Learner Tien vs Moez Echargui Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 05 Nov at 02:59 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
L. Tien vs M. Echargui

USA
1
Win
Played
0
Win

TUN
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Tien 1 - 0 Echargui
They have played 2 sets in total, with Learner Tien winning 2 and Moez Echargui winning 0. The last match between Learner Tien and Moez Echargui was at the Moselle Open - Metz, 05-11-2025, Round: R2, Surface: I.hard, with Learner Tien getting the victory 7-6(3) 6-3.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Tien | 1 |
| Echargui | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R2) Moselle Open - Metz(11-05-25)
L. Tien vs M. Echargui H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $1,347,650 | Career Prize Money | $6,390 |
| 70.30% (142-60) | Career Total W/L | 59.40% (379-259) |
| 1 | Indoor | 0 |
| 10 | Titles | 17 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 56.60% (30-23) | YTD Win/Loss | 80.00% (4-1) |
L. Tien vs M. Echargui Match Preview:
- Learner Tien has a slight edge in second serve performance, winning 45.51% of points compared to Moez Echargui's 44.52%. Could this give Tien an advantage? Potentially, as second serve success often correlates with match outcomes.
- In terms of return games, Tien again holds a small advantage by winning 45.27% of points on opponents' second serves, against Echargui’s 43.85%. However, Echargui outperforms on first serve returns with 26.28% as opposed to Tien’s 24.03%. Is this variability enough to tip the scale? It could influence match dynamics, particularly during service games.
- When facing breakpoints, Moez Echargui exhibits marginally superior composure, saving 55.31% of breakpoints, compared to Tien's 54.64%. Could this slight edge in pressure situations become decisive?
- Reviewing their overall match performance over the past year, Moez Echargui stands out with a 75.26% win rate compared to Tien's 58.57%. Does this suggest Echargui is the more consistent competitor?
- Both players have similar success rates on hard courts, each winning 75% of their matches. However, Tien struggles more on clay while Echargui performs worse on indoor hard courts. How will their preferred surfaces impact potential strategies?
- Learner Tien has predominantly participated in Main tour events with a respectable 61.11% win rate, whereas Moez Echargui has excelled in lower-tier tournaments, winning 80%. Does the level of competition faced give Tien a tactical advantage?
- Opponent quality indicates Tien has faced significantly higher-ranked players, with an average opponent rank of 97.93, compared to Echargui’s 420.73. Could this higher-level experience work in Tien’s favor?
- In deciding sets, Tien holds a slight edge, securing 62% of these sets, while Echargui clinches them at a rate of 59%. Might this statistic be crucial if the encounter reaches a final set?
- While past performance is a valuable predictor, current event form should also be examined. For further insights, consider their performance so far at the current event if available.
Editorial Prediction (November 5, 2025, UTC):
As we analyze the upcoming tennis match, key statistics suggest a nuanced battle between Learner Tien and Moez Echargui. Tien has a slight edge in second serve and return performance, which could prove crucial during their service games.
Although Echargui's overall win percentage in the past year is impressive, it largely comes from lower-tier circuits, whereas Tien has been competing against more highly-ranked opponents. This experience at a higher level could tip the balance in Tien's favor.
In situations of pressure, both players display similar statistics, but Echargui narrowly saves more break opportunities. Nonetheless, Tien’s superior deciding set record could be the decisive factor if the match extends to its longest form.
Considering the comparative analysis of performance metrics and the level of competition they have faced, Learner Tien is the favored contender and is most likely to win this upcoming tennis match.
Learner Tien vs Moez Echargui Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
L. Tien vs M. Echargui H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 9 |
| 5 | Aces (Total) | 7 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 1:36:25 | Average Match Time | 1:36:25 |
| 54% (37/68) | 1st Serve % | 65% (50/77) |
| 86% (32/37) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (32/50) |
| 55% (17/31) | 2nd Serve Win % | 56% (15/27) |
| 18% (2/11) | Break Pts Won % | 25% (1/4) |
| 39% (30/77) | Return Points Win % | 28% (19/68) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
L. Tien Recent Matches Played
M. Echargui Recent Matches Played

L. Tien vs M. Echargui Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 70.30% (142/60) | YTD Win/Loss | 59.40% (379/259) |
| 63.21% (311/181) | Sets Win/Loss | 57.94% (865/628) |
| 54.46% (2545/2128) | Games Win/Loss | 53.16% (7388/6509) |
| 74.83% (107/36) | Hard Win/Loss | 66.94% (241/119) |
| 35.29% (6/11) | Clay Win/Loss | 51.78% (131/122) |
| 73.53% (25/9) | Indoor Hard W/L | 28.00% (7/18) |
| 50.00% (4/4) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.28 | Aces Per Game | 0.27 |
| 631 | Aces Total | 1854 |
| 0.28 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.24 |
| 638 | Total Double Faults | 1630 |
| 1:42:14 | Average Match Time | 1:42:40 |
| 292.14 | Average Opponent Rank | 501.57 |
| 62% (9152/14719) | 1st Serve % | 59% (23928/40475) |
| 68% (6202/9152) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (15967/23928) |
| 52% (2893/5567) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (8177/16547) |
| 46% (701/1528) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (2138/4825) |
| 41% (6005/14531) | Return Points Win % | 43% (17926/41644) |
| 50.00% (7/7) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 47.37% (9/10) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 54.55% (6/5) |
| 65.91% (29/15) | Main Tour W/L | 40.00% (2/3) |
| 75.00% (39/13) | Challenger W/L | 46.56% (88/101) |
| 79.45% (58/15) | Futures W/L | 65.51% (283/149) |
| 72% (130/181) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 60% (371/617) |
| 50% (9/18) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 63% (5/8) |
| 61% (49/80) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 54% (92/169) |
| 71% (45/63) | Deciding Set Win % | 53% (119/223) |
| 94% (120/113) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (368/315) |
| 6% (120/7) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (368/51) |
| 34% (82/28) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 25% (269/67) |