Juarez
Player
Juan Pablo Paz
62%
(
37 of
60)
1st Serve %
52%
(
31 of
60)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
4
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
42%
(
25 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
60)
64
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Juan Pablo Paz
Player
Petr Brunclik
66%
(
43 of
65)
1st Serve %
74%
(
49 of
66)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
32 of
49)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
29%
(
19 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
25 of
66)
71
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Juan Pablo Paz
Player
Biagio Gramaticopolo
68%
(
46 of
68)
1st Serve %
64%
(
48 of
75)
5
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
37%
(
25 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
75)
78
Total Points Won
65
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Roberto Cid Subervi
Player
Juan Pablo Paz
60%
(
49 of
81)
1st Serve %
56%
(
45 of
81)
2
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
8
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
11 of
36)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
41%
(
33 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
45 of
81)
93
Total Points Won
69
|
4-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Louis Wessels
Player
Juan Pablo Paz
63%
(
71 of
112)
1st Serve %
57%
(
37 of
65)
5
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
7
66%
(
47 of
71)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
37%
(
15 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
15%
(
3 of
20)
45%
(
50 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
65)
91
Total Points Won
86
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Nick Hardt
Player
Juan Pablo Paz
72%
(
51 of
71)
1st Serve %
65%
(
61 of
94)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
78%
(
40 of
51)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
41 of
61)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
27%
(
19 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
36 of
94)
88
Total Points Won
77
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Juan Pablo Paz
Player
Boris Kozlov
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve %
58%
(
43 of
74)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
6
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
14 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
38 of
74)
69
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Mohamed Safwat
Player
Juan Pablo Paz
50%
(
30 of
60)
1st Serve %
67%
(
50 of
75)
3
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
36 of
50)
70%
(
21 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
14 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
29 of
75)
75
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Juan Pablo Paz
Player
Yshai Oliel
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve %
73%
(
41 of
56)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
56)
60
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Kamil Majchrzak
Player
Juan Pablo Paz
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve %
70%
(
26 of
37)
7
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
54
Total Points Won
32
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H |
view more
Daniel Michalski Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF |
David Pichler
Player
Daniel Michalski
68%
(
55 of
81)
1st Serve %
51%
(
25 of
49)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
64%
(
35 of
55)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
17 of
25)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
38%
(
31 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
73
Total Points Won
57
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Daniel Michalski
Player
Branko Djuric
48%
(
31 of
64)
1st Serve %
56%
(
37 of
66)
1
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
2
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
73%
(
24 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
28%
(
18 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
28 of
66)
74
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
QF |
Marcello Serafini
Player
Daniel Michalski
64%
(
54 of
84)
1st Serve %
73%
(
63 of
86)
0
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
37 of
63)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
43%
(
36 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
37 of
86)
85
Total Points Won
85
|
6-3 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Daniel Michalski
Player
Luigi Sorrentino
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve %
52%
(
25 of
48)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
6
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
32%
(
14 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
57
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Daniel Michalski
Player
Dax Donders
50%
(
31 of
62)
1st Serve %
56%
(
28 of
50)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
65%
(
20 of
31)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
71%
(
22 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
32%
(
20 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
23 of
50)
65
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
SF |
Tommaso Compagnucci
Player
Daniel Michalski
61%
(
52 of
85)
1st Serve %
52%
(
48 of
92)
0
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
5
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
33 of
48)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
44%
(
37 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
38 of
92)
86
Total Points Won
91
|
6-4 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Daniel Michalski
Player
Michele Ribecai
61%
(
43 of
71)
1st Serve %
64%
(
47 of
73)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
39%
(
28 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
73)
77
Total Points Won
67
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
R2 |
Daniel Michalski
Player
Luca Parenti
49%
(
27 of
55)
1st Serve %
59%
(
32 of
54)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
75%
(
21 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
25%
(
14 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
22 of
54)
63
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Daniel Michalski
Player
Pietro Marino
57%
(
65 of
115)
1st Serve %
56%
(
68 of
121)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
58%
(
38 of
65)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
39 of
68)
44%
(
22 of
50)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
24 of
53)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
57%
(
8 of
14)
48%
(
55 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
58 of
121)
118
Total Points Won
118
|
7-6(4) 3-6 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Zsombor Piros
Player
Daniel Michalski
56%
(
37 of
66)
1st Serve %
59%
(
44 of
75)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
66%
(
19 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
22 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
75)
78
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(0) 6-2 | H2H |
view more