Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Kimmer Coppejans vs Daniil Glinka Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Coppejans vs Glinka analysis and find out who is favored!
Kimmer Coppejans vs Daniil Glinka Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Coppejans has won 46.53% of points on his second serve, while Glinka has won 52.98%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Coppejans, in recent form, has won 53.72% of his opponent's second serve points, while Glinka has won 51.01%. The same stats for first serve returns are 27.24% and 29.4% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Coppejans has saved 60.61% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Glinka has saved 69.83% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Coppejans has won 51.16% of matches played (W/L 22/ 21), with Glinka winning 61.25% (W/L 49/ 31) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Coppejans has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 292/ 190), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 25% (W/L 3/ 9). Glinka has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 55% (W/L 48/ 39), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 47% (W/L 26/ 29).
- Player level: In the last year, Coppejans has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 53.85% of matches (W/L 14/ 12), where as Glinka has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 65.08% of matches (W/L 41/ 22). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Coppejans winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Coppejans winning 2 and Glinka winning 0. The last match between Coppejans and Glinka was at the St. Tropez Challenger, 01-09-2021, First, Hard with Kimmer Coppejans getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:58:48.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Coppejans and Glinka have played a deciding set 0 times, with Coppejans winning 0 times and Glinka 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Coppejans winning 0, and Glinka 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Coppejans has played against opponents with an average rank of 243.21 while Glinka has played against players with an average rank of 165.06.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Coppejans has won 53% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Glinka has won 47% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Coppejans has converted 25% of breakpoint opportunities, and Glinka has converted 35.98% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Coppejans 1 - 0 Glinka
232
Rank
97
High
30
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
448
Rank
448
High
23
Age
Plays
L
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
Form
W
W
W
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
57% (418-314)
Career Total W/L
52% (156-144)
50% (2-2)
YTD W/L
53% (16-14)
$294,830
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Kimmer Coppejans | Daniil Glinka |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 6 |
| Aces (Total) | 4 | 4 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:58:48 | 0:58:48 |
| 1st Serve % | 67% (33/49) | 61% (33/54) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 76% (25/33) | 61% (20/33) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 69% (11/16) | 43% (9/21) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 57% (4/7) | 100% (1/1) |
| Return Points W% | 46% (25/54) | 27% (13/49) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-3 |
Stats 
Kimmer Coppejans
Player
Daniil Glinka
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve %
61%
(
33 of
54)
4
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
4
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
13 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
25 of
54)
61
Total Points Won
42
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Kimmer Coppejans | Daniil Glinka |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 50% (2/2) | 53% (16/14) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 40% (4/6) | 57% (40/30) |
| Games Win/Loss | 48% (45/48) | 53% (366/320) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 50% (2/2) | 33% (1/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 58% (15/11) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.37 | 0.52 |
| Aces Total | 17 | 174 |
| DFs per game | 0.22 | 0.22 |
| DFs Total | 10 | 75 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:54:12 | 1:43:42 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 250.5 | 176.8 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (174/286) | 62% (1289/2088) |
| 1st Serve W% | 72% (125/174) | 75% (970/1289) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 48% (54/112) | 52% (416/799) |
| BPs Won% Total | 23% (8/35) | 37% (78/213) |
| Return Pts W% | 36% (119/327) | 38% (860/2264) |
| Slam W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 50% (1/1) | 33% (3/6) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 62% (13/8) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (2/4) | 53% (16/30) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (1/2) | 20% (2/10) |
| Deciding Set W% | 100% (2/2) | 20% (2/10) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 68% (22/15) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 32% (22/7) |
| 1st set L, W | 50% (4/2) | 13% (8/1) |
Kimmer Coppejans Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 |
Stats
Andrea Vavassori
Player
Kimmer Coppejans
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve %
56%
(
29 of
52)
4
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
3
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
28%
(
14 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
62
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kimmer Coppejans
Player
Thiago Agustin Tirante
55%
(
65 of
119)
1st Serve %
68%
(
89 of
131)
4
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
5
77%
(
50 of
65)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
61 of
89)
50%
(
27 of
54)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
18 of
42)
19%
(
3 of
16)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
35%
(
42 of
119)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
52 of
131)
129
Total Points Won
121
|
6-7(1) 7-6(6) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Marat Sharipov (RUS)
Player
Kimmer Coppejans
60%
(
30 of
50)
1st Serve %
80%
(
36 of
45)
10
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
1
93%
(
28 of
30)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
6 of
9)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
9 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
15 of
45)
56
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kimmer Coppejans
Player
Lucas Poullain
63%
(
44 of
70)
1st Serve %
69%
(
66 of
