Kyle Seelig vs Mohamed Safwat Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Seelig vs Safwat analysis and find out who is favored!
Kyle Seelig vs Mohamed Safwat Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Seelig has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Safwat has won 55.19%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Seelig, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Safwat has won 50.81%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 31.41% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Seelig has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Safwat has saved 65.58% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Seelig has won 50% of matches played (W/L 4/ 4), with Safwat winning 67.95% (W/L 53/ 25) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Seelig has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 66% (W/L 40/ 21), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 50% (W/L 13/ 13). Safwat has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 65% (W/L 282/ 155), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 40% (W/L 24/ 36).
- Player level: In the last year, Seelig has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 66.67% of matches (W/L 2/ 1), where as Safwat has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 74.14% of matches (W/L 43/ 15). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Seelig winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Seelig winning 2 and Safwat winning 1. The last match between Seelig and Safwat was at the Mexico City Challenger, 03-04-2022, Q1 round, Clay with Kyle Seelig getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:41:21.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Seelig and Safwat have played a deciding set 1 times, with Seelig winning 1 times and Safwat 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Seelig winning 0, and Safwat 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Seelig has played against opponents with an average rank of 161.75 while Safwat has played against players with an average rank of 201.72.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Seelig has won 100% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Safwat has won 65% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Seelig has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Safwat has converted 40.2% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Seelig 1 - 0 Safwat
2
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
2
Minor
886
Rank
349
High
26
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
357
Rank
130
High
33
Age
R
Plays
30
Total
0
Mast
1
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
29
Minor
Form
64% (143-81)
Career Total W/L
59% (594-409)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
67% (14-7)
$4,125
Career Prize Money
$262,205
0
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Kyle Seelig | Mohamed Safwat |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
Games Won | 15 | 11 |
Aces (Total) | 1 | 12 |
DFs (Total) | 2 | 13 |
Avg Match Time | 1:41:21 | 1:41:21 |
1st Serve % | 71% (60/85) | 61% (51/83) |
1st Serve Win% | 67% (40/60) | 78% (40/51) |
2nd Serve Win% | 52% (13/25) | 25% (8/32) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 57% (4/7) | 40% (2/5) |
Return Points W% | 42% (35/83) | 38% (32/85) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3-6 6-3 6-2 |
Kyle Seelig
Player
Mohamed Safwat
71%
(
60 of
85)
1st Serve %
61%
(
51 of
83)
1
Aces
12
2
Double Faults
13
67%
(
40 of
60)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
40 of
51)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
8 of
32)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
32 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
35 of
83)
88
Total Points Won
80
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Kyle Seelig | Mohamed Safwat |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 67% (14/7) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 64% (30/17) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 55% (251/207) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 77% (10/3) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 57% (4/3) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0.37 |
Aces Total | 0 | 84 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0.2 |
DFs Total | 0 | 45 |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:40:41 |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 140.86 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 57% (742/1297) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 72% (534/742) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 56% (310/555) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 41% (62/152) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 40% (562/1403) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 43% (3/4) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 77% (10/3) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 67% (14/21) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 45% (5/11) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 60% (3/5) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 92% (13/12) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 8% (13/1) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 25% (8/2) |
Kyle Seelig Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 |
Evan Burnett
Player
Kyle Seelig
59%
(
46 of
78)
1st Serve %
69%
(
54 of
78)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
0
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
28 of
54)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
38%
(
30 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
38 of
78)
86
Total Points Won
70
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Alejandro Tabilo
Player
Kyle Seelig
56%
(
32 of
57)
1st Serve %
64%
(
43 of
67)
5
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
0
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
68%
(
17 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
15 of
24)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
28%
(
16 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
67)
71
Total Points Won
53
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Kyle Seelig
Player
John-Patrick Smith
67%
(
46 of
69)
1st Serve %
71%
(
48 of
68)
3
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
24 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
32 of
68)
77
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(1) 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Shintaro Mochizuki
