Leopold Zima vs Tom Gentzsch Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Zima vs Gentzsch analysis and find out who is favored!
Leopold Zima vs Tom Gentzsch Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Zima has won 41.41% of points on his second serve, while Gentzsch has won 48.75%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Zima, in recent form, has won 46.48% of his opponent's second serve points, while Gentzsch has won 50.26%. The same stats for first serve returns are 29.06% and 30.5% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Zima has saved 55.75% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Gentzsch has saved 59.2% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Zima has won 55.77% of matches played (W/L 29/ 23), with Gentzsch winning 57.83% (W/L 48/ 35) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Zima has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 53/ 33), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 51% (W/L 58/ 55). Gentzsch has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 55% (W/L 52/ 43), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 42% (W/L 10/ 14).
- Player level: In the last year, Zima has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 56.86% of matches (W/L 29/ 22), where as Gentzsch has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 59.46% of matches (W/L 44/ 30). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Zima winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Zima winning 2 and Gentzsch winning 0. The last match between Zima and Gentzsch was at the M15 Grenoble, 06-02-2022, Q1 round, I.hard with Leopold Zima getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:21:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Zima and Gentzsch have played a deciding set 0 times, with Zima winning 0 times and Gentzsch 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Zima winning 0, and Gentzsch 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Zima has played against opponents with an average rank of 134.31 while Gentzsch has played against players with an average rank of 153.98.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Zima has won 53% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Gentzsch has won 57% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Zima has converted 45.45% of breakpoint opportunities, and Gentzsch has converted 41.34% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Zima 1 - 0 Gentzsch
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
895
Rank
774
High
23
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
547
Rank
544
High
20
Age
Plays
1
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
1
Minor
Form
56% (155-123)
Career Total W/L
54% (101-86)
65% (15-8)
YTD W/L
58% (11-8)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Leopold Zima | Tom Gentzsch |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 12 | 5 |
Aces (Total) | 9 | 2 |
DFs (Total) | 3 | 3 |
Avg Match Time | 1:21:0 | 1:21:0 |
1st Serve % | 64% (43/67) | 72% (38/53) |
1st Serve Win% | 72% (31/43) | 58% (22/38) |
2nd Serve Win% | 46% (11/24) | 33% (5/15) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 44% (4/9) | 20% (1/5) |
Return Points W% | 49% (26/53) | 37% (25/67) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-1 6-4 |
Leopold Zima
Player
Tom Gentzsch
64%
(
43 of
67)
1st Serve %
72%
(
38 of
53)
9
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
37%
(
25 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
26 of
53)
68
Total Points Won
52
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Leopold Zima | Tom Gentzsch |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 65% (15/8) | 58% (11/8) |
Sets Win/Loss | 60% (32/21) | 55% (24/20) |
Games Win/Loss | 53% (281/248) | 51% (221/214) |
Hard Win/Loss | 71% (5/2) | 40% (2/3) |
Clay Win/Loss | 50% (3/3) | 0% (0/1) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 70% (7/3) | 69% (9/4) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.25 | 0.68 |
Aces Total | 64 | 145 |
DFs per game | 0.09 | 0.31 |
DFs Total | 23 | 66 |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:37:48 |
Avg Opp Rank | 133.35 | 127.32 |
1st Serve % | 69% (528/770) | 66% (888/1349) |
1st Serve W% | 72% (378/528) | 72% (641/888) |
2nd Serve W% | 43% (104/242) | 50% (230/461) |
BPs Won% Total | 41% (24/58) | 45% (47/104) |
Return Pts W% | 35% (251/727) | 38% (520/1381) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
Futures W/L | 65% (15/8) | 65% (11/6) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 65% (15/23) | 58% (11/19) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (4/8) | 56% (5/9) |
Deciding Set W% | 71% (5/7) | 67% (4/6) |
1st set W, W | 93% (15/14) | 83% (12/10) |
1st set W, L | 7% (15/1) | 17% (12/2) |
1st set L, W | 13% (8/1) | 14% (7/1) |
Leopold Zima Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF | 6-3 1-6 10-5 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 7-6(12) 6-3 | H2H | |||
QF |
Yannik Kelm
Player
Leopold Zima
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve %
56%
(
31 of
55)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
85%
(
29 of
34)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
23 of
55)
61
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
Leopold Zima
Player
Emanuele Turconi
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve %
72%
(
33 of
46)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
57
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | |||
Q1 | 1-6 6-4 10-8 | H2H | |||
QF | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Keegan Smith
Player
Leopold Zima
78%
(
31 of
40)
1st Serve %
67%
(
30 of
45)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
56%
(
5 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
10 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
56
Total Points Won
29
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H |
view more
Tom Gentzsch Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 |
Andrea Guerrieri
Player
Tom Gentzsch
65%
(
53 of
82)
1st Serve %
58%
(
46 of
80)
2
Aces
6
6
Double Faults
7
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
62%
(
18 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
38%
(
31 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
34 of
80)
85
Total Points Won
77
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Aleksandre Bakshi
Player
Tom Gentzsch
48%
(
37 of
77)
1st Serve %
69%
(
61 of
89)
1
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
7
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
46 of
61)
60%
(
24 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
35%
(
27 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
33 of
89)
83
Total Points Won
83
|
2-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Ben Weintraub
Player
Tom Gentzsch
63%
(
61 of
97)
1st Serve %
65%
(
56 of
86)
1
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
9
66%
(
40 of
61)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
36 of
56)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
41%
(
40 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
39 of
86)
96
Total Points Won
87
|
4-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Lilian Marmousez
Player
Tom Gentzsch
70%
(
65 of
93)
1st Serve %
63%
(
56 of
89)
3
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
2
68%
(
44 of
65)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
40 of
56)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
33 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
30 of
89)
90
Total Points Won
92
|
7-6(6) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
R2 |
Tom Gentzsch
Player
Jorge Martinez Martinez
73%
(
60 of
82)
1st Serve %
61%
(
46 of
76)
8
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
70%
(
42 of
60)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
32 of
46)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
35%
(
29 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
29 of
76)
82
Total Points Won
76
|
7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Tom Gentzsch
Player
Darwin Blanch
70%
(
61 of
87)
1st Serve %
65%
(
63 of
97)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
69%
(
42 of
61)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
43 of
63)
38%
(
10 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
40%
(
35 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
39 of
97)
91
Total Points Won
93
|
2-6 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
SF |
Max Hans Rehberg
Player
Tom Gentzsch
63%
(
53 of
84)
1st Serve %
76%
(
50 of
66)
6
Aces
11
2
Double Faults
0
70%
(
37 of
53)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
40%
(
34 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
27 of
66)
77
Total Points Won
73
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
QF |
Tom Gentzsch
Player
Yannik Steinegger
63%
(
32 of
51)
1st Serve %
66%
(
38 of
58)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
13 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
25 of
58)
63
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Tom Gentzsch
Player
Lasse Poertner
67%
(
45 of
67)
1st Serve %
71%
(
52 of
73)
7
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
1
82%
(
37 of
45)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
33 of
52)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
27%
(
18 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
28 of
73)
77
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Tom Gentzsch
Player
Justin Engel
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve %
55%
(
24 of
44)
8
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
6
90%
(
28 of
31)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
15 of
24)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
20%
(
9 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
22 of
44)
57
Total Points Won
31
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H |
view more