Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Jumpei Yamasaki vs Martin Damm Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Yamasaki vs analysis and find out who is favored!
Jumpei Yamasaki vs Martin Damm Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Yamasaki has won 51.09% of points on his second serve, while has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Yamasaki, in recent form, has won 54.56% of his opponent's second serve points, while has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 35.81% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Yamasaki has saved 55.81% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Yamasaki has won 55.81% of matches played (W/L 24/ 19), with winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Yamasaki has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 58% (W/L 188/ 135), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 53% (W/L 9/ 8). has their best career surface win % on , winning % (W/L / ), and worse career win % on , winning % (W/L / ).
- Player level: In the last year, Yamasaki has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 55.81% of matches (W/L 24/ 19), where as has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Yamasaki has played against opponents with an average rank of 88.7 while has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Yamasaki has won 56% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Yamasaki has converted 49.25% of breakpoint opportunities, and has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Yamasaki 0 - 0
N/A
Rank
High
26
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
20
Age
Plays
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
Form
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
L
Career Total W/L
YTD W/L
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
YTD Titles
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Yamasaki VS H2h Matches played
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Jumpei Yamasaki | Martin Damm |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 57% (8/6) | 1st Match |
| Sets Win/Loss | 56% (18/14) | 1st Match |
| Games Win/Loss | 55% (178/145) | 1st Match |
| Hard Win/Loss | 57% (8/6) | 1st Match |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Aces pg | 0.22 | 1st Match |
| Aces Total | 35 | 1st Match |
| DFs per game | 0.05 | 1st Match |
| DFs Total | 8 | 1st Match |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 41.14 | 1st Match |
| 1st Serve % | 67% (333/495) | 1st Match |
| 1st Serve W% | 68% (225/333) | 1st Match |
| 2nd Serve W% | 49% (80/162) | 1st Match |
| BPs Won% Total | 44% (20/45) | 1st Match |
| Return Pts W% | 40% (197/491) | 1st Match |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Futures W/L | 57% (8/6) | 1st Match |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 57% (8/14) | 1st Match |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 33% (1/3) | 1st Match |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (2/4) | 1st Match |
| 1st set W, W | 89% (9/8) | 1st Match |
| 1st set W, L | 11% (9/1) | 1st Match |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (5/0) | 1st Match |
Jumpei Yamasaki Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats 
Hayato Matsuoka
Player
Jumpei Yamasaki
68%
(
49 of
72)
1st Serve %
69%
(
59 of
85)
0
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
0
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
34 of
59)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
39%
(
28 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
40 of
85)
84
Total Points Won
73
|
3-6 6-3 10-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 7-5 6-0 | H2H | |||
| QF | 7-5 7-6(4) | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
| QF | 7-5 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 7-5 4-6 10-8 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Nam Hoang Ly
Player
Jumpei Yamasaki
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve %
64%
(
43 of
67)
5
Aces
9
-
Double Faults
-
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
17 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
67)
67
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jumpei Yamasaki
Player
Leo Vithoontien
73%
(
65 of
89)
1st Serve %
63%
(
70 of
111)
7
Aces
8
0
Double Faults
5
71%
(
46 of
65)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
44 of
70)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
17 of
41)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
29 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
50 of
111)
110
Total Points Won
90
|
7-5 6-7(5) 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Martin Damm Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Martin Damm
60%
(
44 of
73)
1st Serve %
60%
(
50 of
83)
8
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
6
82%
(
36 of
44)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
33 of
50)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
15%
(
2 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
22 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
34 of
83)
85
Total Points Won
71
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Martin Damm
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve %
46%
(
31 of
68)
1
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
7
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
10 of
37)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
11 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
36 of
68)
67
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Martin Damm
Player
Toby Alex Kodat
51%
(
55 of
107)
1st Serve %
61%
(
57 of
94)
17
Aces
7
9
Double Faults
3
78%
(
43 of
55)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
39 of
57)
52%
(
27 of
52)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
35%
(
37 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
39 of
94)
109
Total Points Won
92
|
6-7(1) 7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Brandon Holt
Player
Martin Damm
63%
(
64 of
102)
1st Serve %
59%
(
54 of
91)
9
Aces
13
0
Double Faults
7
70%
(
45 of
64)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
39 of
54)
45%
(
17 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
39%
(
40 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
36 of
91)
98
Total Points Won
95
|
7-5 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Christopher O'Connell
Player
Martin Damm
65%
(
59 of
91)
1st Serve %
66%
(
49 of
74)
13
Aces
18
1
Double Faults
1
81%
(
48 of
59)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
40 of
49)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
30%
(
27 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
21 of
74)
85
Total Points Won
80
|
7-6(5) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Martin Damm
Player
Tommy Paul
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve %
59%
(
26 of
44)
10
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
17 of
26)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
12 of
18)
0%
(
0 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
14 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
15 of
44)
43
Total Points Won
43
|
4-6 2-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Martin Damm
Player
Zhizhen Zhang
60%
(
50 of
83)
1st Serve %
72%
(
63 of
87)
14
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
4
76%
(
38 of
50)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
43 of
63)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
33%
(
27 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
32 of
87)
88
Total Points Won
82
|
7-6(2) 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Bu Yunchaokete
Player
Martin Damm
71%
(
58 of
82)
1st Serve %
56%
(
50 of
90)
13
Aces
13
0
Double Faults
3
79%
(
46 of
58)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
38 of
50)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
8%
(
1 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
23 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
33 of
90)
92
Total Points Won
80
|
7-6(7) 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Martin Damm
Player
Filip Misolic
56%
(
48 of
85)
1st Serve %
58%
(
45 of
77)
13
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
4
83%
(
40 of
48)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
36 of
45)
65%
(
24 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
25%
(
21 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
22 of
77)
86
Total Points Won
76
|
4-6 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Martin Damm
Player
Riccardo Bonadio
63%
(
50 of
80)
1st Serve %
62%
(
49 of
79)
15
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
1
90%
(
45 of
50)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
36 of
49)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
70%
(
21 of
30)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
22 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
22 of
79)
80
Total Points Won
79
|
7-6(5) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
view more
Yamasaki Vs Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