96)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
77%
(
34 of
44)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
41 of
66)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
34%
(
24 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
44 of
96)
90
Total Points Won
76
|
3-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Liam Draxl
Player
Kimmer Coppejans
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve %
48%
(
30 of
62)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
31 of
62)
66
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jose Statham
Player
Kimmer Coppejans
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve %
50%
(
18 of
36)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
62%
(
18 of
29)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
13 of
18)
45%
(
5 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
43%
(
17 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
39
Total Points Won
37
|
4-6 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mackenzie Mcdonald
Player
Kimmer Coppejans
62%
(
48 of
77)
1st Serve %
52%
(
46 of
88)
6
Aces
11
2
Double Faults
3
79%
(
38 of
48)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
25%
(
4 of
16)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
30%
(
23 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
38 of
88)
92
Total Points Won
73
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kimmer Coppejans
Player
Aleksandar Kovacevic
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve %
54%
(
26 of
48)
12
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
3
86%
(
30 of
35)
1st Serve Won
96%
(
25 of
26)
79%
(
15 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
9 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
14 of
48)
59
Total Points Won
43
|
7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 1 |
Stats
Khumoun Sultanov
Player
Kimmer Coppejans
69%
(
79 of
115)
1st Serve %
67%
(
80 of
119)
10
Aces
18
1
Double Faults
2
71%
(
56 of
79)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
59 of
80)
50%
(
18 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
36%
(
41 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
41 of
119)
115
Total Points Won
119
|
7-6(8) 3-6 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Titouan Droguet
Player
Kimmer Coppejans
54%
(
38 of
70)
1st Serve %
50%
(
37 of
74)
14
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
28 of
37)
66%
(
21 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
29%
(
20 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
26 of
74)
76
Total Points Won
68
|
6-1 1-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Daniil Glinka Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Ryan Seggerman
Player
Daniil Glinka
81%
(
63 of
78)
1st Serve %
64%
(
55 of
86)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
6
68%
(
43 of
63)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
37 of
55)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
26 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
34 of
86)
86
Total Points Won
78
|
4-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Daniil Glinka
Player
Andres Delgadillo
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
63)
6
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
91%
(
21 of
23)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
16 of
40)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
17%
(
6 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
63)
62
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Juan Alejandro Hernandez
Player
Daniil Glinka
75%
(
59 of
79)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
63)
3
Aces
12
2
Double Faults
3
69%
(
41 of
59)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
31 of
40)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
30%
(
24 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
22 of
63)
77
Total Points Won
65
|
6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ryan Seggerman
Player
Daniil Glinka
53%
(
67 of
126)
1st Serve %
68%
(
81 of
119)
16
Aces
9
11
Double Faults
3
88%
(
59 of
67)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
62 of
81)
51%
(
30 of
59)
2nd Serve Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
0%
(
0 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
37 of
126)
Rtn Points Won
27%
(
32 of
119)
121
Total Points Won
124
|
6-7(3) 7-6(4) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Arthur Fery
Player
Daniil Glinka
70%
(
63 of
90)
1st Serve %
64%
(
58 of
90)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
70%
(
44 of
63)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
42 of
58)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
11%
(
2 of
18)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
8)
33%
(
30 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
34 of
90)
94
Total Points Won
86
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniil Glinka
Player
Yanis Ghazouani Durand
68%
(
15 of
22)
1st Serve %
54%
(
20 of
37)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
6
93%
(
14 of
15)
1st Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
86%
(
6 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
9%
(
2 of
22)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
44
Total Points Won
15
|
6-1 4-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Antoine Hoang
Player
Daniil Glinka
73%
(
55 of
75)
1st Serve %
60%
(
42 of
70)
5
Aces
8
4
Double Faults
2
75%
(
41 of
55)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
32 of
42)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
24 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
25 of
70)
76
Total Points Won
69
|
7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniil Glinka
Player
Aidan Mchugh
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve %
59%
(
33 of
56)
7
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
89%
(
32 of
36)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
23 of
33)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
23%
(
12 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
22 of
56)
63
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniil Glinka
Player
Yannik Steinegger
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve %
62%
(
40 of
65)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
5
90%
(
28 of
31)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
24%
(
12 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
28 of
65)
66
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniil Glinka
Player
Alexis Canter
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve %
64%
(
36 of
56)
7
Aces
8
4
Double Faults
2
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
13 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
21 of
56)
63
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Coppejans Vs Glinka Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
