Kristjan Tamm vs Matteo DE Vincentis Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Tamm vs Vincentis analysis and find out who is favored!
Kristjan Tamm vs Matteo DE Vincentis Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Tamm has won 45.26% of points on his second serve, while Vincentis has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Tamm, in recent form, has won 47.32% of his opponent's second serve points, while Vincentis has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 31.52% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Tamm has saved 68.29% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Vincentis has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Tamm has won 50% of matches played (W/L 14/ 14), with Vincentis winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Tamm has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 57% (W/L 94/ 70), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 37% (W/L 11/ 19). Vincentis has their best career surface win % on , winning % (W/L / ), and worse career win % on , winning % (W/L / ).
- Player level: In the last year, Tamm has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 51.85% of matches (W/L 14/ 13), where as Vincentis has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Tamm has played against opponents with an average rank of 153.14 while Vincentis has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Tamm has won 56% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Vincentis has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Tamm has converted 38.24% of breakpoint opportunities, and Vincentis has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Tamm 0 - 0 Vincentis
3
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
N/A
Rank
High
25
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
25
Age
L
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
Career Total W/L
YTD W/L
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
YTD Titles
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Kristjan Tamm | Matteo DE Vincentis |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 50% (8/8) | 1st Match |
Sets Win/Loss | 50% (19/19) | 1st Match |
Games Win/Loss | 50% (179/181) | 1st Match |
Hard Win/Loss | 50% (8/8) | 1st Match |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Aces pg | 0.57 | 1st Match |
Aces Total | 99 | 1st Match |
DFs per game | 0.31 | 1st Match |
DFs Total | 54 | 1st Match |
Avg Match Time | 1:52:18 | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 206.69 | 1st Match |
1st Serve % | 61% (737/1201) | 1st Match |
1st Serve W% | 71% (524/737) | 1st Match |
2nd Serve W% | 45% (210/464) | 1st Match |
BPs Won% Total | 38% (39/102) | 1st Match |
Return Pts W% | 37% (429/1146) | 1st Match |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Futures W/L | 50% (8/8) | 1st Match |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 53% (8/15) | 1st Match |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
TBs Win% (Total) | 40% (2/5) | 1st Match |
Deciding Set W% | 57% (4/7) | 1st Match |
1st set W, W | 88% (8/7) | 1st Match |
1st set W, L | 13% (8/1) | 1st Match |
1st set L, W | 13% (8/1) | 1st Match |
Kristjan Tamm Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF |
Joshua Sheehy
Player
Kristjan Tamm
59%
(
66 of
111)
1st Serve %
70%
(
73 of
104)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
65%
(
43 of
66)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
50 of
73)
64%
(
29 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
35%
(
39 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
40 of
104)
112
Total Points Won
103
|
6-3 3-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
R2 |
Kristjan Tamm
Player
Corban Crowther
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve %
54%
(
27 of
50)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
18 of
27)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
12 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
20 of
50)
57
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Kristjan Tamm
Player
Egor Agafonov
67%
(
62 of
92)
1st Serve %
59%
(
51 of
86)
1
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
65%
(
40 of
62)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
31 of
51)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
14 of
35)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
37%
(
34 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
41 of
86)
99
Total Points Won
79
|
6-3 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Moerani Bouzige
Player
Kristjan Tamm
67%
(
46 of
69)
1st Serve %
61%
(
46 of
76)
7
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
32 of
46)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
32%
(
22 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
32 of
76)
79
Total Points Won
66
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Kristjan Tamm
Player
Filip Peliwo
58%
(
49 of
84)
1st Serve %
54%
(
45 of
84)
7
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
0
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
29%
(
10 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
46%
(
39 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
36 of
84)
81
Total Points Won
87
|
6-2 1-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Kristjan Tamm
Player
Ye Hongyu
57%
(
26 of
46)
1st Serve %
70%
(
42 of
60)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
6
92%
(
24 of
26)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
10 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
25 of
60)
61
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Tauheed Browning
Player
Kristjan Tamm
58%
(
49 of
85)
1st Serve %
63%
(
48 of
76)
4
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
1
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
35 of
48)
58%
(
21 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
34%
(
29 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
31 of
76)
87
Total Points Won
74
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Mees Rottgering
Player
Kristjan Tamm
100%
(
4 of
4)
1st Serve %
64%
(
9 of
14)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
1
100%
(
4 of
4)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
0%
(
0 of
0)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
0%
(
0 of
4)
Rtn Points Won
71%
(
10 of
14)
14
Total Points Won
4
|
3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
R2 |
Kristjan Tamm
Player
Illya Beloborodko
58%
(
64 of
111)
1st Serve %
57%
(
47 of
82)
2
Aces
9
6
Double Faults
6
72%
(
46 of
64)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
35 of
47)
51%
(
24 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
37%
(
41 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
28 of
82)
98
Total Points Won
95
|
3-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Kristjan Tamm
Player
Milan Drinic
56%
(
76 of
136)
1st Serve %
69%
(
100 of
144)
24
Aces
8
8
Double Faults
3
80%
(
61 of
76)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
67 of
100)
38%
(
23 of
60)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
17 of
44)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
38%
(
52 of
136)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
60 of
144)
144
Total Points Won
136
|
7-6(5) 6-7(4) 6-4 | H2H |
view more
Matteo DE Vincentis Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Matteo De Vincentis
63%
(
46 of
73)
1st Serve %
61%
(
43 of
71)
1
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
3
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
45%
(
33 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
34 of
71)
74
Total Points Won
70
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Matteo De Vincentis
Player
Valentin Lapalu
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve %
53%
(
25 of
47)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
67%
(
6 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
21%
(
7 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
30 of
47)
56
Total Points Won
24
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
QF |
Matteo De Vincentis
Player
Sergi Fita Juan
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve %
64%
(
23 of
36)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
14 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
54
Total Points Won
27
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 3-0 ret. | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Gian Marco Moroni
Player
Matteo De Vincentis
77%
(
51 of
66)
1st Serve %
74%
(
68 of
92)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
1
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
37 of
68)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
21 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
43 of
92)
88
Total Points Won
70
|
6-2 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
QF |
Matteo De Vincentis
Player
Igor Trunov
77%
(
51 of
66)
1st Serve %
55%
(
42 of
76)
1
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
8
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
30 of
42)
40%
(
6 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
11 of
34)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
38%
(
25 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
35 of
76)
76
Total Points Won
66
|
5-7 6-4 10-5 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-4 6-0 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-2 5-7 10-4 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Maxence Bertimon
Player
Matteo De Vincentis
63%
(
39 of
62)
1st Serve %
69%
(
56 of
81)
6
Aces
2
-
Double Faults
-
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
42 of
81)
82
Total Points Won
61
|
6-3 3-6 6-0 | H2H |
view more