Katrina Scott vs Hanne Vandewinkel Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 26 Oct at 12:52 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
K. Scott vs H. Vandewinkel

USA
1
Win
Played
0
Win

BEL
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Scott 1 - 0 Vandewinkel
They have played 3 sets in total, with Katrina Scott winning 2 and Hanne Vandewinkel winning 1. The last match between Katrina Scott and Hanne Vandewinkel was at the Queretaro Open - Queretaro, 25-10-2025, Round: SF, Surface: Clay, with Katrina Scott getting the victory 6-7(5) 6-2 7-5.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Scott | 1 |
| Vandewinkel | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(SF) Queretaro Open - Queretaro(10-25-25)
K. Scott vs H. Vandewinkel H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $176,000 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 56.54% (134-103) | Career Total W/L | 68.12% (188-88) |
| 1 | Clay | 0 |
| 4 | Titles | 10 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0.00% (0-1) | YTD Win/Loss | 100.00% (1-0) |
K. Scott vs H. Vandewinkel Match Preview:
- Katrina Scott recently has a slight edge in second serve performance, securing 39.39% of points compared to Hanne Vandewinkel's 37.08%.
- Could Katrina Scott's slightly superior second serve game give her an advantage? It's possible, considering the high correlation of this stat with match outcomes.
- When it comes to returning second serves, Hanne Vandewinkel excels with 52.70% success, over Scott's 49.63%.
- In first serve returns, Scott has a narrow lead, winning 34.7% of points compared to Vandewinkel's 32.68%.
- Both players are close in breakpoint saving ability, with Vandewinkel saving 49.33% and Scott saving 49.25%.
- Performance over the last year shows Scott winning 61.11% of her matches, while Vandewinkel has won 68.60%.
- On clay, Scott performs best with a 58% win rate, whereas Vandewinkel's best surface is hard courts at the same win rate.
- Does playing on hard courts favor Vandewinkel? Yes, given her best performance comes on this surface.
- In tournaments > $10K, Scott has a 62.86% win rate, compared to Vandewinkel's 72.37%.
- Vandewinkel has faced more challenging opponents with an average rank of 276.63 versus Scott’s 387.61.
- If the match goes to a deciding set, Vandewinkel is notably stronger, winning 75% compared to Scott’s 40%.
Editorial Prediction (October 26, 2025, UTC):
The head-to-head comparison between Katrina Scott and Hanne Vandewinkel presents an intriguing matchup with both players showing strengths in different areas.
Although Scott holds a slight edge in second serve performance, Vandewinkel's ability to return second serves could neutralize this advantage. Additionally, Vandewinkel's superior performance in deciding sets highlights her resilience under pressure.
Evaluating recent performance and overall quality of opponents, Vandewinkel seems to have an edge, facing higher-ranked competition and maintaining a better win rate on more competitive surfaces such as hard courts.
In conclusion, while Scott has displayed solid skills, the combination of Vandewinkel’s return game, competitive experience, and surface preference suggests she is more likely to win this upcoming matchup.
Katrina Scott vs Hanne Vandewinkel Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
K. Scott vs H. Vandewinkel H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 19 | Games Won | 14 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 9 |
| 3:3:5 | Average Match Time | 3:3:5 |
| 79% (85/107) | 1st Serve % | 69% (77/111) |
| 55% (47/85) | 1st Serve Win % | 58% (45/77) |
| 41% (9/22) | 2nd Serve Win % | 26% (9/34) |
| 53% (10/19) | Break Pts Won % | 70% (7/10) |
| 51% (57/111) | Return Points Win % | 48% (51/107) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
K. Scott Recent Matches Played
H. Vandewinkel Recent Matches Played

K. Scott vs H. Vandewinkel Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 56.54% (134/103) | YTD Win/Loss | 68.12% (188/88) |
| 57.19% (314/235) | Sets Win/Loss | 63.87% (403/228) |
| 53.41% (2731/2382) | Games Win/Loss | 55.82% (3240/2564) |
| 57.45% (81/60) | Hard Win/Loss | 74.00% (74/26) |
| 58.21% (39/28) | Clay Win/Loss | 64.43% (96/53) |
| 47.83% (11/12) | Indoor Hard W/L | 69.23% (18/8) |
| 50.00% (3/3) | Grass Win/Loss | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 0.3 | Aces Per Game | 0.14 |
| 744 | Aces Total | 388 |
| 0.21 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.41 |
| 520 | Total Double Faults | 1160 |
| 1:42:51 | Average Match Time | 1:47:29 |
| 407.05 | Average Opponent Rank | 430.99 |
| 62% (9750/15710) | 1st Serve % | 67% (11835/17748) |
| 64% (6254/9750) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (7364/11835) |
| 48% (2847/5960) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (2658/5913) |
| 46% (910/1976) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 49% (1252/2569) |
| 45% (7203/15933) | Return Points Win % | 48% (8849/18370) |
| 38.46% (5/8) | Slam W/L | 33.33% (2/4) |
| 0.00% (0/5) | Masters W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 40.00% (2/3) |
| 0.00% (0/9) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 61.76% (126/78) | Challenger W/L | 67.80% (139/66) |
| 50.00% (3/3) | Futures W/L | 76.27% (45/14) |
| 57% (133/234) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 68% (187/274) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 57% (32/56) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 51% (28/55) |
| 40% (31/78) | Deciding Set Win % | 66% (53/80) |
| 83% (142/118) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 92% (171/158) |
| 16% (142/23) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 7% (171/12) |
| 17% (95/16) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 29% (105/30) |