Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Keegan Smith vs Omni Kumar Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Smith vs Kumar analysis and find out who is favored!
Keegan Smith vs Omni Kumar Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Smith has won 49.63% of points on his second serve, while Kumar has won 55.17%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Smith, in recent form, has won 48.03% of his opponent's second serve points, while Kumar has won 57.72%. The same stats for first serve returns are 30.63% and 35.76% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Smith has saved 60.36% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Kumar has saved 51.98% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Smith has won 57.75% of matches played (W/L 41/ 30), with Kumar winning 65.48% (W/L 55/ 29) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Smith has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 64% (W/L 123/ 68), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 33% (W/L 3/ 6). Kumar has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 64% (W/L 234/ 130), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 25% (W/L 3/ 9).
- Player level: In the last year, Smith has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 65% of matches (W/L 26/ 14), where as Kumar has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 75.86% of matches (W/L 44/ 14). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Smith winning 1 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Smith winning 3 and Kumar winning 2. The last match between Smith and Kumar was at the M25 Calabasas, 26-10-2021, First, Hard with Omni Kumar getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:8:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Smith and Kumar have played a deciding set 1 times, with Smith winning 0 times and Kumar 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 2 tiebreaks against each other with Smith winning 2, and Kumar 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Smith has played against opponents with an average rank of 175.62 while Kumar has played against players with an average rank of 184.62.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Smith has won 44% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Kumar has won 64% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Smith has converted 38.42% of breakpoint opportunities, and Kumar has converted 46.18% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Smith 1 - 1 Kumar
588
Rank
339
High
25
Age
R
Plays
1
Total1
1
Hard1
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
350
Rank
348
High
22
Age
Plays
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
L
Form
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
61% (144-92)
Career Total W/L
63% (241-142)
55% (12-10)
YTD W/L
61% (11-7)
$4,570
Career Prize Money
$20,500
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Keegan Smith | Omni Kumar |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 3 | 2 |
| Games Won | 26 | 27 |
| Aces (Total) | 15 | 11 |
| DFs (Total) | 5 | 9 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:8:0 | 2:8:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 71% (111/156) | 47% (77/164) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 75% (83/111) | 77% (59/77) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 49% (22/45) | 53% (46/87) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 57% (4/7) | 38% (5/13) |
| Return Points W% | 36% (59/164) | 33% (51/156) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 50% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 50% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/1) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-7(6) 6-4 6-2 |
Stats 
Omni Kumar
Player
Keegan Smith
52%
(
45 of
87)
1st Serve %
66%
(
60 of
91)
3
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
4
73%
(
33 of
45)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
43 of
60)
62%
(
26 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
32%
(
28 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
35 of
91)
94
Total Points Won
84
|
||||
| 6-3 7-6(3) |
Stats
Keegan Smith
Player
Omni Kumar
78%
(
51 of
65)
1st Serve %
42%
(
32 of
77)
7
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
6
78%
(
40 of
51)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
26 of
32)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
20 of
45)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
25%
(
16 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
31 of
77)
80
Total Points Won
62
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Keegan Smith | Omni Kumar |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 55% (12/10) | 61% (11/7) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 58% (30/22) | 57% (24/18) |
| Games Win/Loss | 55% (267/222) | 54% (205/177) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 60% (12/8) | 62% (8/5) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) | 60% (3/2) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.54 | 0.21 |
| Aces Total | 128 | 39 |
| DFs per game | 0.24 | 0.14 |
| DFs Total | 57 | 26 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:31:29 | 1:54:38 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 187.09 | 196.44 |
| 1st Serve % | 71% (1011/1427) | 65% (804/1239) |
| 1st Serve W% | 69% (702/1011) | 64% (515/804) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 49% (202/416) | 53% (231/435) |
| BPs Won% Total | 39% (57/145) | 48% (60/124) |
| Return Pts W% | 39% (555/1410) | 42% (512/1212) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 40% (4/6) | 50% (2/2) |
| Futures W/L | 67% (8/4) | 64% (9/5) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 55% (12/22) | 61% (11/18) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (2/4) | 50% (3/6) |
| Deciding Set W% | 25% (2/8) | 67% (4/6) |
| 1st set W, W | 85% (13/11) | 89% (9/8) |
| 1st set W, L | 15% (13/2) | 11% (9/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 11% (9/1) | 33% (9/3) |
Keegan Smith Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Benjamin Lock
Player
Keegan Smith
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve %
78%
(
64 of
82)
10
Aces
9
0
Double Faults
4
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
38 of
64)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
12 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
82)
79
Total Points Won
57
|
7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Antoine Bellier
Player
Keegan Smith
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve %
75%
(
33 of
44)
10
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
83%
(
30 of
36)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
24 of
33)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
23%
(
12 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
14 of
44)
55
