Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Juncheng Shang vs Matthew William Donald Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Shang vs Donald analysis and find out who is favored!
Juncheng Shang vs Matthew William Donald Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Shang has won 53.35% of points on his second serve, while Donald has won 35.82%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Shang, in recent form, has won 47.3% of his opponent's second serve points, while Donald has won 57.53%. The same stats for first serve returns are 31.85% and 40.09% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Shang has saved 63.35% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Donald has saved 51.48% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Shang has won 61.02% of matches played (W/L 36/ 23), with Donald winning 60.56% (W/L 43/ 28) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Shang has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 66% (W/L 33/ 17), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 50% (W/L 7/ 7). Donald has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 52% (W/L 25/ 23), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 33% (W/L 4/ 8).
- Player level: In the last year, Shang has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 60.87% of matches (W/L 14/ 9), where as Donald has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 60.56% of matches (W/L 43/ 28). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Shang has played against opponents with an average rank of 220.31 while Donald has played against players with an average rank of 138.9.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Shang has won 52% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Donald has won 55% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Shang has converted 33.33% of breakpoint opportunities, and Donald has converted 47.33% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Shang 0 - 0 Donald
111
Rank
111
High
19
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
808
Rank
807
High
19
Age
Plays
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
Form
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
L
W
L
63% (99-59)
Career Total W/L
47% (52-59)
63% (12-7)
YTD W/L
62% (13-8)
$648,525
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Juncheng Shang | Matthew William Donald |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 63% (12/7) | 62% (13/8) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 57% (29/22) | 61% (28/18) |
| Games Win/Loss | 51% (252/243) | 55% (234/191) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 64% (9/5) | 61% (11/7) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 60% (3/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 67% (2/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.25 | 0.08 |
| Aces Total | 61 | 17 |
| DFs per game | 0.17 | 0.47 |
| DFs Total | 42 | 98 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:7:19 | 1:24:48 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 108.63 | 81.57 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (963/1574) | 65% (667/1022) |
| 1st Serve W% | 69% (664/963) | 63% (417/667) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 54% (331/611) | 39% (137/355) |
| BPs Won% Total | 33% (52/158) | 48% (66/138) |
| Return Pts W% | 37% (582/1559) | 47% (530/1138) |
| Slam W/L | 67% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 67% (4/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 63% (5/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 62% (13/8) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 63% (10/16) | 62% (13/21) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 67% (2/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 75% (6/8) | 0% (0/3) |
| Deciding Set W% | 63% (5/8) | 50% (2/4) |
| 1st set W, W | 80% (10/8) | 92% (13/12) |
| 1st set W, L | 20% (10/2) | 8% (13/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 44% (9/4) | 13% (8/1) |
Juncheng Shang Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Tomas Machac
Player
Juncheng Shang
67%
(
41 of
61)
1st Serve %
58%
(
33 of
57)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
15 of
24)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
21 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
21 of
57)
61
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Juncheng Shang
Player
Hugo Grenier
66%
(
43 of
65)
1st Serve %
63%
(
35 of
56)
3
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
4
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
26 of
35)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
31%
(
20 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
20 of
56)
65
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Juncheng Shang
Player
Abedallah Shelbayh
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve %
62%
(
26 of
42)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
29%
(
15 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
58
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Marc-Andrea Huesler
Player
Juncheng Shang
77%
(
68 of
88)
1st Serve %
68%
(
62 of
91)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
68%
(
46 of
68)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
43 of
62)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
30 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
30 of
91)
88
Total Points Won
91
|
6-4 3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Juncheng Shang
Player
Alejandro Moro Canas
70%
(
37 of
53)
1st Serve %
75%
(
48 of
64)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
84%
(
31 of
37)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
30 of
48)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
25%
(
13 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
64)
69
Total Points Won
48
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alejandro Davidovich Fokina
Player
Juncheng Shang
64%
(
43 of
67)
1st Serve %
65%
(
45 of
69)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
29 of
45)
67%
(
16 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
27%
(
18 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
28 of
69)
77
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Juncheng Shang
Player
Miomir Kecmanovic
69%
(
74 of
108)
1st Serve %
70%
(
87 of
124)
8
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
5
65%
(
48 of
74)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
57 of
87)
53%
(
18 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
39%
(
42 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
50 of
124)
116
Total Points Won
116
|
7-6(5) 4-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alexander Bublik
Player
Juncheng Shang
65%
(
37 of
57)
1st Serve %
66%
(
29 of
44)
10
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
19 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
59
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Juncheng Shang
Player
Jordan Thompson
53%
(
38 of
72)
1st Serve %
52%
(
29 of
56)
1
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
2
63%
(
24 of
38)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
53%
(
18 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
42%
(
30 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
71
Total Points Won
57
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Juncheng Shang
Player
Facundo Bagnis
53%
(
35 of
66)
1st Serve %
72%
(
54 of
75)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
63%
(
22 of
35)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
28 of
54)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
41%
(
27 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
38 of
75)
77
Total Points Won
64
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Matthew William Donald Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Jacob Bradshaw
Player
Matthew William Donald
58%
(
41 of
71)
1st Serve %
63%
(
45 of
71)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
30%
(
9 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
42%
(
30 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
36 of
71)
77
Total Points Won
65
|
6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matthew William Donald
Player
Eyal Shyovitz
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve %
67%
(
56 of
83)
0
Aces
2
9
Double Faults
5
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
26%
(
5 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
39%
(
21 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
44 of
83)
77
Total Points Won
60
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Filip Peliwo
Player
Matthew William Donald
63%
(
34 of
54)
1st Serve %
69%
(
36 of
52)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
7
62%
(
21 of
34)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
41%
(
22 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
62
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Adam Heinonen
Player
Matthew William Donald
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve %
47%
(
20 of
43)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
15 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
56
Total Points Won
32
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jakub Paul
Player
Matthew William Donald
68%
(
43 of
63)
1st Serve %
70%
(
48 of
69)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
8
56%
(
24 of
43)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
44%
(
28 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
37 of
69)
72
Total Points Won
60
|
6-2 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mika Brunold
Player
Matthew William Donald
64%
(
57 of
89)
1st Serve %
67%
(
52 of
78)
4
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
7
60%
(
34 of
57)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
67%
(
8 of
12)
Break Points Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
46%
(
41 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
40 of
78)
88
Total Points Won
79
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Matthew William Donald
Player
Michael Zhu
63%
(
39 of
62)
1st Serve %
64%
(
46 of
72)
1
Aces
1
9
Double Faults
4
59%
(
23 of
39)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
20 of
46)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
47%
(
29 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
40 of
72)
73
Total Points Won
61
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matthew William Donald
Player
Jakub Nicod
61%
(
55 of
90)
1st Serve %
58%
(
51 of
88)
0
Aces
5
9
Double Faults
1
58%
(
32 of
55)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
40%
(
14 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
14 of
37)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
49%
(
44 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
45 of
88)
91
Total Points Won
87
|
1-6 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Fabien Salle
Player
Matthew William Donald
55%
(
46 of
84)
1st Serve %
69%
(
54 of
78)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
33 of
54)
61%
(
23 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
38%
(
32 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
33 of
78)
85
Total Points Won
77
|
7-6(9) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
view more
Shang Vs Donald Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Juncheng Shang
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
