Ken Onishi vs William Ma Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Onishi vs Ma analysis and find out who is favored!
Ken Onishi vs William Ma Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Onishi has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Ma has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Onishi, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Ma has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Onishi has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Ma has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Onishi has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Ma winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Onishi has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 51% (W/L 74/ 71), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 33% (W/L 3/ 6). Ma has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 50% (W/L 9/ 9), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 43% (W/L 46/ 61).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Onishi winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Onishi winning 2 and Ma winning 0. The last match between Onishi and Ma was at the Australia F1, 23-02-2015, Q3, Hard with Ken Onishi getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Onishi and Ma have played a deciding set 0 times, with Onishi winning 0 times and Ma 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Onishi winning 0, and Ma 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Onishi has played against opponents with an average rank of while Ma has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Onishi has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Ma has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Onishi has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Ma has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Onishi 1 - 0 Ma
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Ret.
Rank
684
High
28
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
High
28
Age
R
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
49% (109-113)
Career Total W/L
44% (80-103)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Ken Onishi | William Ma |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 13 | 8 |
Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-3 7-5 |
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Ken Onishi | William Ma |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | N/A | N/A |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Ken Onishi Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q2 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 3-6 6-2 12-10 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 7-5 6-2 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Aristotelis Thanos
Player
Ken Onishi
65%
(
44 of
68)
1st Serve %
68%
(
52 of
77)
1
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
1
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
33%
(
8 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
47%
(
32 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
41 of
77)
77
Total Points Won
68
|
6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
QF |
Ken Onishi
Player
Yurii Dzhavakian
80%
(
39 of
49)
1st Serve %
63%
(
29 of
46)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
1
64%
(
25 of
39)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
37%
(
18 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
22 of
46)
53
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-4 3-6 18-16 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H |
view more
William Ma Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF | 6-1 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-3 4-6 10-8 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Markus Eriksson
Player
William Ma
68%
(
40 of
59)
1st Serve %
58%
(
35 of
60)
4
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
2
85%
(
34 of
40)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
27 of
35)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
15 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
23 of
60)
67
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
David Quayle
Player
William Ma
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve %
66%
(
33 of
50)
2
Aces
3
-
Double Faults
-
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
32%
(
18 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
24 of
50)
62
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
William Ma
Player
Filipe Paredes
65%
(
22 of
34)
1st Serve %
62%
(
29 of
47)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
91%
(
20 of
22)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
6 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
54
Total Points Won
27
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Hillel Rousseau
Player
William Ma
83%
(
48 of
58)
1st Serve %
53%
(
31 of
58)
3
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
6
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve Won
84%
(
26 of
31)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
19 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
20 of
58)
59
Total Points Won
57
|
3-6 6-3 10-2 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
William Ma
Player
Adria Vallejo Ferrer
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve %
82%
(
31 of
38)
6
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
33%
(
16 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
55
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-2 7-5 | H2H |
view more