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Keegan Smith
Player
Elmar Ejupovic
75%
(
42 of
56)
1st Serve %
62%
(
37 of
60)
5
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
5
88%
(
37 of
42)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
29%
(
4 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
15 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
27 of
60)
68
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Keegan Smith
Player
Santiago Padilla Cote
80%
(
39 of
49)
1st Serve %
69%
(
34 of
49)
8
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
22%
(
11 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
63
Total Points Won
35
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Roberto Cid Subervi
Player
Keegan Smith
71%
(
45 of
63)
1st Serve %
66%
(
37 of
56)
1
Aces
9
5
Double Faults
3
78%
(
35 of
45)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
33%
(
21 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
22 of
56)
64
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mario Gonzalez Fernandez
Player
Keegan Smith
79%
(
85 of
107)
1st Serve %
67%
(
66 of
98)
2
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
5
62%
(
53 of
85)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
45 of
66)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
40%
(
43 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
42 of
98)
106
Total Points Won
99
|
6-4 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Keegan Smith
Player
Michael Geerts
71%
(
54 of
76)
1st Serve %
68%
(
50 of
73)
7
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
1
80%
(
43 of
54)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
78%
(
18 of
23)
11%
(
1 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
28%
(
21 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
24 of
73)
79
Total Points Won
70
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Hady Habib
Player
Keegan Smith
50%
(
54 of
107)
1st Serve %
69%
(
66 of
96)
5
Aces
7
6
Double Faults
3
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
47 of
66)
55%
(
29 of
53)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
42%
(
45 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
34 of
96)
96
Total Points Won
107
|
6-4 0-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Keegan Smith
Player
Lorenzo Giustino
76%
(
85 of
112)
1st Serve %
63%
(
57 of
91)
7
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
7
67%
(
57 of
85)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
40 of
57)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
13 of
34)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
39%
(
44 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
38 of
91)
106
Total Points Won
97
|
6-2 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Keegan Smith
Player
Leopold Zima
78%
(
31 of
40)
1st Serve %
67%
(
30 of
45)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
56%
(
5 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
10 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
56
Total Points Won
29
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Omni Kumar Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Kirill Kivattsev
Player
Omni Kumar
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve %
76%
(
44 of
58)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
83%
(
10 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
23%
(
11 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
26 of
58)
63
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Omni Kumar
Player
Michele Ribecai
74%
(
52 of
70)
1st Serve %
60%
(
39 of
65)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
5
52%
(
27 of
52)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
7 of
26)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
46%
(
32 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
39 of
65)
77
Total Points Won
58
|
7-6(1) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Omni Kumar
Player
Simon Beaupain
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve %
75%
(
33 of
44)
1
Aces
0
-
Double Faults
-
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
57
Total Points Won
35
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Omni Kumar
Player
Kiyan Santino Kasemi
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve %
51%
(
26 of
51)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
38%
(
21 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
64
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Stefano Reitano
Player
Omni Kumar
61%
(
56 of
92)
1st Serve %
73%
(
74 of
101)
1
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
3
70%
(
39 of
56)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
42 of
74)
42%
(
15 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
41%
(
38 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
44 of
101)
98
Total Points Won
95
|
6-2 1-6 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Trevor Svajda
Player
Omni Kumar
50%
(
26 of
52)
1st Serve %
53%
(
28 of
53)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
1
69%
(
18 of
26)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
35%
(
18 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
24 of
53)
58
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Omni Kumar
Player
Elijah Strode
64%
(
57 of
89)
1st Serve %
54%
(
47 of
87)
0
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
6
68%
(
39 of
57)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
35 of
47)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
33 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
34 of
87)
90
Total Points Won
86
|
3-6 6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Andres Andrade
Player
Omni Kumar
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve %
72%
(
47 of
65)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
0
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
10 of
18)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
15 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
32 of
65)
65
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Omni Kumar
Player
Toby Martin
69%
(
60 of
87)
1st Serve %
61%
(
66 of
109)
7
Aces
9
0
Double Faults
2
73%
(
44 of
60)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
45 of
66)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
17 of
43)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
31%
(
27 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
47 of
109)
107
Total Points Won
89
|
6-7(6) 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Omni Kumar
Player
Dian Nedev
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve %
54%
(
30 of
56)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
4
86%
(
25 of
29)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
27%
(
12 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
28 of
56)
61
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Smith Vs Kumar Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
