Leolia Jeanjean vs Maddison Inglis Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 29 Sep at 05:54 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
L. Jeanjean vs M. Inglis

FRA
1
Win
Played
0
Win

AUS
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Jeanjean 1 - 0 Inglis
They have played 2 sets in total, with Leolia Jeanjean winning 2 and Maddison Inglis winning 0. The last match between Leolia Jeanjean and Maddison Inglis was at the Suzhou WTA 125 - Suzhou, 29-09-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Leolia Jeanjean getting the victory 6-2 7-5.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Jeanjean | 1 |
| Inglis | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) Suzhou WTA 125 - Suzhou(09-29-25)
L. Jeanjean vs M. Inglis H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $903,999 | Career Prize Money | $628,555 |
| 62.65% (265-158) | Career Total W/L | 58.81% (307-215) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 4 | Titles | 9 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 31.25% (5-11) | YTD Win/Loss | 0.00% (0-6) |
L. Jeanjean vs M. Inglis Match Preview:
- Leolia Jeanjean’s recent performance shows she wins 40.15% on her second serve, compared to Maddison Inglis who wins 43.77%. Does this indicate an advantage for Inglis? Potentially in closely contested matches.
- In return games, Jeanjean outperforms Inglis by winning 51.27% of her opponent's second serves, compared to Inglis' 47.81%. This suggests Jeanjean's stronger return game might disrupt Inglis’ serve.
- Both players save breakpoints at nearly identical rates, with Jeanjean at 49.74% and Inglis at 49.75%. This similarity could mean limited advantage when they face pressure situations.
- Jeanjean boasts a slightly higher match win rate over the last year at 63.22%, nudging ahead of Inglis' 60.29%. Does this indicate a potential edge in consistency and form?
- Both players excel on hard courts, but Jeanjean has a slightly better career win percentage on this surface at 66% over Inglis’ 61%. Could court familiarity play a crucial role?
- Jeanjean has faced higher-ranked opponents compared to Inglis over the past year, suggesting exposure to tougher competition. How might this experience influence her play under pressure?
- If the match extends into a deciding set, Jeanjean has a minimal but potentially significant edge, having won 52% of such sets compared to Inglis' 50%.
Editorial Prediction (September 29, 2025, UTC):
Analyzing the recent stats highlights intriguing parallels and differences between Leolia Jeanjean and Maddison Inglis. Both players demonstrate comparable pressure-handling by saving a similar percentage of breakpoints.
However, Jeanjean’s slightly superior return game, especially against second serves, paired with her higher overall match win rate, suggests she may hold a marginal edge over Inglis.
Moreover, Jeanjean's encounter history with more competitive opponents may better prepare her for high-pressure scenarios. Finally, despite similarities in their first serve returns, Jeanjean's effectiveness against second serves could tip the balance in critical moments.
Considering these factors, Leolia Jeanjean is favored to emerge as the likely winner in this upcoming tennis match.
Leolia Jeanjean vs Maddison Inglis Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
L. Jeanjean vs M. Inglis H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 7 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 6 |
| 1:36:54 | Average Match Time | 1:36:54 |
| 50% (35/70) | 1st Serve % | 59% (32/54) |
| 66% (23/35) | 1st Serve Win % | 59% (19/32) |
| 63% (22/35) | 2nd Serve Win % | 32% (7/22) |
| 83% (5/6) | Break Pts Won % | 25% (2/8) |
| 52% (28/54) | Return Points Win % | 36% (25/70) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
L. Jeanjean Recent Matches Played
M. Inglis Recent Matches Played

L. Jeanjean vs M. Inglis Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 62.65% (265/158) | YTD Win/Loss | 58.81% (307/215) |
| 59.40% (572/391) | Sets Win/Loss | 57.56% (689/508) |
| 53.93% (4602/3932) | Games Win/Loss | 53.07% (5774/5105) |
| 65.32% (81/43) | Hard Win/Loss | 60.74% (246/159) |
| 63.43% (137/79) | Clay Win/Loss | 46.81% (22/25) |
| 58.57% (41/29) | Indoor Hard W/L | 36.36% (4/7) |
| 46.15% (6/7) | Grass Win/Loss | 59.32% (35/24) |
| 0.18 | Aces Per Game | 0.16 |
| 735 | Aces Total | 845 |
| 0.32 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.27 |
| 1350 | Total Double Faults | 1427 |
| 1:19:54 | Average Match Time | 1:28:19 |
| 396 | Average Opponent Rank | 464.59 |
| 59% (13298/22579) | 1st Serve % | 65% (19236/29602) |
| 64% (8495/13298) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (12112/19236) |
| 46% (4268/9281) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (4848/10366) |
| 48% (1396/2879) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 48% (1758/3698) |
| 46% (10370/22533) | Return Points Win % | 45% (13792/30772) |
| 58.33% (21/15) | Slam W/L | 43.90% (18/23) |
| 46.67% (7/8) | Masters W/L | 38.89% (7/11) |
| 52.63% (20/18) | Main Tour W/L | 42.86% (24/32) |
| 61.76% (168/104) | Challenger W/L | 63.07% (251/147) |
| 79.03% (49/13) | Futures W/L | 77.78% (7/2) |
| 63% (260/411) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 59% (302/509) |
| 50% (2/4) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 33% (1/3) |
| 61% (34/56) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 64% (65/101) |
| 63% (76/121) | Deciding Set Win % | 53% (84/160) |
| 90% (248/223) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (301/258) |
| 10% (248/25) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (301/43) |
| 23% (175/40) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 23% (221/50) |