Keegan Rice vs Christian Langmo Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 03 Jul at 09:22 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
K. Rice vs C. Langmo

CAN
1
Win
Played
0
Win

USA
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Rice 1 - 0 Langmo
They have played 3 sets in total, with Keegan Rice winning 2 and Christian Langmo winning 1. The last match between Keegan Rice and Christian Langmo was at the M25 Laval, 03-07-2025, Round: R2, Surface: Hard, with Keegan Rice getting the victory 6-3 3-6 7-5.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Rice | 1 |
| Langmo | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R2) M25 Laval(07-03-25)
K. Rice vs C. Langmo H2H Profile
K. Rice vs C. Langmo Match Preview:
- Langmo has demonstrated stronger second serve performance in recent months, securing 48.61% of these points compared to Rice’s 38.51%. Could this give Langmo an advantage in upcoming rallies? Yes, it often predicts potential winners.
- In returning second serves, both players are quite similar, with Langmo winning 45.51% and Rice 45.45%. This parity highlights the need to consider other factors.
- Rice has an edge returning first serves, winning 31.6% of points versus Langmo’s 21.99%. Is this crucial? It often influences match favorites.
- Under pressure, Langmo is more resilient, saving 59.25% of breakpoints, significantly higher than Rice’s 36.36%. This is critical for in-game strategy.
- When assessing overall match outcomes from the past year, Rice boasts a higher win rate (66.67% vs. Langmo’s 60.87%), indicating consistent performance.
- Langmo thrives on grass surfaces with a 71% win rate, whereas Rice excels on hard courts with 53% success—each player’s favored surface could play a role.
- Despite facing stronger opponents (average rank 136.83), Rice holds an impressive track record, compared to Langmo, who plays against opponents with an average rank of 373.3.
- In deciding set scenarios, Langmo excels with a 78% win rate, unlike Rice, who has not converted any, hinting at Langmo’s resilience in high-stakes moments.
- Rice converts breakpoints more effectively, at 47.06% compared to Langmo’s 21.15%. Does this showcase Rice's strategic edge during crucial moments? Likely, yes.
Editorial Prediction (July 3, 2025, UTC):
The upcoming tennis clash between Langmo and Rice promises an intriguing battle. Langmo's recent second serve prowess and breakpoint-saving ability under pressure underscore their reliability in tight scenarios.
Conversely, Rice boasts superior performance against tougher opponents and excels at converting breakpoints on hard courts, their favored surface. Rice's edge in challenging matchups suggests resilience and adaptability.
Although Langmo’s resilience in deciding sets is notable, Rice's formidable first serve return and breakpoint conversion skills cannot be overlooked.
Considering current statistics and trends, Rice appears to have a slight edge and is most likely to win this upcoming match.
Keegan Rice vs Christian Langmo Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
K. Rice vs C. Langmo H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 16 | Games Won | 14 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 6 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 5 |
| 2:51:53 | Average Match Time | 2:51:53 |
| 72% (65/90) | 1st Serve % | 68% (74/109) |
| 62% (40/65) | 1st Serve Win % | 59% (44/74) |
| 48% (12/25) | 2nd Serve Win % | 37% (13/35) |
| 55% (6/11) | Break Pts Won % | 45% (5/11) |
| 48% (52/109) | Return Points Win % | 42% (38/90) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
K. Rice Recent Matches Played
C. Langmo Recent Matches Played

K. Rice vs C. Langmo Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 45.16% (14/17) | YTD Win/Loss | 57.21% (262/196) |
| 46.27% (31/36) | Sets Win/Loss | 55.58% (588/470) |
| 48.80% (284/298) | Games Win/Loss | 51.65% (5323/4983) |
| 54.17% (13/11) | Hard Win/Loss | 58.79% (214/150) |
| 33.33% (1/2) | Clay Win/Loss | 51.25% (41/39) |
| 0.00% (0/4) | Indoor Hard W/L | 28.57% (2/5) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 71.43% (5/2) |
| 0.14 | Aces Per Game | 0.58 |
| 40 | Aces Total | 2927 |
| 0.32 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.25 |
| 91 | Total Double Faults | 1278 |
| 1:23:57 | Average Match Time | 1:33:56 |
| 313.52 | Average Opponent Rank | 469.54 |
| 60% (1015/1699) | 1st Serve % | 63% (17501/27875) |
| 64% (646/1015) | 1st Serve Win % | 74% (12871/17501) |
| 40% (275/684) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (5193/10374) |
| 48% (72/150) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 38% (928/2442) |
| 41% (678/1647) | Return Points Win % | 37% (10373/28351) |
| 20.00% (2/8) | Challenger W/L | 47.37% (72/80) |
| 57.14% (12/9) | Futures W/L | 62.09% (190/116) |
| 45% (14/31) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 58% (259/450) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (2/2) |
| 75% (3/4) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 54% (85/156) |
| 40% (2/5) | Deciding Set Win % | 56% (82/147) |
| 93% (14/13) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (248/212) |
| 7% (14/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (248/36) |
| 6% (17/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 24% (209/50) |