Player
Kyle Seelig
54%
(
34 of
63)
1st Serve %
60%
(
32 of
53)
3
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
2
56%
(
19 of
34)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
43%
(
27 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
29 of
53)
65
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Kyle Seelig
Player
Benjamin Kittay
71%
(
47 of
66)
1st Serve %
51%
(
36 of
71)
3
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
6
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
84%
(
16 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
17 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
28 of
71)
77
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
QF |
Darian King
Player
Kyle Seelig
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve %
63%
(
30 of
48)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
12 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
59
Total Points Won
31
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Kyle Seelig
Player
A.j. Catanzariti
70%
(
80 of
114)
1st Serve %
75%
(
92 of
123)
6
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
0
66%
(
53 of
80)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
57 of
92)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
39%
(
44 of
114)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
52 of
123)
122
Total Points Won
115
|
7-6(3) 6-7(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Kyle Seelig
Player
Leo Vithoontien
61%
(
28 of
46)
1st Serve %
63%
(
26 of
41)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
1
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
38%
(
17 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
18 of
41)
46
Total Points Won
40
|
6-4 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Jacopo Berrettini
Player
Kyle Seelig
57%
(
46 of
81)
1st Serve %
73%
(
83 of
113)
9
Aces
3
7
Double Faults
4
83%
(
38 of
46)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
53 of
83)
54%
(
19 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
21%
(
3 of
14)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
30%
(
24 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
47 of
113)
104
Total Points Won
90
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
SF |
Adam Walton
Player
Kyle Seelig
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve %
75%
(
45 of
60)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
40%
(
6 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
35%
(
17 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
32 of
60)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H |
view more
Mohamed Safwat Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
F |
Mohamed Safwat
Player
Robin Bertrand
65%
(
51 of
79)
1st Serve %
64%
(
47 of
74)
4
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
7
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
34 of
47)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
38%
(
30 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
30 of
74)
79
Total Points Won
74
|
3-6 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
SF |
Mohamed Safwat
Player
Vadym Ursu
60%
(
38 of
63)
1st Serve %
51%
(
29 of
57)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
6
58%
(
22 of
38)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
7 of
28)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
41%
(
26 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
32 of
57)
69
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Mohamed Safwat
Player
Matthew Hulme
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve %
77%
(
43 of
56)
5
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
3
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
25%
(
15 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
56)
69
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Mohamed Safwat
Player
Maxim Mrva
54%
(
22 of
41)
1st Serve %
41%
(
24 of
58)
4
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
82%
(
18 of
22)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
16 of
24)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
11 of
34)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
32%
(
13 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
58)
59
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Mohamed Safwat
Player
Yousef Khamis
58%
(
32 of
55)
1st Serve %
67%
(
51 of
76)
6
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
94%
(
30 of
32)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
37 of
51)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
22%
(
12 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
29 of
76)
72
Total Points Won
59
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Illya Beloborodko
Player
Mohamed Safwat
57%
(
51 of
89)
1st Serve %
57%
(
60 of
106)
7
Aces
9
8
Double Faults
6
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
41 of
60)
55%
(
21 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
4 of
4)
36%
(
32 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
42 of
106)
99
Total Points Won
96
|
6-4 3-6 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Mohamed Safwat
Player
Mees Rottgering
58%
(
33 of
57)
1st Serve %
68%
(
48 of
71)
7
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
31 of
48)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
17 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
30 of
71)
70
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Marco Trungelliti
Player
Mohamed Safwat
60%
(
39 of
65)
1st Serve %
52%
(
37 of
71)
1
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
4
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
27 of
37)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
11 of
34)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
40%
(
26 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
71)
72
Total Points Won
64
|
1-6 6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Mohamed Safwat
Player
Juan Pablo Paz
50%
(
30 of
60)
1st Serve %
67%
(
50 of
75)
3
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
36 of
50)
70%
(
21 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
14 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
29 of
75)
75
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Mohamed Safwat
Player
Max Houkes
58%
(
32 of
55)
1st Serve %
69%
(
36 of
52)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
10 of
16)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
27%
(
15 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
20 of
52)
60
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H |
view more