Kamil Majchrzak vs Karen Khachanov Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Khachanov has shown superior performance on the second serve by winning 46.6% of points, compared to Majchrzak's 43.26%.
• In return games, Khachanov again leads, securing 46.57% of points on his opponents' second serve, whereas Majchrzak achieves 41.73%.
• When under pressure, Khachanov saves 58.11% of breakpoints, slightly outperforming Majchrzak's 56.25% conversion.
• Even though both players have similar match win percentages in the past year, Khachanov edges slightly with 65.67% victory rate.
• Considering surfaces, Khachanov is strongest on grass with a 63% win rate, while Majchrzak performs best on hard courts with 67% wins.
• Khachanov competes more regularly at the Main tour level, while Majchrzak plays mostly in Challenger/ITF tournaments.
• Directly head-to-head, Khachanov has dominantly won all 4 of their previous matches against Majchrzak, with 10 sets to 1.
• When matches go to a deciding set, Khachanov maintains a 55% win rate; Majchrzak has a higher rate at 60% but with lesser comparison context.
• In extreme pressure conditions, such as tiebreaks, Khachanov has secured all 3 played against Majchrzak.
• Khachanov competes against a much stronger level of competition, facing players with an average rank of 66.16, compared to Majchrzak's 195.
• Finally, Khachanov slightly surpasses Majchrzak in break point conversions with a 34.73% success rate over Marjchrzak’s 30.32%.

Editorial Prediction (August 28, 2025, UTC):

Considering the detailed head-to-head statistics and recent performance patterns, Khachanov appears to have a consistent edge over Majchrzak. The direct match history is heavily in favor of Khachanov, showing clear dominance in their previous encounters.

Khachanov not only demonstrates stronger service and return game statistics but also has greater experience at higher competition levels, which might be critical in adjusting tactics during high-stakes moments.

While Majchrzak offers competitiveness in terms of deciding set performance, the analytical edge in pressure situations still favors Khachanov.

Given these comprehensive factors, Khachanov is the more likely contender to claim victory in their upcoming match.