Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Kyle Kang vs Giacomo Revelli Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Kang vs Revelli analysis and find out who is favored!
Kyle Kang vs Giacomo Revelli Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Kang has won 49.61% of points on his second serve, while Revelli has won 41.43%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Kang, in recent form, has won 53.36% of his opponent's second serve points, while Revelli has won 47.62%. The same stats for first serve returns are 33.57% and 30.92% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Kang has saved 64.86% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Revelli has saved 41.18% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Kang has won 52.17% of matches played (W/L 12/ 11), with Revelli winning 58.54% (W/L 24/ 17) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Kang has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 62% (W/L 21/ 13), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 5). Revelli has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 68% (W/L 45/ 21), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 47% (W/L 21/ 24).
- Player level: In the last year, Kang has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 68.75% of matches (W/L 11/ 5), where as Revelli has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 58.54% of matches (W/L 24/ 17). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Kang winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Kang winning 2 and Revelli winning 0. The last match between Kang and Revelli was at the M25 Calabasas, 27-10-2021, First, Hard with Kyle Kang getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:36:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Kang and Revelli have played a deciding set 0 times, with Kang winning 0 times and Revelli 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Kang winning 0, and Revelli 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Kang has played against opponents with an average rank of 227.78 while Revelli has played against players with an average rank of 27.17.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Kang has won 33% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Revelli has won 40% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Kang has converted 40.28% of breakpoint opportunities, and Revelli has converted 53.85% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Kang 1 - 0 Revelli
772
Rank
591
High
19
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
22
Age
Plays
W
W
W
L
L
L
L
W
W
L
Form
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
52% (43-40)
Career Total W/L
59% (66-45)
40% (2-3)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Kyle Kang | Giacomo Revelli |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 13 | 9 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 1 | 6 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:36:0 | 1:36:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 53% (30/57) | 57% (45/79) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 77% (23/30) | 71% (32/45) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 78% (21/27) | 47% (16/34) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 33% (2/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 39% (31/79) | 23% (13/57) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 7-5 |
Stats 
Kyle Kang
Player
Giacomo Revelli
53%
(
30 of
57)
1st Serve %
57%
(
45 of
79)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
32 of
45)
78%
(
21 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
13 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
31 of
79)
75
Total Points Won
61
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Kyle Kang | Giacomo Revelli |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 40% (2/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 45% (5/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 50% (50/50) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 40% (2/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.22 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 11 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.14 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 7 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:32:42 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 217 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 60% (191/320) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 66% (126/191) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 47% (61/129) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 46% (16/35) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 40% (124/312) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 67% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 40% (2/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 67% (3/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 33% (3/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Kyle Kang Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Charles Broom
Player
Kyle Kang
70%
(
62 of
88)
1st Serve %
53%
(
39 of
74)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
60%
(
37 of
62)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
38%
(
10 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
12 of
35)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
47%
(
41 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
36 of
74)
83
Total Points Won
79
|
1-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kyle Kang
Player
Ethan Quinn
58%
(
42 of
73)
1st Serve %
55%
(
33 of
60)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
6
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
25 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
24 of
60)
72
Total Points Won
61
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kyle Kang
Player
Axel Nefve
68%
(
39 of
57)
1st Serve %
52%
(
24 of
46)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
16 of
24)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
5 of
22)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
37%
(
21 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
61
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Matias Soto
Player
Kyle Kang
70%
(
47 of
67)
1st Serve %
71%
(
48 of
68)
2
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
2
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
30 of
48)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
31%
(
21 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
68)
77
Total Points Won
58
|
7-6(6) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Noah Rubin
Player
Kyle Kang
76%
(
39 of
51)
1st Serve %
48%
(
23 of
48)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
0
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
13 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
20 of
48)
58
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sebastian Fanselow
Player
Kyle Kang
60%
(
34 of
57)
1st Serve %
59%
(
43 of
73)
3
Aces
10
4
Double Faults
4
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
19 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
73)
72
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
August Holmgren
Player
Kyle Kang
74%
(
52 of
70)
1st Serve %
59%
(
40 of
68)
12
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
79%
(
41 of
52)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
29%
(
20 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
25 of
68)
75
Total Points Won
63
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kyle Kang
Player
Karue Sell
60%
(
52 of
86)
1st Serve %
60%
(
59 of
99)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
34 of
59)
53%
(
18 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
37%
(
32 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
46 of
99)
100
Total Points Won
85
|
7-6(3) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kyle Kang
Player
Ozan Baris
77%
(
56 of
73)
1st Serve %
69%
(
42 of
61)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
30 of
42)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
37%
(
27 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
25 of
61)
71
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kyle Kang
Player
Alessio Vasquez Gehrke
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve %
70%
(
37 of
53)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
7
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
16 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
29 of
53)
61
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Giacomo Revelli Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF | 7-6(7) 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Evgeny Philippov
Player
Giacomo Revelli
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve %
75%
(
43 of
57)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
85%
(
22 of
26)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
77%
(
10 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
7 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
28 of
57)
60
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Giacomo Revelli
Player
Dominic Ducariu
74%
(
50 of
68)
1st Serve %
68%
(
41 of
60)
6
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
38%
(
26 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
31 of
60)
73
Total Points Won
55
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-0 4-0 ret. | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Filippo Speziali
Player
Giacomo Revelli
67%
(
48 of
72)
1st Serve %
75%
(
48 of
64)
3
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
0
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
37 of
48)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
35%
(
25 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
23 of
64)
70
Total Points Won
66
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Giacomo Revelli
Player
Vardan Manukyan
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve %
57%
(
37 of
65)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
26 of
37)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
32%
(
19 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
24 of
65)
64
Total Points Won
60
|
4-6 6-2 11-9 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 7-5 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 3-6 13-11 | H2H | |||
view more
Kang Vs Revelli Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
