Prediction of Kim Clijsters vs Tatiana Panova Head-to-Head, At
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
K. Clijsters vs T. Panova

Kim Clijsters
 BEL
w
w
l
w
l
l
l
l
l
l
2
Win
2
Played
0
Win
42
Age
49
1.74m
Height
1.54m
Ret.
C. Rank
Ret.
1
Best Rank
22
42
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$13.0M
Career Money
$51.6K
Right-handed (two-handed backhand)
Plays
Right-handed (two-handed backhand)

Tatiana Panova
 RUS
l
l
w
l
w
l
l
l
l
l
2
Win
2
Played
0
Win
42
Age
49
1.74m
Height
1.54m
Ret.
C. Rank
Ret.
1
Best Rank
22
42
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$13.0M
Career Money
$51.6K
Right-handed (two-handed backhand)
Plays
Right-handed (two-handed backhand)
Head-to-head: Clijsters 2 - 0 Panova
They have played 5 sets in total, with Kim Clijsters winning 4 and Tatiana Panova winning 1. The last match between Kim Clijsters and Tatiana Panova was at the Tennis Masters Series - Rome, 13-05-2002, Round: R3, Surface: Clay, with Kim Clijsters getting the victory 6-3 6-7(6) 6-1.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins | 
|---|---|
| Clijsters | 2 | 
| Panova | 0 | 
Last 2 H2H Matches:
(R3) Tennis Masters Series - Rome(05-13-02)
Kim Clijsters
6
6
6
Tatiana Panova
3
7
1
(R3) Tennis Masters Series - Indian Wells, California(03-06-00)
Kim Clijsters
6
7
Tatiana Panova
3
6
K. Clijsters vs T. Panova H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $12,982,120 | Career Prize Money | $51,600 | 
| 79.38% (485-126) | Career Total W/L | 50.64% (277-270) | 
| 1 | Clay | 0 | 
| 1 | Hard | 0 | 
| 41 | Titles | 5 | 
| 2 | Total H2H Matches | 0 | 
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) | 
K. Clijsters vs T. Panova Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Kim Clijsters has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Tatiana Panova has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
 - Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Kim Clijsters, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Tatiana Panova has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
 - Under pressure analysis: Kim Clijsters has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Tatiana Panova has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
 - Performance overview: Over the last year Kim Clijsters has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Tatiana Panova winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
 - Best surface: Kim Clijsters has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 82% (W/L 86/19), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 75% (W/L 70/23). Tatiana Panova has their best career surface win % on N/A, winning 82% (W/L 2/1), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 47% (W/L 112/126).
 - Player level: In the last year, Kim Clijsters has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Tatiana Panova has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
 - Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Kim Clijsters winning 2 times and Tatiana Panova being victorious 0 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Kim Clijsters winning 4 and Tatiana Panova winning 1.
 - The last match between Kim Clijsters and Tatiana Panova was at the Tennis Masters Series - Rome, 13-05-2002, Round: R3, Surface: Clay, with Kim Clijsters getting the victory 6-3 6-7(6) 6-1.
 - Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
 - Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Kim Clijsters has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Tatiana Panova has played against players with an average rank of 0.
 - Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Kim Clijsters has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Tatiana Panova has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
 - Break point conversion: In recent form, Kim Clijsters has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Tatiana Panova has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
 
Kim Clijsters vs Tatiana Panova Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
K. Clijsters vs T. Panova H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches Won | 0 | 
| 4 | Sets Won | 1 | 
| 31 | Games Won | 20 | 
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 | 
| 100% (2/2) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/2) | 
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) | 
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) | 
| 0% (0/2) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) | 
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/2) | 
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Clijsters 0%, Panova 0%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Clijsters 0%, Panova 0%.
Break Points Saved %: Clijsters 0%, Panova 0%.
K. Clijsters Recent Matches Played
T. Panova Recent Matches Played

