Julian Lenz vs Isaiah Strode Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Lenz vs Strode analysis and find out who is favored!
Julian Lenz vs Isaiah Strode Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Lenz has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Strode has won 47.37%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Lenz, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Strode has won 53.52%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 27.17% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Lenz has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Strode has saved 56.25% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Lenz has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Strode winning 44.83% (W/L 13/ 16) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Lenz has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 121/ 95), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 33% (W/L 1/ 2). Strode has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 55% (W/L 67/ 54), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 20% (W/L 1/ 4).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Lenz winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Lenz winning 2 and Strode winning 0. The last match between Lenz and Strode was at the M25 Bakersfield, 17-03-2022, Second, Hard with Julian Lenz getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:30:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Lenz and Strode have played a deciding set 0 times, with Lenz winning 0 times and Strode 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Lenz winning 0, and Strode 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Lenz has played against opponents with an average rank of while Strode has played against players with an average rank of 103.86.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Lenz has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Strode has won 42% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Lenz has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Strode has converted 30.56% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Lenz 1 - 0 Strode
3
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
3
Minor
864
Rank
227
High
31
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
872
Rank
725
High
26
Age
R
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
55% (207-169)
Career Total W/L
54% (180-154)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
50% (3-3)
$25,665
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Julian Lenz | Isaiah Strode |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 13 | 8 |
Aces (Total) | 5 | 2 |
DFs (Total) | 4 | 7 |
Avg Match Time | 1:30:0 | 1:30:0 |
1st Serve % | 70% (45/64) | 55% (36/65) |
1st Serve Win% | 71% (32/45) | 67% (24/36) |
2nd Serve Win% | 47% (9/19) | 34% (10/29) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 45% (5/11) | 100% (2/2) |
Return Points W% | 48% (31/65) | 36% (23/64) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
7-5 6-3 |
Julian Lenz
Player
Isaiah Strode
70%
(
45 of
64)
1st Serve %
55%
(
36 of
65)
5
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
7
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
36%
(
23 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
65)
72
Total Points Won
57
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Julian Lenz | Isaiah Strode |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (3/3) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 57% (8/6) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 54% (69/59) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 50% (3/3) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0.17 |
Aces Total | 0 | 11 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0.29 |
DFs Total | 0 | 18 |
Avg Match Time | N/A | 1:16:39 |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 123.83 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 63% (193/307) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 76% (147/193) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 47% (54/114) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 31% (11/36) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 39% (126/326) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 60% (3/2) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 50% (3/6) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/2) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 60% (5/3) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 40% (5/2) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Julian Lenz Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF |
Robin Haase
Player
Julian Lenz
61%
(
71 of
117)
1st Serve %
71%
(
79 of
111)
11
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
2
80%
(
57 of
71)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
58 of
79)
41%
(
19 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
35%
(
41 of
117)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
38 of
111)
114
Total Points Won
114
|
6-4 4-6 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
R2 |
Julian Lenz
Player
Evgeny Donskoy
67%
(
68 of
101)
1st Serve %
64%
(
69 of
107)
5
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
72%
(
49 of
68)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
49 of
69)
61%
(
20 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
32%
(
32 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
40 of
107)
109
Total Points Won
99
|
6-2 6-7(3) 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Julian Lenz
Player
Dennis Novak
67%
(
68 of
102)
1st Serve %
65%
(
66 of
101)
11
Aces
10
2
Double Faults
3
69%
(
47 of
68)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
49 of
66)
65%
(
22 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
32%
(
33 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
39 of
101)
108
Total Points Won
95
|
4-6 6-1 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
QF |
Julian Lenz
Player
Hazem Naow
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve %
70%
(
45 of
64)
5
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
20 of
45)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
18 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
37 of
64)
70
Total Points Won
45
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Julian Lenz
Player
Mikalai Haliak
62%
(
45 of
73)
1st Serve %
58%
(
51 of
88)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
32 of
51)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
13 of
37)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
40%
(
29 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
43 of
88)
87
Total Points Won
74
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Nerman Fatic
Player
Julian Lenz
61%
(
36 of
59)
1st Serve %
66%
(
33 of
50)
19
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
86%
(
31 of
36)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
22 of
33)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
11 of
17)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
22%
(
13 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
17 of
50)
63
Total Points Won
46
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Julian Lenz
Player
Aldin Setkic
58%
(
39 of
67)
1st Serve %
54%
(
38 of
71)
14
Aces
10
3
Double Faults
6
87%
(
34 of
39)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
29 of
38)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
18 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
25 of
71)
74
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Julian Lenz
Player
Andrew Paulson
58%
(
69 of
120)
1st Serve %
62%
(
62 of
100)
12
Aces
13
7
Double Faults
5
78%
(
54 of
69)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
48 of
62)
59%
(
30 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
30%
(
36 of
120)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
30 of
100)
114
Total Points Won
106
|
6-7(6) 7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Kai Wehnelt
Player
Julian Lenz
63%
(
60 of
96)
1st Serve %
63%
(
69 of
110)
2
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
8
77%
(
46 of
60)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
45 of
69)
28%
(
10 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
16 of
41)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
5 of
5)
42%
(
40 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
49 of
110)
105
Total Points Won
101
|
7-6(5) 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Jurij Rodionov
Player
Julian Lenz
70%
(
47 of
67)
1st Serve %
66%
(
38 of
58)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
75%
(
15 of
20)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
36%
(
24 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
26 of
58)
69
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H |
view more
Isaiah Strode Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
R2 |
Cash Hanzlik
Player
Isaiah Strode
58%
(
67 of
115)
1st Serve %
56%
(
52 of
93)
10
Aces
3
7
Double Faults
6
76%
(
51 of
67)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
41 of
52)
50%
(
24 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
35%
(
40 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
32 of
93)
107
Total Points Won
101
|
4-6 6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Isaiah Strode
Player
Matthew Summers
72%
(
43 of
60)
1st Serve %
58%
(
29 of
50)
0
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
0
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
19 of
29)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
18 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
22 of
50)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Isaiah Strode
Player
Santino Morel Rieder
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve %
52%
(
33 of
63)
2
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
5
89%
(
25 of
28)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
6 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
32 of
63)
64
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 |
Ezekiel Clark
Player
Isaiah Strode
56%
(
55 of
98)
1st Serve %
60%
(
70 of
116)
8
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
5
78%
(
43 of
55)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
48 of
70)
53%
(
23 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
18 of
46)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
33%
(
32 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
50 of
116)
116
Total Points Won
98
|
6-7(5) 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Gage Brymer
Player
Isaiah Strode
71%
(
75 of
105)
1st Serve %
55%
(
71 of
128)
7
Aces
16
3
Double Faults
10
67%
(
50 of
75)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
50 of
71)
67%
(
20 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
23 of
57)
24%
(
4 of
17)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
33%
(
35 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
55 of
128)
125
Total Points Won
108
|
4-6 7-6(12) 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Philip Sekulic
Player
Isaiah Strode
59%
(
24 of
41)
1st Serve %
46%
(
18 of
39)
7
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
96%
(
23 of
24)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
14 of
18)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
8 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
52
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
SF |
Learner Tien
Player
Isaiah Strode
57%
(
42 of
74)
1st Serve %
59%
(
41 of
70)
9
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
1
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
39%
(
29 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
31 of
70)
76
Total Points Won
68
|
6-3 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
QF |
Isaiah Strode
Player
Warren Wood
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve %
58%
(
30 of
52)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
25 of
52)
59
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H |
view more