Julia Grabher vs Hanne Vandewinkel Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan
Published on 01 Sep at 01:03 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
J. Grabher vs H. Vandewinkel

AUT
3
Win
Played
0
Win

BEL
3
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Grabher 3 - 0 Vandewinkel
They have played 6 sets in total, with Julia Grabher winning 6 and Hanne Vandewinkel winning 0. The last match between Julia Grabher and Hanne Vandewinkel was at the Montreux Nestle Open - Montreux, 01-09-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Julia Grabher getting the victory 6-2 7-5.
Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Grabher | 3 |
Vandewinkel | 0 |
Last H2H Matches:
(R1) Montreux Nestle Open - Montreux(09-01-25)
(SF) W75 Hechingen(08-02-25)
(QF) W35 Santa Margherita di Pula(09-27-24)
J. Grabher vs H. Vandewinkel H2H Profile
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
$402,254 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
60.29% (413-272) | Career Total W/L | 67.30% (177-86) |
3 | Clay | 0 |
17 | Titles | 9 |
3 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
21.43% (3-11) | YTD Win/Loss | 100.00% (1-0) |
J. Grabher vs H. Vandewinkel Match Preview:
- Second Serve Performance: Vandewinkel has a slight edge with a recent second serve win rate of 38.62%, compared to Grabher's 38.58%.
- Return Game Stats: Vandewinkel excels in recent form by winning 54.11% of opponent's second serve points, while Grabher stands at 47.53%. Could this be a decisive factor? Yes, especially since return performance is crucial in tennis outcomes.
- First Serve Returns: Both players are closely matched, with Vandewinkel at 33.1% and Grabher at 32.37%.
- Under Pressure: Vandewinkel has outperformed in saving breakpoints, registering 52.21% against Grabher's 43.99%.
- Overall Performance: In the past year, both players show high win rates; Vandewinkel at 64.47% and Grabher slightly higher at 65.93%.
- Surface Preferences: Vandewinkel shines on Hard courts with a 73% win rate, while Grabher performs best on Clay with 65% wins.
- Competition Level: Grabher has shown superior success in higher tier tournaments with a 77.03% win rate, compared to Vandewinkel’s 68.18% in similar events.
- Direct Head-to-Head: Grabher holds a significant advantage with 2 wins in 2 matches against Vandewinkel, winning all 4 sets played.
- Deciding Set Record: Vandewinkel has a 71% win rate in deciding sets, compared to Grabher’s 48% over the last year.
- Break Point Conversion: Vandewinkel leads here with a 40.47% conversion, surpassing Grabher's 35.97%.
- Opponent Quality: Grabher has faced stronger opponents on average, with a ranking differential (271.67 vs. 290.09 for Vandewinkel).
Editorial Prediction (September 1, 2025, UTC):
Analyzing the recent form and historical data reveals intriguing insights about Vandewinkel and Grabher's upcoming match. Vandewinkel shows a slight advantage in several aspects, notably second serve performance and breakpoint opportunities.
However, Grabher's superior history in their direct head-to-head encounters and better performance in higher-level competitions cannot be ignored. Additionally, Grabher's ability to perform against tougher-ranked opponents adds to her strength.
Considering all factors, while Vandewinkel has areas of strength, Grabher is most likely to secure a victory in this upcoming match, given her consistent dominance in their previous head-to-head matchups and stronger competitive background.
Julia Grabher vs Hanne Vandewinkel Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
J. Grabher vs H. Vandewinkel H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
3 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
6 | Sets Won | 0 |
37 | Games Won | 15 |
6 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
7 | Total Double Faults | 17 |
1:25:6 | Average Match Time | 1:25:6 |
66% (103/156) | 1st Serve % | 65% (119/184) |
72% (74/103) | 1st Serve Win % | 52% (62/119) |
55% (29/53) | 2nd Serve Win % | 37% (24/65) |
47% (15/32) | Break Pts Won % | 38% (5/13) |
53% (98/184) | Return Points Win % | 34% (53/156) |
100% (3/3) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/3) |
100% (3/3) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/3) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/3) |
Recent Performance Stats
J. Grabher Recent Matches Played
H. Vandewinkel Recent Matches Played

J. Grabher vs H. Vandewinkel Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
60.29% (413/272) | YTD Win/Loss | 67.30% (177/86) |
58.84% (912/638) | Sets Win/Loss | 63.08% (381/223) |
54.07% (7560/6422) | Games Win/Loss | 55.48% (3083/2474) |
44.78% (30/37) | Hard Win/Loss | 72.53% (66/25) |
65.17% (363/194) | Clay Win/Loss | 64.14% (93/52) |
34.55% (19/36) | Indoor Hard W/L | 69.23% (18/8) |
16.67% (1/5) | Grass Win/Loss | 0.00% (0/1) |
0.11 | Aces Per Game | 0.13 |
731 | Aces Total | 364 |
0.38 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.4 |
2559 | Total Double Faults | 1087 |
1:22:2 | Average Match Time | 1:48:3 |
474.82 | Average Opponent Rank | 436.68 |
65% (24959/38561) | 1st Serve % | 67% (11346/16986) |
62% (15552/24959) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (7034/11346) |
45% (6072/13600) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (2535/5640) |
49% (2488/5084) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 48% (1182/2445) |
47% (18348/39121) | Return Points Win % | 48% (8409/17531) |
34.48% (10/19) | Slam W/L | 33.33% (2/4) |
47.06% (8/9) | Masters W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
31.82% (7/15) | Cups W/L | 40.00% (2/3) |
33.90% (20/39) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
63.40% (272/157) | Challenger W/L | 66.67% (128/64) |
74.42% (96/33) | Futures W/L | 76.27% (45/14) |
60% (406/672) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 68% (177/262) |
33% (1/3) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
49% (64/131) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 51% (27/53) |
53% (99/187) | Deciding Set Win % | 67% (52/78) |
90% (401/360) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 93% (160/148) |
10% (401/40) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 7% (160/11) |
19% (284/55) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 28% (103/29) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips

Prediction Of Buyunchaokete Vs Zhizhen H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?

Prediction Of Basavareddy Vs Cilic H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?

Prediction Of Berrettini Vs Svrcina H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?
