Kyle Seelig vs Anthony Pero Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Seelig vs Pero analysis and find out who is favored!
Kyle Seelig vs Anthony Pero Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Seelig has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Pero has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Seelig, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Pero has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Seelig has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Pero has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Seelig has won 50% of matches played (W/L 4/ 4), with Pero winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Seelig has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 66% (W/L 40/ 21), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 50% (W/L 13/ 13). Pero has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 38% (W/L 3/ 5), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 6).
- Player level: In the last year, Seelig has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 66.67% of matches (W/L 2/ 1), where as Pero has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Seelig winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Seelig winning 2 and Pero winning 0. The last match between Seelig and Pero was at the M15 East Lansing, 21-11-2019, First, I.hard with Kyle Seelig getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Seelig and Pero have played a deciding set 0 times, with Seelig winning 0 times and Pero 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Seelig winning 0, and Pero 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Seelig has played against opponents with an average rank of 161.75 while Pero has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Seelig has won 100% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Pero has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Seelig has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Pero has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Seelig 1 - 0 Pero
2
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
2
Minor
886
Rank
349
High
26
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
24
Age
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
64% (143-81)
Career Total W/L
18% (3-14)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$4,125
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Kyle Seelig | Anthony Pero |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 12 | 2 |
Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-1 6-1 |
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Kyle Seelig | Anthony Pero |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | N/A | N/A |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Kyle Seelig Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 |
Evan Burnett
Player
Kyle Seelig
59%
(
46 of
78)
1st Serve %
69%
(
54 of
78)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
0
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
28 of
54)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
38%
(
30 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
38 of
78)
86
Total Points Won
70
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Alejandro Tabilo
Player
Kyle Seelig
56%
(
32 of
57)
1st Serve %
64%
(
43 of
67)
5
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
0
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
68%
(
17 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
15 of
24)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
28%
(
16 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
67)
71
Total Points Won
53
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Kyle Seelig
Player
John-Patrick Smith
67%
(
46 of
69)
1st Serve %
71%
(
48 of
68)
3
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
24 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
32 of
68)
77
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(1) 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Shintaro Mochizuki
Player
Kyle Seelig
54%
(
34 of
63)
1st Serve %
60%
(
32 of
53)
3
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
2
56%
(
19 of
34)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
43%
(
27 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
29 of
53)
65
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Kyle Seelig
Player
Benjamin Kittay
71%
(
47 of
66)
1st Serve %
51%
(
36 of
71)
3
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
6
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
84%
(
16 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
17 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
28 of
71)
77
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
QF |
Darian King
Player
Kyle Seelig
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve %
63%
(
30 of
48)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
12 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
59
Total Points Won
31
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Kyle Seelig
Player
A.j. Catanzariti
70%
(
80 of
114)
1st Serve %
75%
(
92 of
123)
6
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
0
66%
(
53 of
80)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
57 of
92)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
39%
(
44 of
114)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
52 of
123)
122
Total Points Won
115
|
7-6(3) 6-7(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Kyle Seelig
Player
Leo Vithoontien
61%
(
28 of
46)
1st Serve %
63%
(
26 of
41)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
1
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
38%
(
17 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
18 of
41)
46
Total Points Won
40
|
6-4 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Jacopo Berrettini
Player
Kyle Seelig
57%
(
46 of
81)
1st Serve %
73%
(
83 of
113)
9
Aces
3
7
Double Faults
4
83%
(
38 of
46)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
53 of
83)
54%
(
19 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
21%
(
3 of
14)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
30%
(
24 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
47 of
113)
104
Total Points Won
90
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
SF |
Adam Walton
Player
Kyle Seelig
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve %
75%
(
45 of
60)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
40%
(
6 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
35%
(
17 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
32 of
60)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H |
view more
Anthony Pero Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Mitchell Harper
Player
Anthony Pero
58%
(
36 of
62)
1st Serve %
58%
(
38 of
66)
6
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
66)
72
Total Points Won
56
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Noah Schachter
Player
Anthony Pero
48%
(
27 of
56)
1st Serve %
69%
(
36 of
52)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
63%
(
17 of
27)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
41%
(
12 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
48%
(
27 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
32 of
52)
61
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 5-7 6-4 6-0 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 4-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-4 7-5 | H2H | |||
QF | 6-0 6-2 | H2H |
view more