Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Jurgen Briand vs Arthur Cazaux Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Briand vs Cazaux analysis and find out who is favored!
Jurgen Briand vs Arthur Cazaux Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Briand has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Cazaux has won 53.73%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Briand, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Cazaux has won 48.82%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 29.48% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Briand has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Cazaux has saved 62.26% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Briand has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 2), with Cazaux winning 59.72% (W/L 43/ 29) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Briand has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 38/ 24), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 58% (W/L 41/ 30). Cazaux has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 74% (W/L 87/ 30), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 50% (W/L 15/ 15).
- Player level: In the last year, Briand has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/ 1), where as Cazaux has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 68.89% of matches (W/L 31/ 14). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Briand winning 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Briand winning 1 and Cazaux winning 2. The last match between Briand and Cazaux was at the Cassis Challenger, 05-09-2021, Q1 round, Hard with Arthur Cazaux getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:45:21.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Briand and Cazaux have played a deciding set 1 times, with Briand winning 0 times and Cazaux 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Briand winning 1, and Cazaux 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Briand has played against opponents with an average rank of 401 while Cazaux has played against players with an average rank of 212.07.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Briand has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Cazaux has won 47% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Briand has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Cazaux has converted 35.36% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Briand 0 - 1 Cazaux
898
Rank
403
High
25
Age
R
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard1
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
75
Rank
74
High
21
Age
R
Plays
W
L
L
L
W
W
L
L
L
L
Form
L
W
W
W
L
L
W
L
L
L
60% (157-106)
Career Total W/L
64% (152-85)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
65% (13-7)
$0
Career Prize Money
$466,125
0
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Jurgen Briand | Arthur Cazaux |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 1 | 2 |
| Games Won | 16 | 19 |
| Aces (Total) | 2 | 8 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:45:21 | 2:45:21 |
| 1st Serve % | 52% (58/111) | 50% (58/115) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 64% (37/58) | 72% (42/58) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 51% (27/53) | 53% (30/57) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 31% (4/13) | 55% (6/11) |
| Return Points W% | 37% (43/115) | 42% (47/111) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-7(6) 7-5 |
Stats 
Arthur Cazaux
Player
Jurgen Briand
50%
(
58 of
115)
1st Serve %
52%
(
58 of
111)
8
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
72%
(
42 of
58)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
37 of
58)
53%
(
30 of
57)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
27 of
53)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
37%
(
43 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
47 of
111)
119
Total Points Won
107
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Jurgen Briand | Arthur Cazaux |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 65% (13/7) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 66% (33/17) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 56% (279/219) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 71% (12/5) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.75 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 184 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.14 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 35 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:56:21 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 205.65 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 59% (890/1496) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 77% (686/890) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 55% (334/606) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 39% (59/153) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 38% (579/1539) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 75% (3/1) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 57% (4/3) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 86% (6/1) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 71% (10/14) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 60% (3/5) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 64% (7/11) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 60% (3/5) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 92% (13/12) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 8% (13/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 33% (6/2) |
Jurgen Briand Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Anton Matusevich
Player
Jurgen Briand
58%
(
39 of
67)
1st Serve %
50%
(
44 of
88)
5
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
3
87%
(
34 of
39)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
31 of
44)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
24%
(
16 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
36 of
88)
87
Total Points Won
68
|
7-5 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Michael Geerts
Player
Jurgen Briand
61%
(
50 of
82)
1st Serve %
56%
(
54 of
97)
0
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
3
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
32 of
54)
63%
(
20 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
34%
(
28 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
40 of
97)
94
Total Points Won
85
|
3-6 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kenny de Schepper
Player
Jurgen Briand
69%
(
55 of
80)
1st Serve %
57%
(
52 of
91)
8
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
1
71%
(
39 of
55)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
40%
(
10 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
39%
(
31 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
39 of
91)
88
Total Points Won
83
|
1-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Evan Furness
Player