K. Clijsters vs T. Panova Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 79.38% (485/126) | YTD Win/Loss | 50.64% (277/270) | 
| 74.67% (1029/349) | Sets Win/Loss | 50.08% (640/638) | 
| 60.86% (7497/4821) | Games Win/Loss | 49.57% (5751/5851) | 
| 80.33% (245/60) | Hard Win/Loss | 47.06% (112/126) | 
| 75.27% (70/23) | Clay Win/Loss | 46.56% (61/70) | 
| 81.25% (117/27) | Indoor Hard W/L | 58.40% (73/52) | 
| 76.81% (53/16) | Grass Win/Loss | 58.00% (29/21) | 
| 0.08 | Aces Per Game | 0 | 
| 501 | Aces Total | 17 | 
| 0.15 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.03 | 
| 882 | Total Double Faults | 153 | 
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match | 
| 357.14 | Average Opponent Rank | 390.3 | 
| 64% (9181/14430) | 1st Serve % | 61% (903/1473) | 
| 68% (6145/9088) | 1st Serve Win % | 56% (508/903) | 
| 49% (2531/5218) | 2nd Serve Win % | 40% (223/563) | 
| 48% (981/2025) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (78/156) | 
| 48% (6733/13946) | Return Points Win % | 44% (649/1476) | 
| 80.49% (132/32) | Slam W/L | 44.93% (31/38) | 
| 75.50% (114/37) | Masters W/L | 42.50% (34/46) | 
| 87.50% (21/3) | Cups W/L | 77.78% (7/2) | 
| 80.15% (218/54) | Main Tour W/L | 47.49% (123/136) | 
| 0% (0/0) | Challenger W/L | 74.65% (53/18) | 
| 0% (0/0) | Futures W/L | 66.67% (2/1) | 
| 80% (479/597) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 51% (274/540) | 
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) | 
| 59% (57/96) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (50/101) | 
| 62% (105/169) | Deciding Set Win % | 53% (99/187) | 
| 92% (470/433) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 80% (268/214) | 
| 7% (470/32) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 20% (268/53) | 
| 37% (141/52) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 22% (279/62) | 
Other Tennis Predictions Today
05:00 PM 04/11/25
PredictionW1
2.24
W2
1.56
06:00 PM 04/11/25
PredictionW1
1.92
W2
1.77
07:30 PM 04/11/25
PredictionW1
1.44
W2
2.55
10:00 PM 04/11/25
PredictionW1
2.14
W2
1.615
04:00 PM 04/11/25
PredictionW1
1.09
W2
7.3
09:30 PM 04/11/25
PredictionW1
2.76
W2
1.38
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips
03 Nov 2025
Hina Inoue vs Renata Zarazua Prediction – WTA Austin 125 – 3rd November 2025 Best Bets
03 Nov 2025
Marin Cilic vs Benjamin Hassan Prediction – ATP Helsinki Challenger – 3rd November 2025 Best Bets
03 Nov 2025
Marin Cilic vs Benjamin Hassan Prediction – ATP Helsinki Challenger – 3rd November 2025 Best Bets
03 Nov 2025
Matteo Berrettini vs Quentin Halys Prediction – ATP Moselle Open – 3rd November 2025 Best Bets
03 Nov 2025
Valentin Royer vs Cameron Norrie Prediction – ATP Moselle Open – 3rd November 2025 Best Bets
03 Nov 2025
Reilly Opelka vs Vit Kopriva Prediction – ATP Hellenic Championship – 3rd November 2025 Best Bets
Top Predictions Today
18:30
H2H 8-3
H2H 5-6
17:00
H2H 3-3
17:00
H2H 3-3
Tennis Events This Week
Hellenic Championship - Athens
Greece
Moselle Open - Metz
France
Helsinki Challenger
Finland
Knoxville Challenger
United States
Lima 3 Challenger
Peru
Matsuyama Challenger
Japan
Taipei Challenger
Chinese Taipei
M15 Antalya
Turkey
M15 Heraklion
Greece
M15 Manama
Bahrain
M15 Orlando
United States
M15 San Gregorio di Catania
Italy
M15 Valledupar
Colombia
M25 Monastir
Tunisia
M25 Montreal
Canada
M25 Valencia
Spain