Kyle Seelig vs Tim Heger Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Seelig vs Heger analysis and find out who is favored!
Kyle Seelig vs Tim Heger Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Seelig has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Heger has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Seelig, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Heger has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Seelig has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Heger has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Seelig has won 50% of matches played (W/L 4/ 4), with Heger winning 54.55% (W/L 18/ 15) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Seelig has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 66% (W/L 40/ 21), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 50% (W/L 13/ 13). Heger has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 55% (W/L 28/ 23), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 33% (W/L 3/ 6).
- Player level: In the last year, Seelig has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 66.67% of matches (W/L 2/ 1), where as Heger has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 54.55% of matches (W/L 18/ 15). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Seelig winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Seelig winning 2 and Heger winning 1. The last match between Seelig and Heger was at the M15 Heraklion, 04-11-2021, Second, Hard with Kyle Seelig getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 3:15:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Seelig and Heger have played a deciding set 1 times, with Seelig winning 1 times and Heger 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Seelig winning 0, and Heger 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Seelig has played against opponents with an average rank of 161.75 while Heger has played against players with an average rank of 94.39.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Seelig has won 100% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Heger has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Seelig has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Heger has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Seelig 1 - 0 Heger
2
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
2
Minor
886
Rank
349
High
26
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
24
Age
R
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
64% (143-81)
Career Total W/L
50% (110-112)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$4,125
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Kyle Seelig | Tim Heger |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
Games Won | 17 | 15 |
Aces (Total) | 2 | 18 |
DFs (Total) | 0 | 6 |
Avg Match Time | 3:15:0 | 3:15:0 |
1st Serve % | 71% (75/105) | 68% (75/111) |
1st Serve Win% | 67% (50/75) | 72% (54/75) |
2nd Serve Win% | 70% (21/30) | 42% (15/36) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 38% (3/8) | 40% (2/5) |
Return Points W% | 38% (42/111) | 32% (34/105) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
4-6 6-4 7-5 |
Kyle Seelig
Player
Tim Heger
71%
(
75 of
105)
1st Serve %
68%
(
75 of
111)
2
Aces
18
0
Double Faults
6
67%
(
50 of
75)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
54 of
75)
70%
(
21 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
32%
(
34 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
42 of
111)
113
Total Points Won
103
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Kyle Seelig | Tim Heger |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | N/A | N/A |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Kyle Seelig Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 |
Evan Burnett
Player
Kyle Seelig
59%
(
46 of
78)
1st Serve %
69%
(
54 of
78)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
0
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
28 of
54)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
38%
(
30 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
38 of
78)
86
Total Points Won
70
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Alejandro Tabilo
Player
Kyle Seelig
56%
(
32 of
57)
1st Serve %
64%
(
43 of
67)
5
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
0
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
68%
(
17 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
15 of
24)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
28%
(
16 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
67)
71
Total Points Won
53
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Kyle Seelig
Player
John-Patrick Smith
67%
(
46 of
69)
1st Serve %
71%
(
48 of
68)
3
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
24 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
32 of
68)
77
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(1) 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Shintaro Mochizuki
Player
Kyle Seelig
54%
(
34 of
63)
1st Serve %
60%
(
32 of
53)
3
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
2
56%
(
19 of
34)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
43%
(
27 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
29 of
53)
65
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Kyle Seelig
Player
Benjamin Kittay
71%
(
47 of
66)
1st Serve %
51%
(
36 of
71)
3
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
6
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
84%
(
16 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
17 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
28 of
71)
77
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
QF |
Darian King
Player
Kyle Seelig
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve %
63%
(
30 of
48)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
12 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
59
Total Points Won
31
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Kyle Seelig
Player
A.j. Catanzariti
70%
(
80 of
114)
1st Serve %
75%
(
92 of
123)
6
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
0
66%
(
53 of
80)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
57 of
92)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
39%
(
44 of
114)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
52 of
123)
122
Total Points Won
115
|
7-6(3) 6-7(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Kyle Seelig
Player
Leo Vithoontien
61%
(
28 of
46)
1st Serve %
63%
(
26 of
41)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
1
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
38%
(
17 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
18 of
41)
46
Total Points Won
40
|
6-4 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Jacopo Berrettini
Player
Kyle Seelig
57%
(
46 of
81)
1st Serve %
73%
(
83 of
113)
9
Aces
3
7
Double Faults
4
83%
(
38 of
46)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
53 of
83)
54%
(
19 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
21%
(
3 of
14)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
30%
(
24 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
47 of
113)
104
Total Points Won
90
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
SF |
Adam Walton
Player
Kyle Seelig
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve %
75%
(
45 of
60)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
40%
(
6 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
35%
(
17 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
32 of
60)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H |
view more
Tim Heger Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | 6-1 7-6(5) | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
QF |
Dax Donders
Player
Tim Heger
63%
(
34 of
54)
1st Serve %
57%
(
27 of
47)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
6
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
4 of
20)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
39%
(
21 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
31 of
47)
64
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
R2 |
Mathys Erhard
Player
Tim Heger
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve %
69%
(
51 of
74)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
7
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
42%
(
22 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
40 of
74)
70
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Tim Heger
Player
Nikita Mashtakov
74%
(
75 of
101)
1st Serve %
76%
(
68 of
90)
4
Aces
0
14
Double Faults
5
71%
(
53 of
75)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
33 of
68)
12%
(
3 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
45%
(
45 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
48 of
90)
104
Total Points Won
87
|
4-6 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Tim Heger
Player
Enrico Giacomini
63%
(
32 of
51)
1st Serve %
68%
(
39 of
57)
-
Aces
-
7
Double Faults
1
66%
(
21 of
32)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
20 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
64
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
Tim Heger
Player
Lukas Rohseano
60%
(
27 of
45)
1st Serve %
60%
(
33 of
55)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
0
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
14 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
60
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Matvey Minin
Player
Tim Heger
61%
(
35 of
57)
1st Serve %
70%
(
51 of
73)
0
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
8
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
5 of
22)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
37%
(
21 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
38 of
73)
74
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Tim Heger
Player
Carlo Angeli
59%
(
41 of
70)
1st Serve %
55%
(
38 of
69)
8
Aces
1
13
Double Faults
6
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
28%
(
8 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
43%
(
30 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
38 of
69)
78
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H |
view more