Kamilla Rakhimova vs Peyton Stearns Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Recent performance on the second serve shows Stearns narrowly leading, winning 39.36% of points versus Rakhimova's 37.7%. Can this slight edge translate to a match victory? It's possible, given the correlation between second serve stats and overall match outcomes.
• When analyzing return games, Stearns again holds a minor advantage, winning 52.83% of points on the opponent's second serve compared to Rakhimova's 51.97%. Their success rates on the first serve return are nearly identical, with Rakhimova at 32.8% and Stearns at 32.46%.
• Saving breakpoints is crucial in tight matches. Stearns leads in this area as well, saving 50.16% of breakpoints they face, while Rakhimova saves 49.71%.
• In terms of match wins over the past year, Stearns has a slight edge, winning 54% of her matches compared to Rakhimova's 50%.
• The preferred surface for both players is indoor hard courts. Stearns holds a better win rate here at 68%, surpassing Rakhimova's 65% success rate.
• Stearns' matches tend to be against higher-ranked opponents, with an average ranking of 69.92, compared to Rakhimova who faces opponents averaging a rank of 140.7.
• In direct head-to-head encounters, Stearns leads with one win against Rakhimova in their only meeting, won on clay after a three-set battle.
• Under extreme pressure, neither player has been involved in tiebreaks in their head-to-head history, indicating a potential area of unpredictability.
• Deciding set performance shows Stearns as the stronger contender, winning 60% of such scenarios in the past year, compared to Rakhimova's 37%.
• Despite Stearns' advantage in these metrics, Rakhimova excels slightly in breakpoint conversion, achieving a 36.68% success rate compared to Stearns' 34%.

Editorial Prediction (June 25, 2025, UTC):

Analyzing the current form and historical match statistics, Stearns appears to possess several subtle advantages over Rakhimova. Her slightly superior second serve and return game performance may prove crucial in high-pressure situations.

Their head-to-head history, though limited, favors Stearns due to her previous victory. Confidence from playing and succeeding against higher-ranked opponents could further tip the scale in Stearns' favor.

While both players show a preference for indoor hard courts, Stearns leads in both win rates on this surface and overall match win percentages over the past year. This competitive experience and record indicate a potential upper hand for Stearns.

Therefore, given these comprehensive assessments, Stearns is predicted to be the more likely winner of the upcoming match.