Jurgen Briand
71%
(
52 of
73)
1st Serve %
51%
(
35 of
68)
1
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
5
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
26 of
35)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
26 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
30 of
68)
77
Total Points Won
64
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jurgen Briand
Player
Daniil Glinka
59%
(
36 of
61)
1st Serve %
64%
(
44 of
69)
4
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
2
89%
(
32 of
36)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
30 of
44)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
17%
(
2 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
28%
(
17 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
28 of
69)
72
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jurgen Briand
Player
Maik Steiner
59%
(
46 of
78)
1st Serve %
60%
(
40 of
67)
7
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
1
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
38%
(
30 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
28 of
67)
76
Total Points Won
69
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Titouan Droguet
Player
Jurgen Briand
59%
(
79 of
134)
1st Serve %
49%
(
52 of
107)
8
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
5
71%
(
56 of
79)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
40 of
52)
51%
(
28 of
55)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
27 of
55)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
37%
(
50 of
134)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
40 of
107)
124
Total Points Won
117
|
6-3 5-7 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Antoine Ghibaudo
Player
Jurgen Briand
69%
(
65 of
94)
1st Serve %
59%
(
46 of
78)
1
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
3
65%
(
42 of
65)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
34 of
46)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
39%
(
37 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
25 of
78)
82
Total Points Won
90
|
1-6 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Pedro Boscardin Dias
Player
Jurgen Briand
76%
(
56 of
74)
1st Serve %
66%
(
54 of
82)
2
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
5
63%
(
35 of
56)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
80%
(
8 of
10)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
42%
(
31 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
45 of
82)
88
Total Points Won
68
|
5-7 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jurgen Briand
Player
Jakub Paul
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve %
62%
(
36 of
58)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
65%
(
22 of
34)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
16 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
32 of
58)
65
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Arthur Cazaux Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Matteo Arnaldi
Player
Arthur Cazaux
60%
(
24 of
40)
1st Serve %
69%
(
24 of
35)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
71%
(
17 of
24)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
31%
(
5 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
45%
(
18 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
39
Total Points Won
36
|
5-5 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Harold Mayot
Player
Arthur Cazaux
57%
(
48 of
84)
1st Serve %
58%
(
46 of
79)
9
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
32 of
46)
44%
(
16 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
40%
(
34 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
30 of
79)
80
Total Points Won
83
|
6-4 5-7 1-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Matteo Berrettini
Player
Arthur Cazaux
58%
(
42 of
72)
1st Serve %
50%
(
46 of
92)
3
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
2
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
36%
(
26 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
41 of
92)
87
Total Points Won
77
|
3-6 6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Arthur Cazaux
Player
Adam Walton
51%
(
35 of
69)
1st Serve %
65%
(
43 of
66)
6
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
2
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
30 of
43)
65%
(
22 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
32%
(
22 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
23 of
66)
70
Total Points Won
65
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Benjamin Hassan
Player
Arthur Cazaux
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve %
45%
(
29 of
65)
0
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
2
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
23 of
29)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
12 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
25 of
65)
66
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Andrey Rublev
Player
Arthur Cazaux
72%
(
38 of
53)
1st Serve %
53%
(
31 of
58)
7
Aces
16
0
Double Faults
2
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
25 of
31)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
13 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
21 of
58)
61
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Arthur Cazaux
Player
Lorenzo Musetti
61%
(
46 of
75)
1st Serve %
67%
(
49 of
73)
8
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
32 of
49)
66%
(
19 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
32%
(
24 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
28 of
73)
79
Total Points Won
69
|
6-4 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Arthur Cazaux
Player
Giulio Zeppieri
69%
(
42 of
61)
1st Serve %
62%
(
53 of
85)
12
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
3
90%
(
38 of
42)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
38 of
53)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
9%
(
1 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
11 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
30 of
85)
80
Total Points Won
66
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Arthur Cazaux
Player
Damir Dzumhur
57%
(
36 of
63)
1st Serve %
78%
(
40 of
51)
8
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
0
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
32%
(
20 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
19 of
51)
62
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Felix Auger Aliassime
Player
Arthur Cazaux
59%
(
53 of
90)
1st Serve %
56%
(
57 of
101)
6
Aces
12
7
Double Faults
2
74%
(
39 of
53)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
42 of
57)
43%
(
16 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
18 of
44)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
83%
(
5 of
6)
39%
(
35 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
41 of
101)
96
Total Points Won
95
|
7-5 2-6 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
view more
Briand Vs Cazaux Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
