Leopold Zima vs Egor Novikov Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Zima vs Novikov analysis and find out who is favored!
Leopold Zima vs Egor Novikov Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Zima has won 41.41% of points on his second serve, while Novikov has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Zima, in recent form, has won 46.48% of his opponent's second serve points, while Novikov has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 29.06% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Zima has saved 55.75% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Novikov has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Zima has won 55.77% of matches played (W/L 29/ 23), with Novikov winning 50% (W/L 1/ 1) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Zima has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 53/ 33), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 51% (W/L 58/ 55). Novikov has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 53% (W/L 9/ 8), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 46% (W/L 12/ 14).
- Player level: In the last year, Zima has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 56.86% of matches (W/L 29/ 22), where as Novikov has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 1/ 1). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Zima winning 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Zima winning 1 and Novikov winning 2. The last match between Zima and Novikov was at the M15 Antalya, 19-04-2022, Q3, Clay with Egor Novikov getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:28:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Zima and Novikov have played a deciding set 1 times, with Zima winning 0 times and Novikov 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Zima winning 0, and Novikov 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Zima has played against opponents with an average rank of 134.31 while Novikov has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Zima has won 53% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Novikov has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Zima has converted 45.45% of breakpoint opportunities, and Novikov has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Zima 0 - 1 Novikov
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
895
Rank
774
High
23
Age
R
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard0
0
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
22
Age
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
56% (155-123)
Career Total W/L
50% (52-52)
65% (15-8)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Leopold Zima | Egor Novikov |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
Sets Won | 1 | 2 |
Games Won | 10 | 20 |
Aces (Total) | 0 | 1 |
DFs (Total) | 4 | 1 |
Avg Match Time | 1:28:0 | 1:28:0 |
1st Serve % | 70% (38/54) | 57% (36/63) |
1st Serve Win% | 55% (21/38) | 69% (25/36) |
2nd Serve Win% | 25% (4/16) | 48% (13/27) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 43% (3/7) | 56% (5/9) |
Return Points W% | 40% (25/63) | 54% (29/54) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-1 4-6 10-3 |
Egor Novikov
Player
Leopold Zima
57%
(
36 of
63)
1st Serve %
70%
(
38 of
54)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
40%
(
25 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
67
Total Points Won
50
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Leopold Zima | Egor Novikov |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 65% (15/8) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 60% (32/21) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 53% (281/248) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 71% (5/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 50% (3/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 70% (7/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.25 | 0 |
Aces Total | 64 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0.09 | 0 |
DFs Total | 23 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 133.35 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 69% (528/770) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 72% (378/528) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 43% (104/242) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 41% (24/58) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 35% (251/727) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 65% (15/8) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 65% (15/23) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (4/8) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 71% (5/7) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 93% (15/14) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 7% (15/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 13% (8/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Leopold Zima Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF | 6-3 1-6 10-5 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 7-6(12) 6-3 | H2H | |||
QF |
Yannik Kelm
Player
Leopold Zima
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve %
56%
(
31 of
55)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
85%
(
29 of
34)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
23 of
55)
61
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
Leopold Zima
Player
Emanuele Turconi
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve %
72%
(
33 of
46)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
57
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | |||
Q1 | 1-6 6-4 10-8 | H2H | |||
QF | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Keegan Smith
Player
Leopold Zima
78%
(
31 of
40)
1st Serve %
67%
(
30 of
45)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
56%
(
5 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
10 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
56
Total Points Won
29
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H |
view more
Egor Novikov Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF |
Siddhant Banthia
Player
Egor Novikov
55%
(
26 of
47)
1st Serve %
40%
(
17 of
43)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
7
73%
(
19 of
26)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
10 of
17)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
36%
(
17 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
54
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Egor Novikov
Player
Ramazan Chaushogly
38%
(
13 of
34)
1st Serve %
43%
(
13 of
30)
5
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
5
100%
(
13 of
13)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
3 of
17)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
6 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
73%
(
22 of
30)
50
Total Points Won
14
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 1-6 6-3 10-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-1 7-6(5) | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-1 2-6 11-9 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-2 4-6 10-4 | H2H | |||
Q2 |
Andrey Chepelev
Player
Egor Novikov
76%
(
62 of
82)
1st Serve %
56%
(
40 of
71)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
6
60%
(
37 of
62)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
41%
(
34 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
34 of
71)
82
Total Points Won
71
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
QF |
Liam Gavrielides
Player
Egor Novikov
70%
(
42 of
60)
1st Serve %
60%
(
40 of
67)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
55%
(
23 of
42)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
43%
(
26 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
36 of
67)
70
Total Points Won
57
|
6-1 3-6 10-5 | H2H |
view more