Kimmer Coppejans vs Hynek Barton Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Regarding second serve performance over the last six months, Kimmer Coppejans has a slight edge, securing 45.31% of points compared to Hynek Barton's 43.57%.
• Have you considered their capability in return games? Kimmer Coppejans also surpasses Hynek Barton, winning 47.07% against 46.53% of their opponents' second serve points.
• First serve returns highlight an advantage for Kimmer Coppejans, with a success rate of 31.7%, while Hynek Barton stands at 27.25%.
• When under pressure, particularly during breakpoints, Coppejans saves 55.28%, slightly outperforming Barton who saves 54.31%.
• In the past year, Kimmer Coppejans has a higher match win rate at 70.33% compared to Hynek Barton's 64.56%.
• Analyzing surface preference, both players excel on hard courts, winning 70% of their matches. However, Barton's weakest performance is on indoor hard courts, while Coppejans struggles on grass.
• Considering match levels, Barton competes prominently in Challengers/ITF events, winning 63.24% of matches, slightly better than Coppejans' 60% success rate in similar events.
• How does their direct head-to-head competition fare? Kimmer Coppejans has won their only encounter, taking both sets played against Hynek Barton.
• Examining opponent quality over the past year, Coppejans has faced stiffer competition with an opponent average rank of 313.42, whereas Barton's opponents had an average rank of 375.62.
• If the match reaches a deciding set, Barton stands out with a 74% win rate in such sets over the last year, better than Coppejans' 59% win rate.

Editorial Prediction (October 11, 2025, UTC):

The upcoming match between Hynek Barton and Kimmer Coppejans presents an intriguing clash. Coppejans has a slight edge in recent second serve performance and excels in return games, particularly against Barton in first serve returns.

Though both players favor hard surfaces, Coppejans shows steadier results across various playing conditions, suggesting a more adaptable game. He also possesses a slight advantage under pressure, as illustrated by his superior breakpoint save percentage.

Their previous head-to-head encounters provide a clear view of Coppejans' dominance, having defeated Barton convincingly. This, along with his experience facing higher-ranked opponents, positions him favorably.

The deciding set performance could serve as Barton's saving grace; however, factoring in all statistical areas, Kimmer Coppejans appears to be the likely winner in this match.