Julie Belgraver vs Carlota Martinez Cirez Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

According to recent statistics, Cirez has achieved a remarkable 46.98% success rate in winning points on their second serve within the last six months. On the other hand, Belgraver has secured 42.38% of points on their second serve during the same timeframe. This particular statistic holds substantial significance when it comes to predicting the outcome of matches.

Analysis of return game statistics also sheds light on the performance of Cirez and Belgraver. In recent form, Cirez has won an impressive 59.47% of their opponents' second serve points, while Belgraver has managed to secure 53.8%. Furthermore, the numbers for first serve returns stand at 47.84% and 39.67% respectively. These statistics play a crucial role in determining the favorite in this highly anticipated head-to-head match-up.

Examining how players handle pressure situations is also crucial. Cirez has proven to be adept at saving 51.84% of breakpoints in recent matches, whereas Belgraver has an equally commendable record of saving 53.82%. This statistic is valuable for making predictions during in-game betting.

Looking back over the span of a year, Cirez boasts an impressive overall win rate of 63.64% in the matches they have played (winning 56 out of 88). Meanwhile, Belgraver's win rate stands at 60.94% (winning 39 out of 64). These figures provide a comprehensive overview of the head-to-head prediction.

Considering surface statistics, Cirez has excelled on clay courts, winning an impressive 63% of matches (203 out of 324). Conversely, their performance on indoor hard courts has been less remarkable, with only a 33% win rate (1 out of 3). Belgraver, on the other hand, has achieved their highest career win rate on hard courts, winning 63% of matches (69 out of 109). However, their performance on clay courts has been slightly inferior, with a win rate of 49% (43 out of 88).

An examination of player level reveals that in the past year, Cirez has primarily competed in Challengers/ITF tournaments with a prize money greater than $10,000. During this period, they have achieved a commendable 63.95% win rate (55 out of 86). Similarly, Belgraver has mostly played in Challengers/ITF tournaments with the same prize money range, boasting a 60% win rate (30 out of 50). When predicting the favorite, it is important to consider the level of competition each player has been exposed to.

When it comes to opponent quality, Cirez has faced players with an average ranking of 442.08 over the past year. In contrast, Belgraver has encountered opponents with an average ranking of 415.69.

In matches that go into a deciding set, Cirez has shown an impressive record of winning 57% of such sets in the past 12 months. On the other hand, Belgraver has demonstrated an even higher success rate, winning 78% of deciding sets in all matches played on the professional tour.

While historical player performance provides valuable insights for predicting the outcome of a tennis match, it is equally important to consider their current performance in the ongoing event. To assess the form of the players, it is essential to refer to the statistics from the current event (if they have already played a match). Additionally, it should be noted that certain players tend to excel in specific events, and these factors must be taken into account when making predictions.

Breakpoint conversion is another crucial aspect to consider. Cirez has successfully converted 52.67% of breakpoint opportunities, while Belgraver has achieved a conversion rate of 50.7% in breaking their opponents' serves. This statistic proves to be highly informative for in-game live betting tips when either player is presented with a breakpoint opportunity.

For those interested in models that predict tennis matches, the following article serves as an excellent starting point. However, it should be noted that its content is more suitable for statistics enthusiasts.