Juncheng Shang vs Philip Sekulic Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Shang vs Sekulic analysis and find out who is favored!
Juncheng Shang vs Philip Sekulic Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Shang has won 52.19% of points on his second serve, while Sekulic has won 50.76%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Shang, in recent form, has won 45.91% of his opponent's second serve points, while Sekulic has won 48.36%. The same stats for first serve returns are 31.13% and 28.49% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Shang has saved 62.35% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Sekulic has saved 59.32% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Shang has won 58.93% of matches played (W/L 33/ 23), with Sekulic winning 54.41% (W/L 37/ 31) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Shang has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 67% (W/L 30/ 15), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 50% (W/L 7/ 7). Sekulic has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 67% (W/L 4/ 2), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Shang has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 59.09% of matches (W/L 13/ 9), where as Sekulic has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 48.65% of matches (W/L 18/ 19). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Shang has played against opponents with an average rank of 218.41 while Sekulic has played against players with an average rank of 249.44.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Shang has won 54% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Sekulic has won 33% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Shang has converted 31.37% of breakpoint opportunities, and Sekulic has converted 41.43% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Shang 0 - 0 Sekulic
5
Total
0
Mast
1
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
4
Minor
124
Rank
124
High
19
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
267
Rank
263
High
20
Age
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
63% (96-57)
Career Total W/L
55% (83-67)
64% (9-5)
YTD W/L
41% (7-10)
$637,670
Career Prize Money
$92,390
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Juncheng Shang | Philip Sekulic |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 64% (9/5) | 41% (7/10) |
Sets Win/Loss | 55% (22/18) | 47% (18/20) |
Games Win/Loss | 49% (192/197) | 49% (182/188) |
Hard Win/Loss | 64% (9/5) | 50% (7/7) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/3) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.27 | 0.36 |
Aces Total | 51 | 65 |
DFs per game | 0.19 | 0.25 |
DFs Total | 37 | 44 |
Avg Match Time | 2:17:58 | 1:55:16 |
Avg Opp Rank | 69.21 | 317.59 |
1st Serve % | 60% (754/1256) | 63% (758/1205) |
1st Serve W% | 68% (513/754) | 67% (510/758) |
2nd Serve W% | 52% (263/502) | 51% (227/447) |
BPs Won% Total | 29% (39/133) | 44% (41/94) |
Return Pts W% | 37% (461/1248) | 37% (423/1142) |
Slam W/L | 67% (2/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Masters W/L | 67% (4/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 60% (3/2) | 0% (0/1) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 47% (7/8) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 64% (7/11) | 41% (7/17) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 67% (2/3) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 75% (6/8) | 43% (3/7) |
Deciding Set W% | 71% (5/7) | 0% (0/4) |
1st set W, W | 71% (7/5) | 70% (10/7) |
1st set W, L | 29% (7/2) | 30% (10/3) |
1st set L, W | 57% (7/4) | 0% (7/0) |
Juncheng Shang Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
Alejandro Davidovich Fokina
Player
Juncheng Shang
64%
(
43 of
67)
1st Serve %
65%
(
45 of
69)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
29 of
45)
67%
(
16 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
27%
(
18 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
28 of
69)
77
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Juncheng Shang
Player
Miomir Kecmanovic
69%
(
74 of
108)
1st Serve %
70%
(
87 of
124)
8
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
5
65%
(
48 of
74)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
57 of
87)
53%
(
18 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
39%
(
42 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
50 of
124)
116
Total Points Won
116
|
7-6(5) 4-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
R2 |
Alexander Bublik
Player
Juncheng Shang
65%
(
37 of
57)
1st Serve %
66%
(
29 of
44)
10
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
19 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
59
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Juncheng Shang
Player
Jordan Thompson
53%
(
38 of
72)
1st Serve %
52%
(
29 of
56)
1
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
2
63%
(
24 of
38)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
53%
(
18 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
42%
(
30 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
71
Total Points Won
57
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Juncheng Shang
Player
Facundo Bagnis
53%
(
35 of
66)
1st Serve %
72%
(
54 of
75)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
63%
(
22 of
35)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
28 of
54)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
41%
(
27 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
38 of
75)
