Leonie Kung vs Cadence Brace Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 16 Oct at 02:50 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
L. Kung vs C. Brace

SUI
1
Win
Played
1
Win

CAN
1
Win
Played
1
Win
Head-to-head: Kung 1 - 1 Brace
They have played 4 sets in total, with Leonie Kung winning 2 and Cadence Brace winning 2. The last match between Cadence Brace and Leonie Kung was at the Abierto Tampico - Tampico, 15-10-2025, Round: R2, Surface: Hard, with Cadence Brace getting the victory 6-2 6-1.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Kung | 1 |
| Brace | 1 |
Last 2 H2H Matches:
(R2) Abierto Tampico - Tampico(10-15-25)
(R2) W35 Wesley Chapel(02-08-24)
L. Kung vs C. Brace H2H Profile
L. Kung vs C. Brace Match Preview:
- How do Cadence Brace and Leonie Kung compare in recent second serve performance? Cadence Brace has a slight edge, winning 39.22% of points compared to Kung’s 36.08%.
- Looking at return game stats, Brace also leads by winning 50.47% of her opponent's second serve points, while Kung wins 48.99%.
- In terms of first serve returns, Cadence Brace again shows a marginal advantage by winning 34.73% compared to Leonie Kung’s 33.03%.
- Who handles pressure better? Recent figures show Leonie Kung saves 48.25% of breakpoints, slightly better than Brace’s 44.36%.
- Considering overall performance over the last year, Cadence Brace has a higher win rate at 64.18%, while Leonie Kung sits at 46.03%.
- Both players have their best career win percentages on hard surfaces, each at 61%. However, Kung shows a greater drop on grass than Brace does on indoor hard surfaces.
- Focusing on event level, Brace excels more in ITF tournaments > $10K with a 66.13% win rate, surpassing Kung's 48.21% in the same category.
- What about their direct H2H history? Leonie Kung leads, having won their only match and both sets they've played against each other.
- In matches against higher-ranked opponents, Kung has faced slightly tougher competition with average ranks of her opponents being 355.87 compared to Brace's 377.48.
- If the upcoming match extends to a deciding set, Brace holds an advantage by winning 69% of these scenarios, whereas Kung wins just 38%.
Editorial Prediction (October 16, 2025, UTC):
In their upcoming match, Cadence Brace enters with a marginally superior recent form, supported by slightly better second serve and return performance. Her ability to win a high percentage of deciding sets suggests resilience in tight matches.
While Leonie Kung has shown she can play well under pressure by saving more breakpoints, and holds a previous victory over Brace, the data points toward Brace having a slight edge overall. This is especially true given her performance in similar-level tournaments over the past year.
Based on recent trends and statistical edges, Cadence Brace is the likely winner in this matchup.
Leonie Kung vs Cadence Brace Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
L. Kung vs C. Brace H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 1 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 17 | Games Won | 22 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 8 |
| 5 | Total Double Faults | 9 |
| 1:44:40 | Average Match Time | 1:44:40 |
| 59% (66/112) | 1st Serve % | 51% (67/131) |
| 59% (39/66) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (41/67) |
| 46% (21/46) | 2nd Serve Win % | 53% (34/64) |
| 44% (7/16) | Break Pts Won % | 56% (9/16) |
| 43% (56/131) | Return Points Win % | 46% (52/112) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
L. Kung Recent Matches Played
C. Brace Recent Matches Played

L. Kung vs C. Brace Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 54.99% (303/248) | YTD Win/Loss | 58.88% (126/88) |
| 54.38% (683/573) | Sets Win/Loss | 58.33% (280/200) |
| 51.85% (5899/5479) | Games Win/Loss | 54.50% (2339/1953) |
| 59.31% (137/94) | Hard Win/Loss | 61.24% (79/50) |
| 52.23% (129/118) | Clay Win/Loss | 56.67% (34/26) |
| 52.46% (32/29) | Indoor Hard W/L | 52.00% (13/12) |
| 41.67% (5/7) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.11 | Aces Per Game | 0.13 |
| 596 | Aces Total | 271 |
| 0.24 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.28 |
| 1329 | Total Double Faults | 588 |
| 1:31:41 | Average Match Time | 1:45:57 |
| 513.19 | Average Opponent Rank | 444.66 |
| 68% (22754/33582) | 1st Serve % | 61% (8253/13534) |
| 59% (13362/22754) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (5075/8253) |
| 47% (5040/10828) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (2488/5281) |
| 49% (2128/4317) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 52% (869/1660) |
| 46% (15702/33808) | Return Points Win % | 47% (6164/13068) |
| 18.18% (2/9) | Slam W/L | 50.00% (1/1) |
| 0.00% (0/3) | Masters W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 42.22% (19/26) | Main Tour W/L | 66.67% (4/2) |
| 52.92% (181/161) | Challenger W/L | 58.33% (112/80) |
| 67.33% (101/49) | Futures W/L | 69.23% (9/4) |
| 55% (300/548) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 59% (124/209) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 49% (50/102) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 45% (17/38) |
| 49% (77/157) | Deciding Set Win % | 47% (26/55) |
| 88% (297/260) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 90% (126/113) |
| 12% (297/37) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 10% (126/13) |
| 17% (254/43) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 15% (88/13) |