Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Junior A. Ore vs Matic Spec Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Ore vs Spec analysis and find out who is favored!
Junior A. Ore vs Matic Spec Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Ore has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Spec has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Ore, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Spec has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Ore has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Spec has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Ore has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Spec winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Ore has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 64% (W/L 88/ 50), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 47/ 32). Spec has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 74% (W/L 14/ 5), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 94/ 59).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Ore winning 1 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Ore winning 2 and Spec winning 3. The last match between Ore and Spec was at the M15 Orange Park, 16-04-2019, First, Clay with Matic Spec getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Ore and Spec have played a deciding set 1 times, with Ore winning 1 times and Spec 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Ore winning 0, and Spec 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Ore has played against opponents with an average rank of while Spec has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Ore has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Spec has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Ore has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Spec has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Ore 1 - 1 Spec
Ret.
Rank
737
High
31
Age
L
Plays
1
Total1
0
Hard0
1
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
819
Rank
710
High
29
Age
Plays
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
Form
L
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
62% (146-89)
Career Total W/L
64% (167-95)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Junior A. Ore | Matic Spec |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 3 |
| Games Won | 23 | 28 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-1 | |||||
| 6-0 3-6 12-10 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Junior A. Ore | Matic Spec |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Junior A. Ore Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats 
Patrick Kypson
Player
Junior A. Ore
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve %
63%
(
30 of
48)
5
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
4
87%
(
27 of
31)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
7 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
58
Total Points Won
31
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Junior A. Ore
Player
Sebastian Sevilla
55%
(
22 of
40)
1st Serve %
59%
(
38 of
64)
9
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
6
91%
(
20 of
22)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
5 of
26)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
8 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
64)
65
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-3 7-5 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-4 7-5 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 7-5 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 7-5 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 7-5 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
view more
Matic Spec Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Guy Den Ouden
Player
Matic Spec
63%
(
63 of
100)
1st Serve %
64%
(
59 of
92)
6
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
3
65%
(
41 of
63)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
34 of
59)
46%
(
17 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
42%
(
42 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
46 of
92)
104
Total Points Won
88
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Matic Spec
Player
Nikolay Vylegzhanin
61%
(
55 of
90)
1st Serve %
66%
(
49 of
74)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
60%
(
33 of
55)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
60%
(
21 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
40%
(
36 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
29 of
74)
83
Total Points Won
81
|
1-6 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matic Spec
Player
Francesco Passaro
61%
(
59 of
97)
1st Serve %
58%
(
62 of
107)
0
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
4
61%
(
36 of
59)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
35 of
62)
50%
(
19 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
21 of
45)
35%
(
6 of
17)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
43%
(
42 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
51 of
107)
106
Total Points Won
98
|
4-6 6-2 7-6(0) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Hikaru Shiraishi
Player
Matic Spec
63%
(
42 of
67)
1st Serve %
70%
(
58 of
83)
3
Aces
10
0
Double Faults
1
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
41 of
58)
80%
(
20 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
16 of
25)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
19%
(
13 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
26 of
83)
80
Total Points Won
70
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matic Spec
Player
Christoph Negritu
59%
(
60 of
102)
1st Serve %
69%
(
63 of
91)
2
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
0
63%
(
38 of
60)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
42 of
63)
48%
(
20 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
7 of
28)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
43%
(
44 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
42 of
91)
100
Total Points Won
93
|
6-2 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Pietro Marino
Player
Matic Spec
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve %
67%
(
41 of
61)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
11 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
61)
61
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tim Sandkaulen
Player
Matic Spec
61%
(
46 of
75)
1st Serve %
78%
(
74 of
95)
5
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
49 of
74)
69%
(
20 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
28%
(
21 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
35 of
95)
89
Total Points Won
81
|
7-5 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Jorge Brian Panta Herreros
Player
Matic Spec
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve %
59%
(
37 of
63)
5
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
6
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
26 of
37)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
29 of
63)
64
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | |||
view more
Ore Vs Spec Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