77
Total Points Won
64
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Juncheng Shang
Player
Yoshihito Nishioka
59%
(
65 of
110)
1st Serve %
66%
(
82 of
124)
6
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
75%
(
49 of
65)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
59 of
82)
51%
(
23 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
16 of
42)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
35%
(
38 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
49 of
124)
121
Total Points Won
113
|
4-6 7-6(12) 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Radu Albot
Player
Juncheng Shang
68%
(
63 of
92)
1st Serve %
63%
(
69 of
109)
6
Aces
8
4
Double Faults
7
67%
(
42 of
63)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
43 of
69)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
15 of
40)
30%
(
6 of
20)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
40%
(
37 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
51 of
109)
106
Total Points Won
95
|
4-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
R3 |
Carlos Alcaraz
Player
Juncheng Shang
56%
(
19 of
34)
1st Serve %
52%
(
26 of
50)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
84%
(
16 of
19)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
87%
(
13 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
15%
(
5 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
59
Total Points Won
25
|
6-1 6-1 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
R2 |
Juncheng Shang
Player
Sumit Nagal
67%
(
86 of
128)
1st Serve %
66%
(
73 of
110)
8
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
1
72%
(
62 of
86)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
49 of
73)
60%
(
25 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
32%
(
41 of
128)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
36 of
110)
123
Total Points Won
115
|
2-6 6-3 7-5 6-4 | H2H |
view more
Philip Sekulic Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Gianluca Mager
Player
Philip Sekulic
44%
(
20 of
45)
1st Serve %
66%
(
45 of
68)
6
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
90%
(
18 of
20)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
12 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
34 of
68)
67
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Liam Draxl
Player
Philip Sekulic
64%
(
74 of
115)
1st Serve %
66%
(
78 of
118)
2
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
7
73%
(
54 of
74)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
55 of
78)
56%
(
23 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
33%
(
38 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
44 of
118)
121
Total Points Won
112
|
6-7(7) 6-4 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Francisco Comesana
Player
Philip Sekulic
50%
(
43 of
86)
1st Serve %
67%
(
63 of
94)
5
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
6
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
36 of
63)
49%
(
21 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
37%
(
32 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
43 of
94)
97
Total Points Won
83
|
6-7(5) 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Geoffrey Blancaneaux
Player
Philip Sekulic
56%
(
33 of
59)
1st Serve %
67%
(
48 of
72)
2
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
3
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
65%
(
17 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
27%
(
16 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
30 of
72)
73
Total Points Won
58
|
7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Philip Sekulic
Player
Evgeny Donskoy
63%
(
34 of
54)
1st Serve %
54%
(
32 of
59)
7
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
85%
(
29 of
34)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
15 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
27 of
59)
66
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Philip Sekulic
Player
Tung-Lin Wu
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve %
63%
(
36 of
57)
5
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
10 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
24 of
57)
61
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Philip Sekulic
Player
Yusuke Takahashi
45%
(
25 of
56)
1st Serve %
63%
(
34 of
54)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
38%
(
21 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
65
Total Points Won
45
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Philip Sekulic
Player
Vadym Ursu
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve %
54%
(
30 of
56)
4
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
6
62%
(
21 of
34)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
7 of
26)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
19 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
33 of
56)
64
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Dalibor Svrcina
Player
Philip Sekulic
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve %
58%
(
38 of
65)
0
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
16 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
65)
65
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Benjamin Bonzi
Player
Philip Sekulic
46%
(
23 of
50)
1st Serve %
54%
(
25 of
46)
5
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
74%
(
17 of
23)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
16 of
25)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
57
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H |
view more