Lanlana Tararudee vs Anna-Lena Friedsam Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan
Published on 19 Jul at 01:00 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
L. Tararudee vs A. Friedsam

THA
1
Win
Played
0
Win

GER
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Tararudee 1 - 0 Friedsam
They have played 2 sets in total, with Lanlana Tararudee winning 2 and Anna-Lena Friedsam winning 0. The last match between Lanlana Tararudee and Anna-Lena Friedsam was at the Eupago Porto Open - Porto, 19-07-2025, Round: SF, Surface: Hard, with Lanlana Tararudee getting the victory 6-3 6-3.
Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Tararudee | 1 |
Friedsam | 0 |
Last H2H Matches:
(SF) Eupago Porto Open - Porto(07-19-25)
L. Tararudee vs A. Friedsam H2H Profile
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
$57,835 | Career Prize Money | $1,078,782 |
63.48% (146-84) | Career Total W/L | 60.18% (396-262) |
1 | Hard | 0 |
6 | Titles | 15 |
1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
50.00% (2-2) | YTD Win/Loss | 0.00% (0-1) |
L. Tararudee vs A. Friedsam Match Preview:
- Can strong second serve performances tip the balance in matches? Friedsam holds a slight edge, winning 41.47% of recent points on their second serve compared to Tararudee's 38.63%.
- Who's more effective returning serves? Tararudee narrowly leads in winning opponent's second serve points at 48.96%, whereas Friedsam follows closely at 47.83%.
- In terms of returning first serves, Tararudee again slightly surpasses Friedsam, securing 31.01% of points compared to Friedsam's 30.29%.
- Who excels under pressure? Notably, Friedsam saves 54.83% of breakpoints, overshadowing Tararudee’s 41.41%.
- How does overall match success rate compare? Friedsam has a higher match win rate of 72.22%, surpassing Tararudee's 58.06% in the last year.
- Surface preferences reveal strengths: Tararudee excels on grass (67%), while Friedsam shines on indoor hard courts (67%).
- How does tournament level experience vary? Friedsam outperforms by winning 76.19% of matches in Challenger/ITF tournaments > $10K, compared to Tararudee’s 63.27%.
- Is opponent quality a factor? Friedsam faces slightly better-ranked competition, with an average opponent rank of 282.19 compared to Tararudee's 307.15.
- Deciding set capabilities favor Friedsam, who wins 70% of deciding sets, versus Tararudee’s 38% success rate.
- Does break point conversion affect outcomes? Tararudee has converted 41.78% of break points, outperforming Friedsam's 33.2% efficiency.
Editorial Prediction (July 19, 2025, UTC):
Both players exhibit unique strengths coming into the match. Friedsam demonstrates a superior ability under pressure, saving more breakpoints and thriving in deciding sets, which could be instrumental during tight match situations.
Tararudee’s slight edge in break point conversion may prove beneficial, yet Friedsam’s overall higher win percentage and resilience in high-stake moments position them favorably.
Considering Friedsam’s consistent performance against slightly better-ranked opponents, their experience and success on indoor hard courts provide an additional advantage.
Assessing these factors, Anna-Lena Friedsam emerges as the more likely victor in this match-up, based on current form and past performance data.
Lanlana Tararudee vs Anna-Lena Friedsam Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
L. Tararudee vs A. Friedsam H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
2 | Sets Won | 0 |
12 | Games Won | 6 |
2 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
0 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
1:18:46 | Average Match Time | 1:18:46 |
50% (25/50) | 1st Serve % | 76% (45/59) |
80% (20/25) | 1st Serve Win % | 49% (22/45) |
72% (18/25) | 2nd Serve Win % | 64% (9/14) |
40% (4/10) | Break Pts Won % | 33% (1/3) |
47% (28/59) | Return Points Win % | 24% (12/50) |
100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
L. Tararudee Recent Matches Played
A. Friedsam Recent Matches Played

L. Tararudee vs A. Friedsam Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
63.48% (146/84) | YTD Win/Loss | 60.18% (396/262) |
61.30% (320/202) | Sets Win/Loss | 58.17% (890/640) |
54.68% (2565/2126) | Games Win/Loss | 53.56% (7611/6600) |
64.36% (121/67) | Hard Win/Loss | 56.08% (106/83) |
61.29% (19/12) | Clay Win/Loss | 59.66% (139/94) |
0.00% (0/2) | Indoor Hard W/L | 67.16% (135/66) |
66.67% (6/3) | Grass Win/Loss | 45.71% (16/19) |
0.26 | Aces Per Game | 0.22 |
602 | Aces Total | 1548 |
0.3 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.24 |
686 | Total Double Faults | 1677 |
1:34:26 | Average Match Time | 1:11:27 |
409.04 | Average Opponent Rank | 458.66 |
57% (8186/14297) | 1st Serve % | 65% (22175/34145) |
65% (5334/8186) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (14469/22175) |
46% (2808/6111) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (5510/11968) |
49% (910/1870) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (1692/3728) |
47% (6692/14334) | Return Points Win % | 43% (14424/33785) |
27.27% (3/8) | Slam W/L | 36.84% (21/36) |
50.00% (1/1) | Masters W/L | 33.33% (10/20) |
50.00% (2/2) | Cups W/L | 40.00% (2/3) |
20.00% (1/4) | Main Tour W/L | 52.88% (101/90) |
65.38% (119/63) | Challenger W/L | 68.30% (209/97) |
76.92% (20/6) | Futures W/L | 76.81% (53/16) |
63% (141/223) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 60% (387/644) |
33% (1/3) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
60% (25/42) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 52% (90/174) |
52% (33/63) | Deciding Set Win % | 54% (121/224) |
88% (148/130) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (390/334) |
12% (148/18) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (390/55) |
20% (82/16) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 23% (268/61) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips

Prediction Of Buyunchaokete Vs Zhizhen H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?

Prediction Of Basavareddy Vs Cilic H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?

Prediction Of Berrettini Vs Svrcina H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?
